Now, if he's reading this thread, let's see if he's smart enough to figure out what the placement of the hyphen does.
I saw this. Our sheriff in Pima County said the same thing. His proof was that there were no Tea Parties before there was a black president.
I just saw that - he looked like a buffoon.
Something tells me that Lamont isn’t very bright. He’s wrong in assuming that kissing the white boys’ butts down at the DNC makes you smart.
Marc Lamont Hill is a 100% total Racist, Communist subversive hate monger. That Fox give him a public forum is a travesty IMHO
Hill is a loser. You know you’ve won an argument with a lib when they pull the race card. That’s the only card Hill plays. I don’t know why O’Bloviator and RedEye have him on so often.
“
Marc Lamont Hill says Tea Partiers are racist
“
O’Reilly should have had a statistician on (say one of the “Freakonomics”
guys) to analyize that study quoted by Hill.
The Freakonomics guy could have blown Hill out of the water!!!
I saw it and I turned it off. I was irritated by O’Reilly giving Hill so much time and a platform for that nonsense. I actually like Hill - don’t agree with him on anything much, but I like him. But what a waste of time this was!
He’s pretty good at dishing out white hate on his Twitter page.
I saw it, too. So I wrote O’Reilly a note asking if I was the only person who remembers the Chimpy McBush-Hitler signs, complete with smirking monkey faces, & asked if they were also racist. Lamont-Hill is such a putz!
He can’t help himself. He’s a liberal.
And no matter how “educated” he may be, he still has that reflexive response built into himself from years of brainwashing.
As expected, Bill did a lousy job of pressing Marc for actual EVIDENCE!!!
Saw it too...pathethic.
Hey bring it on Marc. I call you as racist.
No one's.
Sorry, Lamont. You're time would be better spent p*ssing up a rope.
“Lamont, you big dummy!”
Much less well-known is Hill’s record of involvement in “revolutionary” causes, including support for convicted cop-killer Assata Shakur, a member of the terrorist Black Liberation Army (BLA) now living as a fugitive from justice in Communist Cuba. David Horowitz’s revelation of Hill’s embrace of the terrorist apparently caught FNC officials by surprise.
http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2009/ss_politics0769_09_30.asp
Of course my question would is when Hill calls the Tea Party racist does he mean it as a compliment. If you noticed that at 9 o’clock he and Ann Coulter were on Larry King. Hill on one hand says he’s a far left guy and then out of the other side of his mouth he calls the Tea Party extremist. Thats seem hyocritical to me.
Using the “watch what they do not what they say” theory one can easily see that the Statist know they’ve meant their match in the Tea Party. The racist mantra is a clue as to how liberals debate. The Left say they want a debate. They dont want a debate. They have no interest in a debate. The Left wins their debates (to ther extent that they do) by essentually exterminating conservatives from the discussion. Thats what they’ve been trying to do to Palin and thats the whole point of the obsession over sexual/witchcraft type issues regarding O’Donnell. One can easily see what we have here is a genuine debate between the Tea Party people and the Statist Left about what exactly in the role of the federal government in our lives. We say lets have that debate while The Left’s response is to call us perverted names. Thats who liberals are..