Skip to comments.
NYT: HISTORIC SHIFT - all congressional districts voted more Republican than in 2008 (MAP)
New York Times ^
| 11/03/10
| New York Times.com, frontpage
Posted on 11/03/2010 6:54:36 AM PDT by drzz
HISTORIC SHIFT
All congressional districts voted more Republican than in 2008 (+ 40 points)
see MAP
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: conservatives; elections; gop; history; liberals; midterm; obama; party; republican; tea; usa
1
posted on
11/03/2010 6:54:39 AM PDT
by
drzz
To: drzz
All 10 of those historic shift graphs are amazing.
39 house seat pick up by Tea Party!!!
NYT graphs are very detailed - a must visit site for everyone.
2
posted on
11/03/2010 7:00:57 AM PDT
by
libertarian27
(Ingsoc: Department of Life, Department of Liberty, Department of Happiness)
To: libertarian27
Give a click to NYT? I need to work up to it.
3
posted on
11/03/2010 7:04:05 AM PDT
by
Genoa
(Put the kettle on!)
To: drzz
4
posted on
11/03/2010 7:04:50 AM PDT
by
PMAS
To: libertarian27
Agreed .. must visit ... lots of data/information synopsized.
5
posted on
11/03/2010 7:06:09 AM PDT
by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
To: Genoa
You can do it - lol
It’s a sea of red....
They even break down to detailed state county pockets for the races.
6
posted on
11/03/2010 7:07:03 AM PDT
by
libertarian27
(Ingsoc: Department of Life, Department of Liberty, Department of Happiness)
To: libertarian27
39 house seat pick up by Tea Party!!!All the graphs are great... that one was a stunner.
7
posted on
11/03/2010 7:23:58 AM PDT
by
AnnaZ
(I keep 2 magnums in my desk.One's a gun and I keep it loaded.Other's a bottle and it keeps me loaded)
To: drzz
Thanks for posting.
I was surprised to see the black vote move to around 10% Republican. That is big.
8
posted on
11/03/2010 7:32:47 AM PDT
by
Gvl_M3
To: drzz
From the NYT subheading: “Many Centrists Are Defeated”
The commies who crashed and burned last night (Grayson, Haire, etc., etc.) could only be thought of as “centrists” by someone so far to the left that they’re on a different continent.
Which describes exactly the the reporter critters at the Times.
9
posted on
11/03/2010 7:35:17 AM PDT
by
SharpRightTurn
(White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
To: libertarian27
Leave it the nyt to provide a voter “mood” interactive! It’s pretty interesting though.
10
posted on
11/03/2010 8:42:12 AM PDT
by
parisa
To: AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; Delacon; ...
Thanks drzz. Ordinarily I'd be more worried, with an incumbent Obama in 2012 who can without a doubt count on 90+ percent of black voters casting their votes for him, added to their fellow racists among non-black voters -- added to the fact that economic hard times in the US generally show some light of day within a couple of years.
I don't think the latter will be the case. Obama and his fellow thugs have gutted the ability of what's left of the private economy to recover and hire people. We'll see more job flight over the border; we'll see MUCH more in the way of illegals taking jobs from Americans while Holder's Fake-Justice Dep't runs interference for them; we'll see oil price chaos engineered in part by the Iranians; and of course, we'll likely see a major but probably very short conventional war begin with an attack of Israel by the Islamofascists.
We'll also see the Demwits in the Senate becoming the Party of No because the Republican House of Representatives will have its bills shot down one after the other, never even making it to the WH for Zero's veto.
Obama will *not* be challenged for the nomination, despite his obvious antipathy toward the United States of America which is often interpreted as his gross incompetence. He knows exactly what he's doing, and gets exactly what he intends to get -- other than respect. By respect I mean that phony ghetto version which has nothing to do with actual respect.
All congressional districts voted more Republican than in 2008 (+ 40 points)
11
posted on
11/03/2010 4:08:06 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: drzz
Sorry pal, but your link lead to nothing.
This is from Wikipedia:
Bright red = Republican pick-ups
Brown = Republican holds
Blue = Democrats = blue = sad, sad... ;-)
12
posted on
11/03/2010 5:52:01 PM PDT
by
BroJoeK
(a little historical perspective....)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson