To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
NO WAY man can control or change what the earth does
To: All
Well we are progressing ...note the last couple of paragraphs.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; WL-law; bamahead; carolinablonde; SolitaryMan; rdl6989; livius; DollyCali; ...
4 posted on
10/20/2010 7:50:02 AM PDT by
steelyourfaith
(ObamaCare Death Panels: a Final Solution to the looming Social Security crisis ?)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Someone needs to tell the Icelandic and other volcanos about this. Maybe the countries’ scientists can put corks in them. /snark
5 posted on
10/20/2010 7:50:31 AM PDT by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
CO2 comprises 0.37% of the earth's atmosphere. The human contribution to atmospheric CO2 has been estimated at less than 4%. The bodies of water that cover more than 75% of the earth's surface are responsible for most of the rest. Even if an effort to reduce the man-made CO2 component by 10% were successful, it would be wildly expensive, reducing the standard of living for much of the population without any noticeable effect on the climate.
7 posted on
10/20/2010 7:58:41 AM PDT by
andy58-in-nh
(America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
So..... if we lower or remove the C02 then the Earth will freeze.
Seems like we need MORE CO2, not less.
8 posted on
10/20/2010 8:00:51 AM PDT by
UCANSEE2
(lame and ill-informed post)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
It works in the models, but the probability that the model replicates all of the mechanisms and variables of the Earth’s climate are very low. Every year we learn more about how the Earth’s climate systems really works and these revelations are not in the models. Nor are the things that remain unknown.
This report is political propaganda, not science.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
new modelI dunno about all that co2 and global warming jive, but this next model might gets you hot and takes your breath away...
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I didn't see anything in there (although it may have been summarized out) about the feedback of more CO2 in the air causing more plant growth thus absorbing more CO2. If not included, I would say that is a fatal shortcoming of the model.
11 posted on
10/20/2010 8:23:10 AM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(Grblb blabt unt mipt speeb!! Oot piffoo blaboo...)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; SunkenCiv; Paul Pierett; neverdem; I got the rope; Marine_Uncle; ...
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; ...
The Sun controls the temperature of the Earth -- not a 300 ppm gas. Thanks Ernest.
13 posted on
10/20/2010 9:05:01 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Models can be made to say whatever you want them to say. Experimental evidence disagrees.
16 posted on
10/20/2010 3:37:53 PM PDT by
3niner
(When Obama succeeds, America fails.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson