Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

City may curb sales of sugary beverages
Boston . com ^ | September 20, 2010 | Stephen Smith

Posted on 09/22/2010 12:47:32 PM PDT by Cowman

First, it was smoking in restaurants and bars. Then, artery-clogging trans fat in fast food joints and bakeries. Now, Boston health regulators have their crosshairs fixed on soft drinks and other sugar-sweetened beverages sold in city buildings. Concerned about the girth of employees and visitors to government agencies, Boston officials are weighing — gingerly — whether to restrict or even prohibit the sale of calorie-laden refreshments on city-owned property. The city has convened influential health, education, and housing leaders to develop a policy that aims to reduce consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages. While discussions are ongoing, Bill Walczak, head of a community health center and a member of the city’s panel, said, “Somebody has to take a stand, and if it isn’t the government and health care institutions leading the way to a healthier lifestyle, who’s going to do it?’’

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: ban; boston; healthnazis; sodas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
This worked so well in the Twenties.

Government eletist Progressives know so much better than you do how to do absolutely everything in your life.

Well, They can have my Dr Pepper when they pry it ... Well you know

1 posted on 09/22/2010 12:47:36 PM PDT by Cowman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cowman

Why don’t they just ban any no-vegetarian without a PhD from living within the city limits. Then they’d get all of the scum out of there.


2 posted on 09/22/2010 12:52:11 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowman

I’d say they should focus on the one million other problems higher up on their to-do list. Let’s focus and prioritize folks...


3 posted on 09/22/2010 12:57:15 PM PDT by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowman

Typical of the meatheaded bureaucrats in Boston.

We need their help to live a healthy life.

Putzes.


4 posted on 09/22/2010 1:01:27 PM PDT by RexBeach ("There is no such thing as a good tax." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowman
• With apologies to Robert Michum.

Now let me tell a story, I’ll tell it from the top
About a mountain boy that ran illegal soda pop
Coca Cola made the tonic and Junior drove the load
And when his engine roared they called the highway Thunder Road

Sometimes into Worcester Sometimes Old Beantown
The revenuers chased him but they couldn’t run him down
Just when they thought they had him their Prius would explode
And he’d cruise by while they were standing still on Thunder Road

And there was thunder thunder on that Thunder Road
Thunder was his engine Jolt Cola was his load
There was Pepsi Pepsi to quench the devil’s thirst
The people swore they had rights but the Gub’ment took them first
[ guitar ]

Blazin’ right through Sturbridge on down the ol’ Mass Pike
It was just outside of Auburn where they made that fatal strike
They taxed him to death at ninety that’s all there is to tell
The devil sent the Gub ‘mint and they took us straight to hell

5 posted on 09/22/2010 1:11:17 PM PDT by Gordon Pym (2+2=4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowman

Thank God I escaped MA back in ‘95...


6 posted on 09/22/2010 1:18:59 PM PDT by seamusnh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowman

Yanks never learn.


7 posted on 09/22/2010 1:47:04 PM PDT by dbrew2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowman

They can do whatever they want on government property. They want to yank all the soda vending machines out of town hall, police and fire departments? Have at it....

It’s when they intrude on private property and ban products on non-government property - I have an issue.

This health department banned all smoking rooms in hotels in Boston, stripping hotel owners of giving choices to their patrons. They banned smoking on private property loading docks - for goodness sakes. What’s a little sugar syrup between bureaucrats?


8 posted on 09/22/2010 1:50:26 PM PDT by libertarian27 (Ingsoc: Department of Life, Department of Liberty, Department of Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowman

What will they do when this changes nothing? Admit failure or ban more stuff?


9 posted on 09/22/2010 1:56:19 PM PDT by freespirited (This tagline dedicated to the memory of John Armor, a/k/a Congressman Billybob.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowman

Everyday, another idiot attempt at creating 1984 one part at a time.

Do none of these a$$hats read? We need to go back to throwing rotting food at these people in public, and tar and feathers.


10 posted on 09/22/2010 2:18:03 PM PDT by King_Corey (www.kingcorey.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowman

As a caller to Howie Carr show joked yesterday, frequent consumption of soda can lead to a large carbonated footprint.


11 posted on 09/23/2010 8:22:16 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

And by the way if things like smoking are so bad why doesn’t the government just ban tobacco? Oh right...tax revenues...
I can’t see the govt. shutting down Coke or Pepsi either.
But hey, maybe they can increase the tax on these products...
right? Sin taxes, as it were.


12 posted on 09/23/2010 8:24:07 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cowman

“Citizens of Boston, hear me out: This could happen to you.

13 posted on 09/23/2010 8:38:48 AM PDT by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?)...Richard Frank DeCamp, 11/13/34-9/15/10, R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

“These are the times that try men’s souls. In the course of our nation’s history the people of Boston have rallied bravely whenever the rights of men have been threatened. Today a new crisis has arisen. The Boston City Council—better known as “those bahstids at City Hall”—is attempting to levy a burdensome regulation on the population in the form of a ban on non-diet soda. Citizens, hear me out! This could happen to you....’

14 posted on 09/23/2010 12:43:15 PM PDT by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?)...Richard Frank DeCamp, 11/13/34-9/15/10, R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cowman
They can have my Dr Pepper when they pry it ...

I love my Dr. Pepper, too; especially when it's sweetened with real sugar.

15 posted on 09/23/2010 12:48:16 PM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio
But hey, maybe they can increase the tax on these products...

right? Sin taxes, as it were.

Hmmm... Sin taxes... How about a tax on taxes. It has been proven they are economically destructive and by taxing them we would reduce the amount of destruction they cause.

16 posted on 09/23/2010 12:52:54 PM PDT by Cowman (How can the IRS seize property without a warrant if the 4th amendment still stands?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cowman

Probably are—a “surtax” or tax on a tax?

MA put a sales tax on booze recently (ballot question to try and repeal). There already was an excise tax so consumers being taxed twice


17 posted on 09/23/2010 12:56:15 PM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cowman
I'm glad I don't exist in MA...can't say "live" because they need to get a life!

I think this entire sugar, sweets mess is made funnier by the Obamas because they don't appear in public without sucking on an ice cream cone! ...proving Obamas suck!

18 posted on 09/23/2010 1:02:56 PM PDT by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio
MA put a sales tax on booze recently (ballot question to try and repeal). There already was an excise tax so consumers being taxed twice

Not what I mean. I propose a tax on the collection and implementation of taxes. Those taxed would be those who bring the tax into being -- the members of the legislature. If the total tax burden to the average citizen in their district is 30% then the reps would be taxed at twice that or 60%. If this were in place they would be fighting to lower taxes instead of raising them.

Unfortunately they are the ones that would have to put it in place

19 posted on 09/23/2010 1:04:39 PM PDT by Cowman (How can the IRS seize property without a warrant if the 4th amendment still stands?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

ROTFL! I’ll see you at Sculley Square station about a quarter past two. I’ll be there with the case of tonic!


20 posted on 09/23/2010 1:05:57 PM PDT by ssaftler (Californians: Yes on 20, No on 27. No more Jerry-mandering! (Or Jerry-browning either!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson