[jamese777]

The U.S. District Court in D.C. has dismissed at least two quo warranto suits challenging Obama’s eligibility.

---

And here’s what Chief US District Court Judge for the District of Columbia Royce C. Lamberth had to say in his Memorandum Opinion for “Taitz v Obama” on quo warranto: “This is one of several such suits brought by Ms. Taitz in her quixotic attempt to prove that President Obama is not a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution. (See US CONST. Art. II, Section 1). This Court is not willing to go tilting at windmills with her.”
—Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth, April 14, 2010.

[butterdezillion]

The old “tilting at windmills” reason for denying a lawsuit. Not standing. Not that there is no damage. Not cited precedent. Not that the case itself is not authorized by law.

No legal reason at all. Just “tilting at windmills”.

Another red flag. How this bullsh!t passes as a legal ruling is beyond me.

[butterdezillion]

And, I might add, Lamberth totally blew off Judge Carter’s statements that Taitz’ case would properly be heard as a Quo Warranto in the DC Circuit. Sounds like he gave no legal justification for contradicting Carter. Sounds like he just blew a great big raspberry in all our faces and expects us to treat it as if it’s settled law then.

The arrogance of these SOB’s is incredible. Either that, or Royce C Lamberth was told what the end result had to be and he didn’t want to even bother trying to come up with some mindless blather to cover up that he was just farting in the general direction of the Constitution, as ordered to do.

Take your pick.