Posted on 03/04/2011 8:59:30 PM PST by Swordmaker
Even the chair on the stage was the same.
Yesterdays iPad 2 introduction felt like a repeat of last years event for the original iPad. Same place. Same pace and structure for the presentation: a brief prelude of statistics showing how well Apple is doing company-wide; a positioning statement for where the iPad fits, why it exists; the reveal of the product; the specs; a tour of the system software; and, then, some demos of a few impressive iPad applications from Apple that are available for just $4.99 in the App Store.
Delightfully, the host was the same as last year, too.
(Have you ever noticed that Steve Jobs is not introduced at Apples events? Music plays while the audience fills the room. (Well-chosen popular rock, some new, some old, often Dylan. Now, its all Beatles, all the time. Its as though Apple now treats the Beatles catalog as the companys official soundtrack.) Eventually, a few minutes before the start of the show, theres an announcement asking everyone to silence their phones. Then, one or two more songs, and then there simply is no next song. A few seconds later, Jobs strides out, unheralded.)
One difference between this year and last is that Jobss presence was not expected. The ovation that greeted him yesterday was loud, almost raucous. We were, simply, happy to see him.
The biggest difference, though, was this: last year Apple didnt yet understand the iPad. They knew it was good. They knew it had potential. But they didnt know what it was. They had a sense that in the conceptual space between an iPhone and a MacBook there was uncharted, fertile territory. And they set for themselves a wise metric: the iPad would only succeed if it could do some of the same things a Mac can do, but do them better. If it wasnt better in several important ways for several common tasks, it would not succeed.
What they didnt know last year was how people would use it, for real. They know now.
Last years flagship app demos were the iWork suite: Pages, Numbers, and Keynote. The message was: the iPad is like a PC, just different word processors and spreadsheets have been the standard answer to Why would you buy this computer? going all the way back to VisiCalc in the early 80s.
This year, Jobs stated explicitly and repeatedly that the iPad is not a PC. Jobss repeated categorization for the iPad: post-PC device. And the demos this year were of a slightly different tone. iWork is, well, work. Making movies and music, though? Thats play.
iMovie for iPad seems like the realization of Randy Ubilloss vision for movie editing software. Seldom does an app as popular and useful as iMovie get a genuine lets just start over from scratch redesign like iMovie did on the Mac several years ago. And the current Mac version is, without question, a major improvement over the initial redesigned version. This iPad version, though, feels like the real deal, and makes the Mac version seem like the imitator. The concept, visual layout, and intended workflow are naturally suited to touch. This is what the new iMovie is supposed to be.
And GarageBand for iPad impressive doesnt even begin to describe it. There are a bunch of musical instrument apps for the iPhone and iPad, and theyve been used to great effect by many musicians. (Insert your own smirking mockery of those who insist the iPad is only for consumption and not creation here.) GarageBand for iPad is of a different scope. This is Apple taking the idea of the iPad as a musical instrument and tackling that idea with the full strength of its collective creativity. It is the most iPad-ish iPad app Ive ever seen. Good iPad apps can make the iPad feel not like a device running an app, but like an object that is the app. GarageBand isnt a musical app running on an iPad. It turns an iPad into a musical instrument. The interfaces for each GarageBand instrument are exquisitely skeuomorphic. Every control every button, every switch, every slider is custom designed. The keyboards use of the accelerometer to detect how hard you hit the keys seems impossibly accurate for a device that doesnt have a pressure-sensitive display. If anything, in practice, it worked better than the on-stage demo implied. GarageBand isnt the iPad doing something better than the Mac. This is the iPad doing something new, things that couldnt be done on the Mac.
Jobs seemed particularly ebullient throughout, but never more so than when discussing the iPads competition. Theres a palpable sense among everyone from Apple I spoke to yesterday that this is the biggest and most important thing in the history of the industry. The this isnt just the iPad. Its the whole iOS ecosystem iPhone, iPod Touch, iPad, the App Store, the 200 million iTunes Store account holders, the Apple retail store empire where customers get to touch these things that must be touched to be understood. But the iPad best exemplifies the advantages Apple draws from these things.
Last year, Apples take on the iPad seemed to be that they believed they had something good. This year, they seem to know they have something enormous. Presumably, theres an A5-based dual core iPhone 5 coming in June and a corresponding new iPod Touch and who knows what else coming in September, but Apple is already, a mere two months into it, calling 2011 The Year of the iPad 2. Apple sells every new product hard, but theyre not prone to that sort of hyperbole.
In his conclusion, Jobs said, Its in Apples DNA that technology is not enough. Thats what separates Apple from everyone else, and the iPad epitomizes it. Its better designed, has more developer support, and its cheaper. There are aspects of this that Apples competitors seemingly cant copy lower prices from economies of scale, amazing battery life, UI responsiveness, build quality.
But there are other things any competitor could copy, easily, but they seemingly dont even understand that they should, because such things arent technical. Take that chair. The on-stage demos of the iPad arent conducted at a table or a lectern. Theyre conducted sitting in an armchair. That conveys something about the feel of the iPad before its screen is even turned on. Comfortable, emotional, simple, elegant. How it feels is the entirety of the iPads appeal.
Its a shame, almost, that we squandered the term personal computer 30 years ago.
Fart sniffing rating 9.7
stop drinking and go to bed...
Is this an Apple site with you?
If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.
I dont drink do you?
Now that was mighty damn funny!
Stealing free BSD is good. Paying people to create your own is bad.
The new iPad 2.0 for the narcissistic in all of us. The iOS? Cripes they really went overboard with just putting an i in front of every word and all of a sudden it becomes relevant and something people NEED!
Once I heard jobs mention an iPet I had to have one. It's the pleasure of owning a pet without spending money on food or vet bills. NO GREENHOUSDEM GASSES!!!! Boy, that Steve Jobs with his eco-minded ways are the wave of the future. Next up from Jobs is the iIdea, an app that stimulates and simulates brain storming.
This is a forum where MANY topics are allowed and discussed. There are dozens of special topics that Jim Robinson allows. And dozens of ping lists. There are approximately 520 of your fellow Freepers who are members of the Mac/Apple Ping List who have asked me to keep them appraised of events and articles of interest to them. Its one of the larger lists. In addition to the members of the list, many other Freepers participate in the Apple threads and find them informative. Jim Robinson has personally OKed these Apple/Mac/iPad/iPhone threads.
Hilarious! Loved the iShotgun.
was giving you an out for your juvenile comment...
That was well done and great fun!
And a lot of work on their part to put it together.
Marketing 2.0....Create a Need and Fill It.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.