Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paul Gauguin's tribute to Vincent Van Gogh expected to fetch £10m
The Telegraph ^ | Jan 2011

Posted on 01/30/2011 4:36:10 PM PST by SeekAndFind

A still life of sunflowers by Paul Gauguin, painted in tribute to his friend Vincent Van Gogh, is expected to fetch up to £10 million at auction.

Gauguin painted the work, Nature morte à L'Espérance, in 1901 while he was living in Tahiti. It is the highlight of an Impressionist and Modern Art sale at Christie's in London on February 9.

The depiction of sunflowers was a fitting tribute to Van Gogh and a reference to the months in 1888 when the two artists shared a home, a period that ended in tragedy. The pair lived together in Arles, France, spending their days at work in what was known as the Yellow House. At the time, both were poor and unknown, although Gauguin was slowly developing a name for himself.

It was there that Van Gogh produced his own sunflower paintings and he decorated Gauguin's bedroom walls with them. However, his drinking and mental instability led their friendship to unravel. "Between two such beings as he and I, the one a perfect volcano, the other boiling inwardly, some sort of struggle was preparing," Gauguin wrote.

In the grip of manic depression, Van Gogh sliced off part of his left ear on December 23. Gauguin left Arles on Christmas Day and the two never saw each other again. Van Gogh died in 1890.

When Gauguin moved to Tahiti, he wrote to a friend back in France asking him to send sunflower seeds so that he could recreate a little corner of France in the South Seas. The painting was done "doubtless in part as a tribute to his friend and fellow artistic pioneer Vincent Van Gogh, who had died just over a decade earlier", a Christie's spokesman said.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Arts/Photography; History
KEYWORDS: painting; paulgauguin; vangogh; vincentvangogh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Painted by Paul Gauguin in 1901 in Tahiti, the painting is expected to fetch between £7 million to £10 million
1 posted on 01/30/2011 4:36:18 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Well, I’ve studied art history, have a BFA and have critiqued numerous artists and their work before, so it’s surprising to me that this apparently highly noteworthy Gauguin leaves me cold. The color palette is murky and uninspired, composition is not particularly compelling and the subject matter is not just trite but somehow oddly depressing.

To think that this brown smudge of dead sunflowers and childish doodles of human figures is to fetch ten million pounds is just amazing to me, I really don’t see it. They have to be buying the provenance and the name(s), and not the beauty of the work. That, or the JPEG absolutely does not do it justice at all.

Or maybe I’m just feeling curmudgeonly, presuming to tackle a Gauguin and panning it.

/artsnob off, lol


2 posted on 01/30/2011 4:58:18 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

I agree with you 100%.


3 posted on 01/30/2011 5:01:46 PM PST by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kabumpo

Nice to have company, I figured I’d get flamed, lol.


4 posted on 01/30/2011 5:13:51 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

I don’t have any art degrees but I have painted for 20 years and taken classes and workshops and I completely agree with you on this Gauguin. It has got to be one of the ugliest paintings I have seen in a while. I am not crazy about Gauguin’s work generally, I think he was celebrated for his life style more than anything.


5 posted on 01/30/2011 5:15:43 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind


6 posted on 01/30/2011 5:16:32 PM PST by LibFreeOrDie (Obama promised a gold mine, but will give us the shaft.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
What makes this painting worth $77 Million ? Is it the artist or the quality of the painting itself?


7 posted on 01/30/2011 5:19:17 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

I have a BA in Art History and concur with your assessment. This is by far one of the weakest and least dynamic work of Gauguin’s that I’ve ever seen. Granted, I have little interest in much 19th century stuff after the Pre-Raphaelites to begin with, but at least a lot of late-impressionist to post-impressionist stuff is visually interesting (especially Seurat :-). This looks like the canvas was dropped in a mud puddle.


8 posted on 01/30/2011 5:20:15 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I'll Try again...This painting sold for $77 M in 1987 :


9 posted on 01/30/2011 5:21:39 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
To think that this brown smudge of dead sunflowers and childish doodles of human figures is to fetch ten million pounds is just amazing to me, I really don’t see it. They have to be buying the provenance and the name(s), and not the beauty of the work. That, or the JPEG absolutely does not do it justice at all.

My thinking on this is twofold.

On the one hand, I think that a lot of the value is because the painting is Gauguin's tribute to van Gogh.

On the other hand, while I agree that this isn't anywhere near as praiseworthy as much of Gauguin's other works, it's also been my amateur opinion that pictures of Impressionist art never even come close to capturing the beauty of the original.

10 posted on 01/30/2011 5:22:32 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Chance one has to take. As person in the arts, it’s sometimes frustrating and a challenge to communicate about art related themes in a Conservative forum. Sometimes I think it might be easier to convert leftists to our side than to have the average Conservative develop an aesthetic sensibility.


11 posted on 01/30/2011 5:26:00 PM PST by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Funny but Lust for Live (movie) is on right now as we speak. Vincent: Kirk Douglas and Paul Gauguin: Anthony Quinn. Great acting and many wonderful paintings of their works.


12 posted on 01/30/2011 5:27:37 PM PST by fish hawk (reporter to old Indian: you lived here on the reservation all your life? Old Indian, "not yet".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

You have a point re photos of paintings.


13 posted on 01/30/2011 5:28:33 PM PST by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk

change to : Lust For Life


14 posted on 01/30/2011 5:28:52 PM PST by fish hawk (reporter to old Indian: you lived here on the reservation all your life? Old Indian, "not yet".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kabumpo
I never appreciated any of the Impressionists until I saw some of the paintings in person.
15 posted on 01/30/2011 5:32:15 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
You must REALLY hate it when a couple of scribbled lines and a woman with the face of a monkey or her eye is under her nose goes for millions. (Picasso) I'm not an art snob at all but I believe it's all about who painted it, not if you think it's his greatest works.(or if you even like it at all ) I hate Salvador Dali but wouldn't mind having a six pack of his paintings.
16 posted on 01/30/2011 5:35:42 PM PST by fish hawk (reporter to old Indian: you lived here on the reservation all your life? Old Indian, "not yet".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Great collection at the Art Institute in Chicago.


17 posted on 01/30/2011 5:41:04 PM PST by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
That, or the JPEG absolutely does not do it justice at all.

I wondered how you could make any determination sight unseen. I would suspect the innate limitations of the Internet above all else. El Greco doesn't have a great impact on a webpage either.

18 posted on 01/30/2011 5:43:29 PM PST by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kabumpo
I've been there once, but only for about an hour and didn't really have enough time.
19 posted on 01/30/2011 5:45:57 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I'll Try again...This painting sold for $77 M in 1987 :

Have you ever seen it?

20 posted on 01/30/2011 5:46:51 PM PST by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson