Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where are the Nuclear Agencies on this? We need official Press Conferences on this situation - NOW.

Posted on 03/12/2011 5:24:20 AM PST by Scythian

The collective Nuclear Industry is massively failing the people they have so long sought to protect. There is no real, reliable, trustworthy news being reported on the situation in Japan except for vague and conflicting reports.

Where is the World Nuclear Association?

Where is the International Atomic Energy Group?

Where is the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission?

There should be press conferences on the situation in Japan, the people of the world should know all of the facts on the ground in "real time" because of the nature of the danger we are dealing with.

I am in favor of Nuclear Energy but if this is the way nuclear disasters are going to playout, that is, the general populace in the dark about the real danger then I am dead set against Nuclear Energy. These Nuclear Agencies should be out front on this (at least one of them). There are people in Japan that know exactly what is happening and the Nuclear Agencies should be out front with the information right now, in a press conference.

This is an epic failure on their part, in the future I suggest they be prepared and out front.


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Music/Entertainment; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: japan; nuclear; panic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

1 posted on 03/12/2011 5:24:25 AM PST by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scythian

Its a Saturday come on they are off


2 posted on 03/12/2011 5:25:35 AM PST by al baby (Hi Mom!!! <sarc>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

Dude...mellow out.


3 posted on 03/12/2011 5:25:44 AM PST by Drango (NO-vember is payback for April 15th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

Give it a rest.

The IAEA is busy giving nuclear weapon info to Iran
while fomenting unrest in Egypt or whereever with ElBaradei.


4 posted on 03/12/2011 5:27:22 AM PST by Diogenesis (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

From an industry PR standpoint I think you are right. This plays in to the fearmongers’ hands.

On the other hand, this is similar to when firefighters are fighting an 8 alarm fire and some talking head on a live broadcast wants to interview the fire chief on the scene ... and then gets all huffy when the people are a little too busy saving lives and property to talk to the pretty Miss.


5 posted on 03/12/2011 5:27:50 AM PST by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
Dude...mellow out.

Exactly, that's the way I want my nuclear melt down coverage and information. Unless they get out in front this a lot of folks who are pro Nuclear are going to re-think it, like me.
6 posted on 03/12/2011 5:27:53 AM PST by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

I’m with you. Was always pro nuke but rethinking this where there are fault lines. We’ve got the “ boobs” down in San onofre in CA - scary.


7 posted on 03/12/2011 5:29:56 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Scythian; moder_ator

is this a VANITY?


8 posted on 03/12/2011 5:30:15 AM PST by campaignPete R-CT (Palin '12 begins in '11. In western New Hampshire pour moi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scythian
The collective Nuclear Industry is massively failing
The nuke plants survived intact, they just can't get coolant flowing.
So, isn't it the failure of the backup "generators" that is causing the problem?
9 posted on 03/12/2011 5:30:24 AM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

The point is they have to make time to relay the information, it’s part of managing a crisis.


10 posted on 03/12/2011 5:30:44 AM PST by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Scythian
Here is the latest info I have been able to find. I posted it at another thread a few minutes ago.

The nuclear reactor at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Okuma, Japan, damaged by the earthquake, is apparently experiencing a meltdown. According to STRATFOR, the earthquake
appears to have damaged the containment facility, and the explosion almost certainly did. There have been reports of “white smoke,” perhaps burning concrete, coming from the scene of the explosion, indicating a containment breach and the almost certain escape of significant amounts of radiation.
At this point, events in Japan bear many similarities to the 1986 Chernobyl disaster. Reports indicate that up to 1.5 meters (4.9 feet) of the reactor fuel was exposed. The reactor fuel appears to have at least partially melted, and the subsequent explosion has shattered the walls and roof of the containment vessel — and likely the remaining useful parts of the control and coolant systems.
[It] appears to have damaged the containment facility, and the explosion almost certainly did. There have been reports of “white smoke,” perhaps burning concrete, coming from the scene of the explosion, indicating a containment breach and the almost certain escape of significant amounts of radiation.
At this point, events in Japan bear many similarities to the 1986 Chernobyl disaster. Reports indicate that up to 1.5 meters (4.9 feet) of the reactor fuel was exposed. The reactor fuel appears to have at least partially melted, and the subsequent explosion has shattered the walls and roof of the containment vessel — and likely the remaining useful parts of the control and coolant systems.
And so now the question is simple: Did the floor of the containment vessel crack? If not, the situation can still be salvaged by somehow re-containing the nuclear core. But if the floor has cracked, it is highly likely that the melting fuel will burn through the floor of the containment system and enter the ground. This has never happened before but has always been the nightmare scenario for a nuclear power event — in this scenario, containment goes from being merely dangerous, time consuming and expensive to nearly impossible.

11 posted on 03/12/2011 5:31:03 AM PST by DanMiller (Dan Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven
The nuke plants survived intact, they just can't get coolant flowing. So, isn't it the failure of the backup "generators" that is causing the problem?

Really, and you know this for sure? How? And we are to trust our family's health to a guy on the internet with the the handle 'oh8eleven' why?

You see my point, I'm not attacking you, you are proving my point exactly.
12 posted on 03/12/2011 5:33:06 AM PST by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DanMiller

Thanks for the information, funny, ‘oh8eleven’ just said above there is no problem. Again, they should be out front in this in press conferences on TV. But thank you, the situation, if your info is true, is pretty bad indeed.


13 posted on 03/12/2011 5:35:06 AM PST by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

Yeah, the only problem I see is in building nuclear plants in places known to have massive earthquakes.

The upper midwest is a great place for them.


14 posted on 03/12/2011 5:36:37 AM PST by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Scythian
Get over yourself. They probably don't know the extent themselves at this point. And you are, what, half the globe away?

You sound like some dang greenie.

15 posted on 03/12/2011 5:40:03 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scythian
I asked the question - did not state as fact.
Take your smarmy reply and stick it where the coolant doesn't flow.
16 posted on 03/12/2011 5:41:19 AM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DanMiller
Oh man!!!

And if that happens - Godzilla?

17 posted on 03/12/2011 5:42:09 AM PST by ninonitti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT
is this a VANITY?

Vanities are the best. I like them. Freepers make more sense than any other source.

18 posted on 03/12/2011 5:43:06 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

Back when I was an engineering student they took us out to the next door INL LOFT (Loss Of Fluid Test) project. They had a reactor running and they would remove coolant in various stages to see what the reactor would do.

There were viewports in the top of the reactor (the floor) that you could look through at the core. Weird electric (neon) blue glow.

Talk about fun.

19 posted on 03/12/2011 5:43:51 AM PST by bigheadfred (THE ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE HAS BEGUN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

Up to now, radiation levels are low and will be easily dispersed. If the situation does not worsen, there is no point for foreign nuclear authorities to step into the issue right now.


20 posted on 03/12/2011 5:46:46 AM PST by J Aguilar (Fiat Justitia et ruat coelum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson