Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Free trade" is not the solution to our problems. "Free trade" is the problem...
(vanity)

Posted on 02/13/2011 4:06:39 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network

It is time to face up to the elephant in the living room, which for some reason conservative Americans are desperately determined to ignore.

"Free trade" is destroying America.

A generation ago, America was the world's preeminent power. We led the world in manufacturing. Technology. Space. Innovation. In every way, America was the best.

In a single generation, we have squandered that heritage, and now are deeply in debt to a communist nation which just one generation ago - rode only bicycles.

WTF will it take, to wake Americans (particularly conservative Americans, who should know better) up to the very real danger of stripping America of everything which made her great?


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: americafirst; china; freetrade; globalism; trustthegovernment; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-280 last
To: Lancey Howard; All

I want the labor unions destroyed..


261 posted on 02/14/2011 5:49:44 AM PST by KevinDavis (If you buy a car from GM, you are supporting Obama..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Take the money raised via tariffs and use them to provide tax incentives to set up manufacturing on US soil....

When you spread the wealth around it's good for everybody?

262 posted on 02/14/2011 5:50:13 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

you know, it’s headlines like this that make me wish this site had a “thumbs up” or “like” button !


263 posted on 02/14/2011 6:02:01 AM PST by stompk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

“As I said, it isn’t my opinion — it is a FACT. You either know economics or you do not.”

Which economic theory are you claiming as FACT?
Keynesian, Austrian, etc?


264 posted on 02/14/2011 6:13:11 AM PST by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Last Dakotan
So in your reading of newspapers, you have determined that China is going to declare war on the U.S. (of whose debt BTW they are the biggest holder).

Perhaps you could provide me a link to your source of information?

265 posted on 02/14/2011 6:35:00 AM PST by SonOfDarkSkies ('And what rough beast, its hour come round at last, slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?' Yeats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

Declaring war is an old and outdated way of fighting. Look for something more original.


266 posted on 02/14/2011 6:57:18 AM PST by Last Dakotan (Hunting - the ultimate in organic grocery shopping.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: Last Dakotan
Ohhh? Now you're bragging about being original, too.

And don't tell me your original thinking leads you to believe that trade and business are war. Everyone has known that since prehistory.

Still waiting on a link to your "original thinking" source.

267 posted on 02/14/2011 7:06:53 AM PST by SonOfDarkSkies ('And what rough beast, its hour come round at last, slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?' Yeats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies
Ok, why are the Chinese actively fielding "carrier killer" missile systems?

I don't share your Pollyannish views.

268 posted on 02/14/2011 7:12:35 AM PST by Last Dakotan (Hunting - the ultimate in organic grocery shopping.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: Last Dakotan
Flip-flop? Now you're abandoning "original thought" for a return to conventional warfare?

Cheese and crackers man...just make your point and quit beating around the bush.

269 posted on 02/14/2011 7:20:55 AM PST by SonOfDarkSkies ('And what rough beast, its hour come round at last, slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?' Yeats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies
just make your point and quit beating around the bush.

I'd assume at the point they are ready to retake Taiwan, they'd just declare the western Pacific off limits. No declaration of war necessary.

270 posted on 02/14/2011 7:29:13 AM PST by Last Dakotan (Hunting - the ultimate in organic grocery shopping.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: Last Dakotan
Thx for that.

I certainly agree that Taiwan is on their agenda, but the entire Western Pac would certainly mean war (of course, if Obama is in office, who the h$ll knows what our response would be).

I don't actually believe China has martial intentions toward the U.S. (banks don't attack their borrowers without damaging their own interests).

If China is preparing for war, I think it will be with India.

271 posted on 02/14/2011 7:41:06 AM PST by SonOfDarkSkies ('And what rough beast, its hour come round at last, slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?' Yeats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Religion of Free Trade / Free Trade Taliban bump for later.......


272 posted on 02/14/2011 8:37:01 AM PST by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va; ClearCase_guy
I'll try ignoring your ad hominem argument and curses to see if a reasonable discussion is in here somewhere...

This convoluted article makes sweeping and erroneous statements about how free trade is destroying America, mixing up socialist-style U.S. government polices with the free market. History and economic fact says otherwise about free markets and free trade. The rule is, the country imposing the tariff is the one that gets burned, because, among other things, tariffs limit the country's citizens to the most competitive quality and price available.

Overall, history and economic fact demonstrate that free-market capitalism makes the country utilizing it more wealthy and powerful than it would be otherwise. In particular, intelligence and clear economic sense should drive our dealings with a perceived enemy. We must weigh the pluses and minuses of dealing with such countries. Usually tyranny thrives on poverty. Usually the free market brings with it more choices, exchanges of ideas, and economic benefits which can lead to eventual dissipation or overthrow of a restrictive regime. It's not a cut and dried case if what you want is the greatest benefit to our country. The bad guy may benefit but we may find that we benefit more. If we find the opposite is true, then maybe an embargo is needed. But making the exception the rule is like shooting yourself in the foot.

273 posted on 02/14/2011 8:37:50 AM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

“That’s the system they have in China and it will fail.
Probably so, but what if we fail first.”

It may take China a hundred years to fail. If we don’t get rid of this “Too Big To Fail” business model and “Corporate Welfare” government system, we well fail sooner than China. You can’t stop the Free Market. You can suppress it, but it can’t be killed. The more governments want to control it, the deeper and wider it will spread underground. Example: New York’s cigarette tax and black market cigarettes.


274 posted on 02/14/2011 12:53:25 PM PST by steveab (When was the last time someone tried to sell you a CO2 induced climate control system for your home?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Trade Secrets = protectionism? What???


275 posted on 02/14/2011 1:15:32 PM PST by The Watcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

YOu said: “I honestly cannot think of a single measure by which China is not doing better than we are.”

Massive unemployment
Massive poverty
Massive financial problems

Economy based on exporting, meaning it is completely at the mercy of importing nations.

Educational system that’s utterly broken.

No domestic industrial base. Everything China makes, is an exploitation of cheap labor. They don’t invent anything, don’t design anything, tey merely copy and exploit for cheap labor and management.

China’s banking problems are FAR worse than ours.

I think the problem, is that you don’t know a damn thing about China, and instead, believe what you read from liberal propagandists.


276 posted on 02/14/2011 1:18:48 PM PST by The Watcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Do you always make up things?

Ah, The last gasp of a dead argument. My post clearly explains what it is you are advocating for. It's good that this realization makes you uncomfortable. It's kind of weird seeing someone argue so vehemently for bigger government, more taxes, and higher prices for all Americans, on a conservative forum.

277 posted on 02/14/2011 5:26:42 PM PST by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: Mase

“My post clearly explains what it is you are advocating for”

No, your post is pure nonsense, fiction, a product of someone who has lost. Just as your last post is nonsense as well.


278 posted on 02/14/2011 5:33:02 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

You idiot, if we STILL had factories in place that actually MADE those items, WHO CARES if they are 30% higher?

Or is THAT what needs to be said to get your attention?

LETS Raise prices 30%

THEN, it MIGHT be profitable to make it here again, because THAT’S why it ISNT made here any more!


279 posted on 02/14/2011 8:19:44 PM PST by RaceBannon (RON PAUL: THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS, TRAITORS AND UFO CHASERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Who’s this ‘we’? I don’t have a factory. I never had one. Don’t want one. Don’t ever want to work in one. Couldn’t care less if I ever see one.

If you have one, good. Best of luck. Be happy in your work.

Who’s this ‘Let us, of Let us raise prices’. Not me. If you, go ahead. ( Oh, that’s right, you mean, but won’t say, “I want politicians to decide prices of goods, like Lenin did during his rush to industrialization phase’. )

/idiot off


280 posted on 02/15/2011 3:35:16 AM PST by Leisler (Our debts are someone's profit. Follow the money, the vig.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-280 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson