I wonder many times as I read the news from 1941, what did the average reader understand - let me elaborate a bit. If I pickup a NYT and read it today, I know I am getting bias information and I filter it with that bias in mind. This filtering goes for the Washington Post, St. Pete Times, Politico, Free Republic, etc. Did the FOLKS do the same? What did they understand?
I know that so many people today who do read the NY Times see no bias in it at all. I find it very hard to believe so many either refuse to admit the bias or are just so lacking intelligence to understand.
Sorry for the rant, just thinking out loud.
Nice to know there’s still “nothing of importance” to report from Libya for the Brits.
Glenn T. Seaborg who has been working with the tranmuted element of Neptunium which he recently determined was element 94 (to be named Plutonium next year) discovers that the new element undergoes fission with slow neutrons. This is important since it makes it more readily fissionable just like the difficult to obtain Uranium 235. Seaborg recorded the following:
This morning Kennedy, Segrè and I made our first test for the fissionability of 94239 using Sample AKennedy has constructed during the past few weeks a portable ionization chamber and linear amplifier suitable for detecting fission pulses Sample A (estimated to contain 0.25 micrograms of 94239) was placed near the screened window of the ionization chamber embedded in paraffin near the beryllium target of the 37-inch cyclotron. The neutrons produced by the irradiation of the beryllium target with 8 MeV deuterons give a fission rate of 1 count per minute per microampere. When the ionization chamber is surrounded by a cadmium shield, the fission rate drops to essentially zero
This give strong indication that 94239 undergoes fission with slow neutrons.