To: lawnguy; pandoraou812; Daffynition; barker; ferri; gjeiii; genefromjersey; texas booster; ...
2 posted on
02/08/2011 9:10:00 PM PST by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, A Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
You are missing the viking hat and lightning.
5 posted on
02/08/2011 9:22:29 PM PST by
Eyes Unclouded
("The word bipartisan means some larger-than-usual deception is being carried out." -George Carlin)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Before I get started, Pawn shops can be the worst place in the world to buy stuff unless you really know you stuff.
I have found a few bargains tho. I was in a shop in Savannah, GA and noticed a Leica binocular on the very top shelf. It was an 8X30 model in excellent conditon. I could barely see the price tag and it looked like $1200. It sort of made me mad because that probably was the selling price new but a used one should be quite a bit less.
I looked more closely and saw a dot between the 2 and 0. It was only $12.00. I began to get excited and sort of matter of factly looked it over and indicated I would take it.
The salesman sort of chuckled and I thought to myself, “he knows”, but he went ahead and wrote it up. As I was walking out the door he said, “you know that is really worth $75 don’t you?” I answered that I didn’t know that. They were really worth around $500.
I also once bought a nice Nikkormat EL with a mint 50mm f/1.4 lens. It was marked $15. I checked it out and again tried to remain calm as I paid the money. I suspect the owner thought it was a cheap knockoff trying to fool you into thinking it was a Nikon. Actually it was a Nikon.
7 posted on
02/08/2011 9:23:38 PM PST by
yarddog
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Thanks for the excellent photo, she is so beautiful. Please don’t stop posting kitteh pix.
[ I’m still waiting for a kitteh to find me.]
10 posted on
02/08/2011 9:29:05 PM PST by
LucyT
To: SWAMPSNIPER
12 posted on
02/08/2011 9:31:28 PM PST by
ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
(Standing by the walls of Minas Tirith as Sauron's forces pound the gates...)
To: SWAMPSNIPER; Eye of Unk
Eye of Unk - did you see this cat photo?
Really, really nice!!
16 posted on
02/08/2011 9:42:36 PM PST by
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
I’m not proficient in photography speak, but the focus/depth of focus (as I understand it) looks terrific! Just right on the face and then gradual softening going back. an enigmatic expression you caught there. : )
19 posted on
02/08/2011 10:08:46 PM PST by
skr
(May God confound the enemy)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Does the Kat belong to a union yet?
21 posted on
02/08/2011 10:12:19 PM PST by
tubebender
(The coldest winter I ever spent was a summer in Eureka...)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Piker. My 1938 Rolleiflex Automat will be good for another 73 years.

;-)
22 posted on
02/08/2011 10:25:37 PM PST by
Uncle Miltie
(0bamanomics: Punish Success, Reward Failure. Destroying America is the point.)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Love the depth of field. Very well done.
28 posted on
02/09/2011 12:12:50 AM PST by
Islander7
(There is no septic system so vile, so filthy, the left won't drink from to further their agenda)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Awwwwe. looks almost like my Norwegian Forest cat, at least in regards as to the exact same look.
30 posted on
02/09/2011 12:20:32 AM PST by
Eye of Unk
("These people are either at your neck or at your knees" A quote by Winston Churchill)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Swampsniper,
Outstanding photo as usual.
32 posted on
02/09/2011 1:09:10 AM PST by
VOA
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Swampy...the 1.4s that came out during the 70s and early-mid 80s were excellent lenses. Many offered almost macro capabilities during on camera focusing as well as truly excellent resolution during enlargement while printing. With the appropriate enlarger lenses, of course.
Competition was stiff and measuring methods were well developed at that time. The photo magazines as well as the technical papers all were quick to post what lenses were good and which ones were known to offer color aberrations, barrel effects and drop-off at the fringes as well as bad lens-body lock-up and aberrations at reduced apertures.
It was truly a time when all the makers(marques) put out their best efforts and the photo-public was well served with the results.
33 posted on
02/09/2011 2:38:42 AM PST by
Tainan
(Cogito Ergo Conservitus.)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Another good one SS.
That old 50mm makes a nice 75mm portrait lens on your Sony.
But since your using off camera 'Studio Lighting', try one at f/5.6 and focus on Pandora's nose. It may come out a tad 'better' (Histogram reading) than this one at f/2.8 (very flat).
If you have time that is. And your Model cooperates ;-)
36 posted on
02/09/2011 5:14:38 AM PST by
Condor51
(Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a Congressman. But I repeat myself. [Mark Twain])
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Oh WOW!!
What a great photo, and a beautiful subject!
Thanks!
37 posted on
02/09/2011 6:23:18 AM PST by
siamesecats
(God closes one door, and opens another, to protect us.)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
It looks like kitty finally gave up and decided to be a cooperative model......beautiful, swamp.....
40 posted on
02/09/2011 7:20:15 AM PST by
Kimmers
(Tell a lie often enough it becomes political........)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
WoW! Beautiful photograph!
41 posted on
02/09/2011 4:16:10 PM PST by
mojitojoe
(In itÂ’s 1400 years of existence, Islam has 2 main accomplishments, psychotic violence and goat curr)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Another 26 years? That’s a long-lived cat!
42 posted on
02/09/2011 4:18:16 PM PST by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson