Posted on 04/11/2011 9:51:50 PM PDT by Gargantua
The surprise generated by the throwing of Donald Trump's hat into the ring of 2012 presidential hopefuls is in part based upon his relative wealth, and professional and social status. He certainly needs no political clout to better command any situation he chooses, so that can't be his motivation.
In part it is based upon his own unchallenged political history, having donated to both Republicans and Democrats over the years. While his donations number fairly evenly between the two, he has been more generous with Democrats, who also seem better to mirror his personal lifestyle.
The heads that are scratched the most vigorously are those owned by the cognescenti aware of his past, and recent, associations wirth George Soros... a man many believe to be a major string-puller behind much of the Obama puppet Administration.
All of these facets are worthy of discussion and even disagreement. There are plenty of openly available resources for arguing both sides of any of the rationale raised above here. With one glaring exception:
If there is even the slightest scintilla of a chance that Trump could prove to be aught but another bit player in the myriad machiavellian orchestrations perpetrated by George Soros over the years, with the sole goal of manipulating the surrender of a soveriegn United States to his dream of a coming "New World Order," is there any reason at all to even consider voting for him?
The liklihood of The Donald agreeing to playing pawn in a Soros end-game could well go up exponentially if the lucre and position offered by Soros in return were significant enough, as Donald has never made any bones about his avarice or greed. Further, there is little Soros would likely be unwilling to sacrifice to see the U.S., the final and most difficult stumbling-block in his path to a One World solution, swept off of the playing board in a single coup-de-gras.
Again, despite that the evidence is almost all circumstantial and anecdotal, the only way taking such a risk on such a unknown quantity with such obvious opportunity for ulterior motives would be if there were no other possible candidate out there who would do a better job. No other contender on the horizon with a proven history of accomplishing remarkable successes in short timeframes against significant odds.
The fact is America has another such opportunity, with far more dependable conservaTIVE credentials, who has never donated one penny to a Liberal cause, or spent one evening rubbing shoulders with "Spooky Dude" Soros.
Given all the above, supporting Trump would be a fools errand, even if it didn't result in checkmate. Which it clearly could.
*** ~ ***
Next, he says that "If Republicans get too far out ahead on cutting things like Medicare, they're gonna lose a big election in 2012."
He's cautioning against the GOP making budget suggestions that the Dems can use for political footballs!!!
Here's a clue, Hairdo: No matter what the GOP suggests, the Dems WILL TRY TO USE IT AS A POLITICAL FOOTBALL!!! If our GOP congressmen try to "lead" by only suggesting what the Dems will go along with, WE'RE DEAD!
Just as I was worried about, Trump is a Soros MOLE. On Hannity NOW.
;-\
Levin's exposé of The Donald pretty much synopsizes his end as a "conservative" candidate. Kudo's the the Freepers who dug up the Soros connection with Trump's campaign manager.
God bless Freepers.
8^D
Are you saying that there is no actual information linking Trump to Soros? You say “even if” there is the “slightest scintilla,” but where is it?
In fact, in at least three of these more recent exposés, it has been acknowledged that my article was instrumental in prompting the additional digging and scrutiny that ended up in what we now know to be virtual proof-positive of Trump's "conservative" illusion.
Rather than tell you what to think, I'll leave it to you to decide what conclusion, if any, you'd like to draw from Trump's previously as-stated venom toward conservatives and their causes, and his undeniable connection to Soros via the guy he named as manager of his political bid.
But back to your original question, no... back when I wrote the article, no such "actual information" had yet come to light. The sun now shines brightly on most of it... but only since I wrote that arguably psychic piece.
Thank you for noticing.
;-\
So far the only Soros-Trump connections that I can find are that a pending RICO complaint, without supporting facts, alleges cooperation between the two, based on “information and belief” in money-laundering in connection with the GM building and that they once attended the same party given by the investment guru Roubini. What are some of the specific “daily revelations” about a connection between the two of which you speak?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.