Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

I found this extremely interesting, particularly in the light of the study published a few days ago, linking baby formula type to obesity. READ IT HERE
1 posted on 01/01/2011 2:19:45 PM PST by Former Fetus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Former Fetus

And therefore, we must have constant government monitoring of every child, from birth, so that his trajectory can be guided for the greater good of the collective.


2 posted on 01/01/2011 2:22:02 PM PST by Tax-chick (The gifts we have, we are given to share.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Fetus

But isn’t America starving and in poverty?


4 posted on 01/01/2011 2:29:31 PM PST by Dallas59 (President Robert Gibbs 2009-2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Fetus
Oh please....Says cereal in their bottle makes them fat, too.

This looks like a "nursing is the ONLY way to go" study....

11 posted on 01/01/2011 2:42:29 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Fetus

I’m guessing that giving babies fruit juice doesn’t help, either. The sugar promotes insulin spikes, which promote fat storage.


12 posted on 01/01/2011 2:43:58 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Fetus

Obviously these toddlers are swilling out on breast milk and baby formula. Damn gluttons, they should move around more and get off their butts, etc. etc.

Or we can perhaps start to re-evaluate the utterly failed paradigm(s) that have controlled our thinking about health, weight regulation and food for the last 40 years or so.

Some good starting points if you want to start the new year with losing weight:

“The inanity of overeating”
http://www.garytaubes.com/2010/12/inanity-of-overeating/

Excerpt:

“Now, if you gain 40 pounds of fat over 20 years, that’s an average of two pounds of excess fat accumulation every year. Since a pound of fat is roughly equal to 3500 calories, this means you accumulate roughly 7000 calories worth of fat every year. Divide that 7000 by 365 and you get the number of calories of fat you stored each day and never burned – roughly 19 calories. Let’s round up to 20 calories, so we have a nice round number. (In the new book I discuss this issue in a chapter called “The Significance of Twenty Calories a Day.”)

So now the question: if all you have to do to become obese is store 20 extra calories each day on average in your fat tissue — 20 calories that you don’t mobilize and burn — what does overeating have to do with it? And why aren’t we all fat? Twenty calories, after all, is a bite or two of food, a swallow or two of soda or fruit juice or milk or beer. It is an absolutely trivial amount of overeating that the body then chooses, for reasons we’ll have to discuss at some point, not to expend, but to store as fat instead.”

“Scientists now saying carbs, not fat, are to blame for America’s obesity epidemic”

http://articles.latimes.com/2010/dec/20/health/la-he-carbs-20101220

Professor Lustig´s hit Youtube lecture:

http://www.uctv.tv/search-details.aspx?showID=16717


14 posted on 01/01/2011 2:48:20 PM PST by globelamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Fetus

Have they done any longitudinal studies beyond 2 year olds? At 9 months I was a porker, as was my daughter. As we each matured, we slimmed out. I was never heavy again until my pregnancies.

I’m personally getting more than a little tired of these university researchers who come to some headline grabbing conclusion, then as it’s published, the conclusion becoming accepted without question.


24 posted on 01/01/2011 3:20:08 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Fetus

Imho, babies SHOULD be a bit chubby. It’s healthy, and is no indication of future weight issues at all. I was a chubby baby, and was extremely thin as I grew older. In my experience ( somewhat limited & anecdotal) thin babies are often chubby as they reach the age of around 3 or more, and can have lifelong weight problems.


26 posted on 01/01/2011 3:24:26 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Fetus

This BS is getting pretty thick!
.


29 posted on 01/01/2011 3:36:01 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Fetus

Some babies have those adorable little fat rolls that you just want to pinch! Gosh, I love them. All babies can be rolly polly at 9 months. Once they start walking, they start running. Running here, running there, running everywhere and burn off the weight. Who in the world wants to look at some skinny baby and announce that is normal. Well fed is a sign of health in infants. Want to see an unhealthy baby, look at the third world countries. I guess that is going to become our new Gerber babies.


33 posted on 01/01/2011 4:04:56 PM PST by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Fetus

I didn’t nurse my 3 kids, not one ever had a food allergy, ear tubes, asthma, never even a flu shot, etc. All 3 were chunks, loved it. All three are athletes and are still healthy as can be. Their combined ped. medical records is less than 2 inches thick. They have proved opposite EVERY so called formula/breast milk study.


36 posted on 01/01/2011 4:29:55 PM PST by panthermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Fetus

Babies are normally fat. That is what they do the first year of their life. It is a survival adaptation.

Thought I can say I have seen some that are (abnormally fat) which is just bad parenting.


38 posted on 01/01/2011 5:09:52 PM PST by jongaltsr (It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Fetus

Oh for pete’s sake, nine month old babies put on fat just before they walk. The walking and activity will slim them out to elegant three year olds/


42 posted on 01/01/2011 6:03:55 PM PST by Chickensoup (Protecting US interests ONLY if US interests move back into the States and give US citizens jobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Fetus

Oh for pete’s sake, nine month old babies put on fat just before they walk. The walking and activity will slim them out to elegant three year olds/


43 posted on 01/01/2011 6:03:55 PM PST by Chickensoup (Protecting US interests ONLY if US interests move back into the States and give US citizens jobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Fetus
Some extra weight at that age provides a reserve against illness or injury--something for the body to work with. "Low birth weight" used to be bad, as was the absence of baby fat.

Why measure against two year olds, why not four? (Because 2-4 is where kids really get active, sometimes distressingly so, and are likely to burn that fat off).

44 posted on 01/01/2011 6:19:57 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Former Fetus

Man made formulas are to blame along with ignorant moms that stick bottles into squawking mouths every 2 hrs. Try a little water in between feedings. Dump the formulas for 1% cows milk at 6 months.


47 posted on 01/02/2011 11:41:04 AM PST by GailA (DEMOCRATS and RINOS are BAD for the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson