Skip to comments.
Study: New Model Says that CO2 Levels Ultimately Control Earth's Temp. ( How about the Oceans ?)
Daily Tech ^
| October 19, 2010 2:15 PM
| Tiffany Kaiser
Posted on 10/20/2010 7:47:27 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
(Source: global-greenhouse-warming.com)
Water vapor and clouds cannot sustain the greenhouse effect on their own
Researchers at NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) have concluded, through the use of a new atmosphere-ocean climate model, that carbon dioxide manipulates Earth's temperature.
Andrew Lacis of the GISS, along with David Rind and other colleagues, studied the Earth's
greenhouse effect, and has concluded that non-condensing greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, ozone, chlorofluorocarbons, nitrous oxide and methane play central roles in the greenhouse effect.
While water vapor and clouds are the major players when it comes to Earth's greenhouse effect, Lacis and his colleagues have found that water vapor and clouds alone could not provide "feedback mechanisms" that help absorb outgoing infrared
radiation without the help of non-condensing
greenhouse gases.
Researchers came to this conclusion by running the
global climate model forward in time without aerosols and non-condensing greenhouse gases. The result was that Earth's greenhouse effect "collapsed." This happened because water vapor precipitated quickly from the atmosphere and created an icebound state on Earth. Lacis concluded that water vapor acts as a feedback process that contributes 50 percent of the greenhouse warming, but cannot sustain the greenhouse effect on its own.
"Our climate modeling simulation should be viewed as an experiment in atmospheric physics, illustrating a cause and effect problem which allowed us to gain a better understanding of the working
mechanics of Earth's greenhouse effect, and enabled us to demonstrate the direct relationship that exists between rising atmospheric carbon dioxide and rising global temperature," said Lacis.
According to the study, this information directly relates to the geologic record which shows that carbon dioxide levels have shifted between 180 parts per million during ice ages to approximately 280 parts per million during warm interglacial periods. Over the past century, there has been a 1 degree Celsius (1.8 Fahrenheit) increase in
global temperature, which means that the mean temperature difference between the ice age and interglacial periods is only approximately 5 degrees Celsius (9 degrees Fahrenheit).
Rind further explains that as carbon dioxide increases, water vapor returns to the atmosphere in larger amounts. Rind says this is what
melted the glaciers that once covered New York City, and that we are in "uncharted territory" today as carbon dioxide levels near 390 parts per million in this "superinterglacial" period.
"The bottom line is that atmospheric carbon dioxide acts as a thermostat in regulating the temperature of the Earth," said Lacis. "The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has fully documented the fact that industrial activity is responsible for the rapidly increasing levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. It is not surprising then that global warming can be linked directly to the observed increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide and to human industrial activity in general."
It is generally recognized that the Earth warms and cools over time. More controversial is the concept that global warming can be human-caused and is currently occurring. The study offers support to this hypothesis.
There are some vocal opinions to the contrary. For instance, renowned physics professor Harold Lewis from the
University of California in Santa Barbara
recently resigned from the American Physical Society in a letter saying that global warming is the "most
successful pseudoscientific fraud" he has seen in his life as a physicist.
"Anyone who has the faintest doubt that this is so should force himself to read the ClimateGate documents, which lay it bare," wrote Lewis. "I don't believe that any real physicist, nay
scientist, can read that stuff without revulsion."
TOPICS: Conspiracy; Science; Weather
KEYWORDS: andrewlacis; climatechange; davidrind; demagogicparty; giss; globalwarminghoax; nasa
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
NO WAY man can control or change what the earth does
To: All
Well we are progressing ...note the last couple of paragraphs.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; WL-law; bamahead; carolinablonde; SolitaryMan; rdl6989; livius; DollyCali; ...
4
posted on
10/20/2010 7:50:02 AM PDT
by
steelyourfaith
(ObamaCare Death Panels: a Final Solution to the looming Social Security crisis ?)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Someone needs to tell the Icelandic and other volcanos about this. Maybe the countries’ scientists can put corks in them. /snark
5
posted on
10/20/2010 7:50:31 AM PDT
by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
To: barbarianbabs
This is from Hansen’s shop ....a firm proponent of reducing the Earth’s population....quickly.
And the West’s capital reserves.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
CO2 comprises 0.37% of the earth's atmosphere. The human contribution to atmospheric CO2 has been estimated at less than 4%. The bodies of water that cover more than 75% of the earth's surface are responsible for most of the rest. Even if an effort to reduce the man-made CO2 component by 10% were successful, it would be wildly expensive, reducing the standard of living for much of the population without any noticeable effect on the climate.
7
posted on
10/20/2010 7:58:41 AM PDT
by
andy58-in-nh
(America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
So..... if we lower or remove the C02 then the Earth will freeze.
Seems like we need MORE CO2, not less.
8
posted on
10/20/2010 8:00:51 AM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(lame and ill-informed post)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
It works in the models, but the probability that the model replicates all of the mechanisms and variables of the Earth’s climate are very low. Every year we learn more about how the Earth’s climate systems really works and these revelations are not in the models. Nor are the things that remain unknown.
This report is political propaganda, not science.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
new modelI dunno about all that co2 and global warming jive, but this next model might gets you hot and takes your breath away...
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I didn't see anything in there (although it may have been summarized out) about the feedback of more CO2 in the air causing more plant growth thus absorbing more CO2. If not included, I would say that is a fatal shortcoming of the model.
11
posted on
10/20/2010 8:23:10 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Grblb blabt unt mipt speeb!! Oot piffoo blaboo...)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; SunkenCiv; Paul Pierett; neverdem; I got the rope; Marine_Uncle; ...
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; ...
The Sun controls the temperature of the Earth -- not a 300 ppm gas. Thanks Ernest.
13
posted on
10/20/2010 9:05:01 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: SunkenCiv
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Like you mentioned to another Freeper... this comes out of Hansen’s shop.
15
posted on
10/20/2010 11:56:02 AM PDT
by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned....)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Models can be made to say whatever you want them to say. Experimental evidence disagrees.
16
posted on
10/20/2010 3:37:53 PM PDT
by
3niner
(When Obama succeeds, America fails.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson