Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Capital Embellishment: Why do Tea Partiers uppercase so many of their nouns?
Slate ^ | 1 Nov 2010 | John Lackman

Posted on 11/01/2010 9:53:43 PM PDT by smokingfrog

If he becomes governor of Colorado, Tea Partier Dan Maes will remind citizens that "freedom originates in a Supreme Ruler of the Universe," according to his Web site. In her campaign materials, New Jersey congressional candidate and Tea Partier Anna C. Little rhapsodizes the "inalienable rights by our Creator, among them Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness" and touts strict border control as "the first step in the process of regaining control of our Republic." As you read these sentences, your first question is surely: Why do these and other Tea Party candidates hold the rules of capitalization in such contempt?

Capitalizing heavily today is, then, like wearing a tricorn hat or calling your interest group the Tea Party. The point is to hark back to better times, to establish your politics as more authentically American, and to associate yourself with the Founding Fathers. "To restore America we need less Marx and more Madison," Glenn Beck likes to say. More Capitals, less Das Kapital!

What capital-ist Tea Partiers fail to realize, however, is that their orthography imitates not Thomas Jefferson and James Madison but the far-less famous Timothy Matlack and Jacob Shallus—a couple of secretaries. No one played a larger role in crafting the Declaration and the Constitution than Jefferson and Madison, respectively, but it was Matlack and Shallus who hand wrote the official, signed versions of these documents and freely recapitalized them as they saw fit.

(Excerpt) Read more at slate.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: orthography; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last
To: llandres

As a family, we didn’t want to use his name. Or refer to him as the president. The kids especially didn’t want to hear it! I can’t remember which of the kids came up with it, but “He who shall not be named” (from Harry Potter) was used for quite awhile!

As one who was taught to respect the office of the presidency I have a hard time sometimes. Especially when the kids get irate. But then it dawned on me - and I told the kids it too. “It doesn’t make much sense for me to hold on to respecting ‘The Presidency’, when even the president (lowercase!) disrespects it.”


61 posted on 11/02/2010 12:32:49 AM PDT by 21twelve ( You can go from boom to bust, from dreams to a bowl of dust ... another lost generation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
The Obama version is here: The Declaration of Dependence. Cheers!

Wow, Magnum Opus! Well done, well done! Somehow I missed it when you posted it - thanks for pointing it out again. I'm going to pass it on!

62 posted on 11/02/2010 12:33:08 AM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on its own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

“Slate’s writers are falling down on their jobs. Other than a single reference to English’s roots the author didn’t make a comparison to German. I would have expected a few vague comparison of the tea partiers to. general German authoritarianism and at least on direct comparison to Nazis.”

I thought the same thing. I learned nouns are capitalized in German when my homeschooled 13 year old took German at the local university. I thought for sure the author would compare TEA Party members to Nazis. Obviously the author is just uneducated and couldn’t even get the acronym right. Pathetic. What passes for an educated, college graduate...! Oh, that’s right, I spent 2 years hanging out in the university library while my daughter attended classes. I’ve heard the crap that comes out the university student’s mouths.


63 posted on 11/02/2010 12:39:52 AM PDT by pops88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
When exactly did “uppercase” become a verb?

When we weren't paying attention:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/uppercase?show=2&t=1288685503

64 posted on 11/02/2010 1:30:18 AM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: moodyskeptic

No, they just want everything to be common. No propriety.


65 posted on 11/02/2010 3:41:36 AM PDT by grame (May you know more of the love of God Almighty this day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

John Lackman is a Moron.

=:-D


66 posted on 11/02/2010 4:22:46 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

wOw.


67 posted on 11/02/2010 4:25:33 AM PDT by Crawdad (Obamacare will lead to back-alley physicals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

That Obama version is pretty darn funny :)


68 posted on 11/02/2010 8:01:33 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Defund National Peoples Radio!! Democrats are for free speech. Just not for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: dayglored
..."what would the correct verb be for the reverse, taking the first letter of a capitalized word back to lowercase?"

decapitate

69 posted on 11/02/2010 8:07:40 AM PDT by smokingfrog (Because you don't live near a bakery doesn't mean you have to go without cheesecake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

Did you read that in the paypah?


70 posted on 11/02/2010 8:10:22 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
> decapitate

LOL - GREAT!!

71 posted on 11/02/2010 9:29:18 AM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
Must be a slow news day when someone complains about uppercase letters.

He has no argument he can honestly make against the remarks, so he attacks the messenger.

72 posted on 11/02/2010 10:54:55 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (The establishment clause isn't just against my OWN government establishing state religion in America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: moodyskeptic
This passes for wit in liberal circles?

In a halfway sort of a way. :=)

73 posted on 11/02/2010 11:03:50 AM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

“It doesn’t make much sense for me to hold on to respecting ‘The Presidency’, when even the president (lowercase!) disrespects it.”

Not only does he disrespect it (and us, we the people), he’s not legally or constitutionally qualified for it. He should be impeached and imprisoned (along with many of his cronies). The republicans (Pete King and a few other prominent ones) plan to call for many serious investigations. Pray it comes to pass, for the well-being of so many good and patriotic people.


74 posted on 11/02/2010 6:19:39 PM PDT by llandres
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

How appropriate. This little gem is by John Lack Man.


75 posted on 11/02/2010 6:26:19 PM PDT by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson