Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Masters: Tiger's charge proves he's back, once and for all
CBS Sports ^ | 04/10/2011 | Mike Freeman

Posted on 04/10/2011 6:01:55 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

AUGUSTA, Ga. -- There first needs to be a simple, declarative statement to settle something once and for all, an answer to a question that's been asked for days, if not months. The statement is this: Tiger Woods is back.

He is. It's official. He didn't win the Masters, but after a courageous, almost history-making performance, it's impossible not to declare the career of Woods reinvigorated from the waitress-chasing dead.

Everything was present. The charge was there. He made up seven shots in eight holes, including an eagle on eight that led to the loudest roar of the weekend. Check. Some early leaders began to fall apart once Woods closed in. Check. Rory McIlroy had a bit of premature coronation, Jean Van De Velde-ing into people's lawns. Check, check, check.

McIlroy's falter was Woods’ gain. Woods caused McIlroy to panic. No question about it.

The caddy for Woods' playing partner shook Woods' hand at the conclusion of Woods' stunning round of 67 and said to Woods: "You're back."

You're back. Yes, he is. He is.

With all due respect to winner Charl Schwartzel, it was Woods who was the biggest story of the Masters despite finishing tied for fourth and four shots back with a 278.

You had to see it in person to understand. On the course, the gallery was throaty and chaotic. People could barely contain themselves as Woods made his run. Woods was fist-pumping again. His attitude was nasty again. Some of the staff at Augusta -- those who cook the food and empty the trash -- were mesmerized, sneaking a peak at the large television screen in the press room to watch Woods.

It's possible there hasn't been such emotion for a player who didn't win in the history of the Masters.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbssports.com ...


TOPICS: Society; Sports
KEYWORDS: cheater; drugs; masters; steroids; tigerwoods; wheredawimminat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 last
To: SeekAndFind


121 posted on 04/11/2011 8:15:47 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius Valerius
Again, as I have noted before, where are these Europeans that you're talking about?

Let's look at it this way. From the PGA leaderboard for the Masters, taking my own count:

Total contenders:99...46 Americans, 53 foreigners.
Made the cut: 21 Americans, 28 foreigners
Missed the cut: 25 Americans, 25 foreigners

Foreigners had 28 of 53 players make the cut (53%). Americans 21 of 46 (46%). 54% of all who were eligible to contend for the cut were foreigners.

That's what I'm getting at.

122 posted on 04/11/2011 8:46:57 AM PDT by bcsco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Publius Valerius

“Are you kidding? He’s 35 years old. An apt comparison to Tiger, in my mind, is Tom Watson.”

No, I’m not kidding. Jack won 6 of his majors at 35+ (over a 24 year period) and Tiger is only 4 behind him now - after 11 years...and consider the conditioning available today. Not hard to imagine at all. And there are no serious competitors to Woods when he is back, this weekend notwithstanding. A couple of good rounds doesn’t make you Woods or Nicklaus, Arnold or Watson. That’s some pretty rarefied air.

Arnie only won 7 over an 8 year period. As for Watson, he won 7 total, also over an eight year period. How you could compare Watson and Woods is bewildering. Watson LIFETIME had about half the tourny wins Woods had after 11 years.

I think the reason people scoff at comparing Woods to Jack is that Jack Nicklaus is Golf personified, not his race, although some of the posts about Woods, even here, show that is somewhat a factor.

If you were comparing him to Walter Hagen, you might have an easier time, even though a lot of people really underestimate Hagen (maybe to long ago?) for some reason, he was a truly great golfer with some bad (some rumored even nasty) habits off field. Comparing him to Jack or Arnold is real tough to do, but they themselves have said it, that he is the most complete GOLFER they have ever seen. Jack believes Tiger will break his record. He is on record as saying he hopes he’s there to shake his hand when it happens.

Hard to top that for being a gentleman.


123 posted on 04/11/2011 10:15:54 AM PDT by jessduntno ("Money...can't exist unless there are goods produced and men able to produce them." - Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

While I was impressed with most aspects of his game (like the 230 yard shot to the green off the pinestraw underneath the Eisenhower pine — vintage Tiger), he didn’t seem to have his old ability to sink the pressure putts. That was the one weakness that I noticed.


124 posted on 04/11/2011 2:11:43 PM PDT by blau993
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Palio di Siena
Tiger is overhyped, (not overrated). The analysts all say that the tournament begins on the back nine on Sunday. Tiger’s back nine today was ordinary at best. Schwartzel’s string of birdies on the final four holes to win the Masters was absolutely incredible. The authors assertion that the young man from Northern Ireland folded because he was intimidated by Woods is absolute BS in my opinion.

Agreed. Tiger's back nine was PAR [Birdie cancelling out the Bogey]. And McElroy folded simply because he IS a 21-year old who finally realized the enormity of the entire situation on the last day ...

125 posted on 04/12/2011 11:02:07 AM PDT by Lmo56 (If ya wanna run with the big dawgs - ya gotta learn to piss in the tall grass ...</i><p>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson