Posted on 09/28/2010 3:45:43 PM PDT by Palter
Chemical tests on teeth from an ancient burial near Stonehenge indicate that the person in the grave grew up around the Mediterranean Sea.
The bones belong to a teenager who died 3,550 years ago and was buried with a distinctive amber necklace.
The conclusions come from analysis of different forms of the elements oxygen and strontium in his tooth enamel.
Analysis on a previous skeleton found near Stonehenge showed that that person was also a migrant to the area.
The findings will be discussed at a science symposium in London to mark the 175th anniversary of the British Geological Survey (BGS).
The "Boy with the Amber Necklace", as he is known to archaeologists, was found in 2005, about 5km south-east of Stonehenge on Boscombe Down.
The remains of the teenager were discovered next to a Bronze Age burial mound, during roadworks for military housing.
"He's around 14 or 15 years old and he's buried with this beautiful necklace," said Professor Jane Evans, head of archaeological science for the BGS.
"The position of his burial, the fact he's near Stonehenge, and the necklace all suggest he's of significant status."
Dr Andrew Fitzpatrick, of Wessex Archaeology, backed this interpretation: "Amber necklaces are not common finds," he told BBC News.
"Most archaeologists would say that when you find burials like this... people who can get these rare and exotic materials are people of some importance."
Chemical record
Professor Evans likened Stonehenge in the Bronze Age to Westminster Abbey today - a place where the "great and the good" were buried.
(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.co.uk ...
Maybe the natives kidnapped foreigners, took them to the alter, and performed gruesome sacrificial rites on them before burying them.
Or maybe not. Could be they were sightseeing and caught Druid’s Revenge and died.
Hard to figure out why buried bodies show up that aren’t native to that lonesome area.
The project started when the prehistoric chieftain said, “how many menhir?”
Thanks blam!
Or the craftsmen.
Wasn’t the beaker culture classed as Proto Celts?
or ate....heeerrrreee hoorrrsssseeeyyy
I figure the operational size for both animals was pretty much the same ~ because anything beyond human scale would put them beyond "control".
It's only in modern industrial times that we've gotten into using machinery that dwarfs us, and that's only because we build in OFF SWITCHES. Elephants and horses have an off switch but it's buried under feet of flesh and gone. You need a spear to reach it! Last thing you want is an animal you can't turn off ~ like a bull African elephant rampaging in must.
You PUNished me. How many years in the PUNitentiary is that worth? Pick a cod, any cod at all. That smelt. Why did I say that? Just for the halibut. (You started it.) :)
From Wiki....but the sources look legit.
15 - 16 hands = 60-64 inches tall = 5-6 feet tall at the withers or top of the shoulder.
Elephant = Asian male elephant around 11 feet tall. African elephant 10 to 13 feet at the shoulder.
Nobody has ever seen any evidence (armor or skeleton) of a horse as large as an elephant.
Even the Przewalski horse ?
Your typical horsie is like a chicken!
We are speaking of elephants small enough to be handled in the environment of a military engagement ~ so no large males ~
The Elephant Armor I saw on display was for a full sized Elephant, far larger than any horse ever bred.
I think they preferred the elephants to be male, from what I have read.
I’ll probably keep this up tilapia jected from the forum.
Tilapia? We were ejected ? Wow!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.