Judge won't block implementation of healthcare law

Los Angeles Times ^ | 03/03/2011 | Editor

[Logical me]

There is no stopping this communists Administration and the corrupt judicial system. America will be destroyed by 2012 and there is no way to stop our communists black Muslim King Obama.

[Prospero]

The article is criminally stupid (i.e., "deliberately ignorant") journalism... or "reporting," or "news reading," or whatever. I often wonder, as the legacy media continues it's slow march to extinction, whether we do it more a service than a disservice to add to its audience.

As far as the regular readers of FreeRepublic are concerned, the news here is not the news itself, which is just plain wrong in this case, or the publishing of a ridiculously shameless piece of plain prima facie bull.

[Freedom56v2]

Do reporters read rulings anymore before writing articles?

---

Sock puppet reporter probs just read and regurgitated talking points from bamster.

[goodnesswins]

Here’s another one who doesn’t know how to read....

Tom Diemer....PoliticsDaily.....

http://www.politicsdaily.com/2011/03/03/judge-says-states-must-enforce-health-reform-law-he-threw-out/

[Eric in the Ozarks]

Nonsense.
This story is a complete fabrication.

[sport]

I would not hold my breath.

[sport]

How else would you put it?

The Court ruled it UnConstitutional, don’t continue to implement it.

The obama administration said to the Court, Go screw yourself, we are going to continue to implement it.

Who is going to stop them?

[IrishCatholic]

He does know the decision is online, doesn’t he? Who is he trying to kid?

[longtermmemmory]

do we have a count down clock?

[Jacquerie]

I like your attitude. But when the three branches agree on constitutionality, including compliance with the 10th, what can the states and people do short of revolt?

[sport]

I wish.

[Defend Liberty]

I like your attitude. But when the three branches agree on constitutionality, including compliance with the 10th, what can the states and people do short of revolt?

The three branches agreeing something is Constitutional does not in and of itself make it Constitutional. Only the people have that power. If nullification does not work then the people can turn to the Declaration of Independence for the answer:

"When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

[sport]

No. Nor do they check facts. They just write what the Minister of Propganda instructs. And from what I have seen and heard, that includes “Christian” broadcasting stations and Fox.

[sport]

How is that working out so far?

[Mr.Unique]

In further news, Rita Cosby just announced that Al Gore has won his case at the Supreme Court and is now POTUS.

[Defend Liberty]

How is that working out so far?

Is your alternative not to defend the Constitution and simply let the socialists/communists destroy our Constitutional freedoms?