CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE VIDEO OF HER EXCHANGE WITH BILL O' REILY
To: SeekAndFind
Ed Schultz of MSNBC targeted Ann Coulter and her recent comments on radiation’s positive health benefits in his “Take Down” segment on Friday night. Last week, Ann Coulter wrote a blog post about the positive health benefits of radiation and made national headlines when Bill O’Reilly scolded her on his show for the shoddy research and inappropriate timing of her incendiary claims. Schultz agreed and took the scolding to the next level saying:
A lot of people say Ann Coulter is toxic. But we had no idea that she would take that literally. You would laugh at her if she wasn’t making light of a terrible tragedy.
Watch Schultz’s segment in full. Note Ann Coulter’s glowing green head.
CLICK THIS LINK FOR THE VIDEO :
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/03/21/ed_schultz_ann_coulter_radiation
To: SeekAndFind
She and O Reilly make fun of birthers. They are stooges for Obama and Prince Al Waleed. Ef both of them.
3 posted on
03/23/2011 10:16:09 AM PDT by
Frantzie
(HD TV - Total Brain-washing now in High Def. 3-D Coming soon)
To: SeekAndFind
Coulter was at FUJPAC saying how there needed to be more homo conservatives.
Most likely, again, we’ve been fooled again.
5 posted on
03/23/2011 10:17:45 AM PDT by
Christian Engineer Mass
(25ish Cambridge MA grad student. Many younger conservative Christians out there? __ Click my name)
To: SeekAndFind
I always thought she was an idiot. This only proves what I thought all along.
6 posted on
03/23/2011 10:17:47 AM PDT by
Red in Blue PA
(For the first time in my adult life, I'm scared of my government.)
To: SeekAndFind
7 posted on
03/23/2011 10:18:41 AM PDT by
Responsibility2nd
(Yes, as a matter of fact, what you do in your bedroom IS my business.)
To: SeekAndFind
Unless it comes from a TSA scanner, then, according to Ann Coulter a la a couple weeks ago, small amounts of radiation are a major health hazard!
16 posted on
03/23/2011 10:26:40 AM PDT by
allmendream
(Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
To: SeekAndFind
Coulter made a rather broad statement that if examined in the detail is correct. But being right is of no consequence to the emotional and petty.
21 posted on
03/23/2011 10:31:46 AM PDT by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: SeekAndFind
I hope the little bit of radiation we're getting from Japan is OK. Heck, when I was a kid, they set off nukes out in the desert in Nevada.
So far the only side effect I've seen is that it must've fried a few brain cells, otherwise how do you explain harry reid?
39 posted on
03/23/2011 11:29:48 AM PDT by
The Sons of Liberty
(Psalm 109:8 Let his days be few and let another take his office. - Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
To: SeekAndFind
The Fukishima plume is going to be about as radioactive as an banana after traveling 5000 miles.
Also: Anne is plausibly correct about radioactive hormesis. There’s a J-shaped response to many poisons: it’s plausible that a small amount of radioactivity has a net positive effect. She certainly shouldn’t be shouted down without examining the facts.
40 posted on
03/23/2011 11:41:47 AM PDT by
agere_contra
(Whenever a Liberal admits to something: he is covering up something far worse)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson