You assume (as many of us do) that the missing page from the divorce file is Barry0’s birth certificate.
But it might not be. If not, the divorce decree is not proof of legal parentage.
You assume (as many of us do) that the missing page from the divorce file is Barry0’s birth certificate.
But it might not be. If not, the divorce decree is not proof of legal parentage.
________________________________________________________________________
No assumption. In fact I had to do a refresh on the document. See #45 for link.
Actually, I was wrong and apologize for saying the documents did not specifically name Obama II. The divorce decree DOES EXPLICITLY name Barack Obama II as the child the two parents. See section IV of the divorce decree. Full name and date.
So he is fully named in the document.
Again, these documents show the LEGAL fact. And as I have indicated real facts (actual biological parentage) and legal facts (those documented by government entities) do not always match.
So please do not take my comments as ‘proving’ what actually happened - who knows. But the divorce proceeding established Obama II as Obama Seniors child and established the birth date of August 4, 1961 in the legal world.
I would bet that the missing page is the original BC or record of birth from August of 1961. But it would be fully legally redacted if there were an adoption.
And remember:
“Born a Brit (and he still is) ain’t legit.”
IIRC the attorney in the divorce case also was counsel to the HI DNC and they would NOT put Soetoro on the HI ballots, apparently they knew the real truth of the B.C.!!!