Here is the problem with this.
It is noise. And non-useful noise.
The legal birth father of Obama is...Obama senior. That is the absolute legal and relevant FACT.
This LEGAL fact was established and is anchored by the Stanley Ann / Obama Sr. divorce. Though the marriage is murky, the divorce is not. It is on file and even has a redacted or removed page from the documents.
To undo Obama Senior as father, you would have to undo that divorce - legally. With the parties of that divorce deceased that is not going to happen.
So this is interesting tabloid stuff. But from legal, Constitutional aspect - it matters not.
This detracts from the issue - natural citizenship. That is the issue - regardless of birth location. So it is playing into the hands of those that obscure that fact to open conjecture about other biological fathers. Because then people can say - “well maybe he is NOT the son of a foreigner and so if that is the case AND he was born in Hawaii then he would qualify a natural born Citizen.” So it gives hope of avoiding the usurpation issue. But there is not possibility of another father legally. Its BHO Sr. And that can not be changed for all practical purposes.
Remember:
“Son of Brit (and even still a Brit) ain’t legit.”
Nope. Unless and until an actual birth certificate demonstrating that parentage surfaces, legally it's just hearsay...
And you know that "absolute and relevant FACT," how?
You assume (as many of us do) that the missing page from the divorce file is Barry0’s birth certificate.
But it might not be. If not, the divorce decree is not proof of legal parentage.
A reading of your various posts suggests you have an objective view of most of the known facts and issues. Let me ask about the logic in your statement above.
Under what theory is it possible for a non-U.S. birth to detract from NBC?
I submit location of birth is a fundamental element of NBC, and the answer could lead to fast tracked impeachment and removal (and election fraud). Non-U.S. birth represents game over. On the other hand, foreign citizen parentage depends entirely on a USSC opinion that it may or may not apply retroactively to O.
Of the two issues, which issue is it that O has never avoided and which does he continue to avoid?
Whose agenda is it that calls for ignoring the birth issue?
If foreign citizen parentage is the only way to disprove eligibility, by what means can it be established sooner than establishing non-U.S. birth?