[butterdezillion]

The old “tilting at windmills” reason for denying a lawsuit. Not standing. Not that there is no damage. Not cited precedent. Not that the case itself is not authorized by law.

No legal reason at all. Just “tilting at windmills”.

Another red flag. How this bullsh!t passes as a legal ruling is beyond me.

[jamese777]

The old “tilting at windmills” reason for denying a lawsuit. Not standing. Not that there is no damage. Not cited precedent. Not that the case itself is not authorized by law.

No legal reason at all. Just “tilting at windmills”.

Another red flag. How this bullsh!t passes as a legal ruling is beyond me.

---

Judge Lamberth (a Reagan appointee) went into great detail in explaining exactly why he was dismissing the lawsuit. If anyone wants to read his entire Memorandum Opinion for themselves they can click on this link:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30040084/TAITZ-v-OBAMA-QW-23-MEMORANDUM-OPINION-dcd-04502943496-23-0