Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CougarGA7
"...This is why the argument that Admiral Richardson felt that Pearl Harbor was vulnerable to attack doesn’t hold water with me.
"Aside from the fact that he said exactly that in his testimony during the Pearl Harbor investigation,..."

Richardson also said it directly to President Roosevelt, around this time in 1940. A few weeks later, White House leaks suggested Richardson will be replaced.

But if you look carefully at the sequence of events leading up to Richardson's firing, one thing that stands out is Richardson's later announcement that he intended to put Pearl Harbor on a war-defensive footing.

14 posted on 10/11/2010 8:13:05 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK

His intention was to put the entire fleet on a war-defensive footing not just the ships at Pearl Harbor. Pearl Harbor is the center of the fleet so it of course becomes the central element of this order. It would curtail the training and put the entire fleet on a more defensive footing. This would also include the Asiatic Fleet which was the small force based in the Philippines and any forces on the West Coast.

A key point to this though in the sequence of things is a shift brought on by events in November. It made the entire naval staff and the Joint Board for that matter take a second look at their current war planning (You think Richardson hates War Plan Orange now, wait a month). As things stand right now, there is no reason to think the Pearl is not completely secure.


16 posted on 10/11/2010 9:43:42 AM PDT by CougarGA7 (It take a village to raise an idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson