Jane is the biggest sore loser since Sue Hawk in the first Survivor.
She supposedly watched Survivor for years. She apparently hasn’t been paying attention. People try to avoid taking those to the finals who are certain to beat them.
Supposedly what went down between her and Sash happened in the water..where the sound guy doesn’t go.
SO..........
It could have been sore loser talk..or the truth. Thus, since there is no evidence..it all gets edited out.
I think it must have been this episode because it seemed a disjointed editing...and strange if she was all fired up that she would only go after one person.
It wasn’t clear what kind of tie breaker they would use - as there have been different kinds. If they went for a revote - Dan stood the chance of getting voted out. So, that would be why he wouldn’t change his vote. It could have been a purple rock or fire challenge or revote.
A lot of people think Probst went too far in trying to get these dunces to figure out a strategy when he suggested doing the tie vote.
Next season will have Rob and Russell..two people who know how to play the game and fight hard.
Thia season has a bunch of stupid people...except the one person who is labeled the stupidest..Fabio..may just be an act. He said he studied game play from previous seasons.
Jane had nothing to lose and she did good all through the 37 (?)days; and they did turn against her. She did good killing the fire. Served them right.
I will vote for her being the outstanding player up to this evening.