Skip to comments.
No acceleration of global sea level over the past 100 years” (Sorry Algore-Sea levels not rising)
WUWT ^
| 3/28/2011
| Anthony Watts
Posted on 03/28/2011 10:41:30 AM PDT by Signalman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
1
posted on
03/28/2011 10:41:33 AM PDT
by
Signalman
To: steelyourfaith
2
posted on
03/28/2011 10:46:05 AM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: Signalman
“It is essential that investigations continue to address why this worldwide-temperature increase has not produced acceleration of global sea level over the past 100 years, and indeed why global sea level has possibly decelerated for at least the last 80 years.”
Warmer air can hold more moisture ‘in suspension’.
3
posted on
03/28/2011 10:48:55 AM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post.)
To: Signalman
Sort of on topic question.......
What percentage of world water is present in vapor form within the atmosphere in ratio to the amount condensed or precipitated out and is in bodies of water or in the ground sysyem?
Al Gore will argue that it's just a matter of time until the skies open up, which Australia has been the first to experience as we've witnessed. It's right there in front of your eyes. The sea levels are rising, but much higher than the sea.
I'm not of that theory, but that will be their answer.
4
posted on
03/28/2011 10:50:04 AM PDT
by
blackdog
(The mystery of government is not how Washington works but how to make it stop)
To: UCANSEE2
You beat me by two minutes. If I hadn't been so wordy and used spellcheck I'd have beat you.
Like minds........
5
posted on
03/28/2011 10:51:46 AM PDT
by
blackdog
(The mystery of government is not how Washington works but how to make it stop)
To: blackdog
But Obama announced that we were going to stop the rising of the seas, and allow the planet to heal. What ever happened with that????
To: Signalman
Gore already knew this.
That’s why he bought his multimillion dollar condo by the sea last year.
7
posted on
03/28/2011 10:59:24 AM PDT
by
I still care
(I miss my friends, bagels, and the NYC skyline - but not the taxes. I love the South.)
To: Dilbert San Diego
The GAO is currently processing the bids for Band-Aids large enough for the wounds to heal.
8
posted on
03/28/2011 10:59:48 AM PDT
by
blackdog
(The mystery of government is not how Washington works but how to make it stop)
To: UCANSEE2
Or perhaps the stated premise is untrue or at least exagerated. Perhaps the “worldwide temperature increase . . . over the last 100 years” is not as significant as we have been led to believe.
9
posted on
03/28/2011 11:04:29 AM PDT
by
p. henry
To: Signalman
10
posted on
03/28/2011 11:04:56 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sheldon Cooper
(If Mohammed were alive today, he wouldnÂ’t be allowed to live within 1000 yards of a school.)
To: Signalman
Acceleration in sea level: Global Warming
No acceleration in sea level: Global Warming
Deceleration in sea level: Global Warming
11
posted on
03/28/2011 11:05:02 AM PDT
by
sima_yi
( Reporting live from the People's Republic of Boulder)
To: Signalman
but .. but ..

I saw it in a dream.. a vision.. Tsunami!
12
posted on
03/28/2011 11:06:56 AM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. Obama: Epic Fail or Bust!!!)
To: blackdog
Think of all the new wetlands and tidal marshes to manage by the feds!? Water in a physical large body of mass evaporates very slowly in contrast to marshes, wetlands, and tidal pools. The increase in sea levels will recover all those lost ecosystems that overdevelopment took out of the cycle. Desertification will reverse due to the increased atmospheric water supply, giving new life to water starved regions of the globe.
Of course I have no scientificly valid proof of this claim, but it's just as or more valid than anything the AGW crowd passes off as fact.
13
posted on
03/28/2011 11:07:37 AM PDT
by
blackdog
(The mystery of government is not how Washington works but how to make it stop)
To: sima_yi
Same people who tell me that.............
Flat enrollment means we need a tax increase for the schools
Increased enrollment means we need a tax increase to fund the schools.
Declining enrollment means we face a tax increase to fund the schools due to decreased state and federal funds based on number of students.
14
posted on
03/28/2011 11:10:46 AM PDT
by
blackdog
(The mystery of government is not how Washington works but how to make it stop)
To: Signalman
15
posted on
03/28/2011 11:14:22 AM PDT
by
Wuli
To: blackdog
Exactly right.
Declining student achievement: Need more money!
Level student achievement: Need more money!
Increased student achievement: See, it's working! Need more money!
16
posted on
03/28/2011 11:18:34 AM PDT
by
sima_yi
( Reporting live from the People's Republic of Boulder)
To: blackdog
What percentage of world water is present in vapor form within the atmosphere in ratio to the amount condensed or precipitated out and is in bodies of water or in the ground sysyem?Wikipedia (yes, I know the warnings) lists water as averaging 0.4% of the air and the total mass of the atmosphere as 5.1480×10^18 kg. Spread evenly over the entire surface of the earth that would be about 1.5 inches of water.
Copy this into google to see my calculation: 5.1480×10^18 kg * 0.4% * 1 (liter/kg) / (4 * pi * (4000 miles)^2) in inches
Another wiki page lists the mass of the oceans as 1.4×10^21 kg, so the atmospheric water is 0.0015% of the oceans' mass. That's somewhat in error because I didn't take into account ocean water's salt content.
(After doing that calculation I realized that wiki listed the atmospheric content by volume rather than by mass. Since water has a molecular weight of 18 compared to 28 and 32 for nitrogen and oxygen, I overstated the weight and final depth by about one third).
17
posted on
03/28/2011 12:04:18 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Washington is finally rid of the Kennedies. Free at last, thank God almighty we are free at last.)
To: Army Air Corps; FreedomPoster; Para-Ord.45; Entrepreneur; tubebender; mmanager; Fiddlstix; ...
18
posted on
03/28/2011 12:16:58 PM PDT
by
steelyourfaith
("Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty." -- Wendell Phillips)
To: Signalman
19
posted on
03/28/2011 12:19:23 PM PDT
by
popdonnelly
(Democrats are silly people - but silly people can be dangerous)
To: p. henry
Agreed. If I recall correctly, over 1/2 of the supposed increase is due to "adjustments" in the data (i.e. making the older data look cooler, and more recent data look warmer). Then there are the problems of bad station siting (near asphalt, next to A/C units, etc.) and urban heat islands, which are pretty much ignored.
My take is that the data has been manipulated, and we have been lied to. The whole AGW scare is one giant fraud whereby insiders make money, and everyone else in the world suffers.
20
posted on
03/28/2011 3:17:23 PM PDT
by
vrwc1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson