Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity Fair On Sarah Palin: She Has A Terrible Temper, Is A Bad Tipper
Mediaite ^ | 9/1/10 | Glynis MacNichol

Posted on 09/01/2010 8:55:54 AM PDT by pissant

Two years after entering the nation’s klieg lights Sarah Palin is the subject of a detailed and sometimes scathing profile in next month’s Vanity Fair. The portrait that emerges is one of a willful, often-paranoid, sometimes vengeful woman with a terrible temper and a knack for folksy soundbites, who knows her strengths, saw her moment in the spotlight and has grabbed onto it with both hands. Or as Vanity Fair’s Michael Joseph Gross puts it “anywhere you peel back the skin of Sarah Palin’s life, a sad and moldering strangeness lies beneath.”

(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: howlinginsanity; mittogyny; palin; pissant; pissant4obama; pissant4rinos; pissant4romney; pissogyny; romney; romneydirtytrick; sarahpalin; stenchofromney; vanityfair; wallace4romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: pissant
Andrew Sullivan's remarks in this article are of little consequence and even less of a surprise. He claims she lied when she said she had little experience with a special needs child.

He points out that she had earlier claimed to have some" exposure.

'Palin writes that she immediately thought of a special-needs child she knew very well: her autistic nephew.'

Sullivan says this is an example of a Palin out and out lie.

This represents the level of desperation of Andrew Sullivan and like minded Media types in trashing the former Governor.

These comments are so petty they could have been authored by Allan Colmes who hosts a talk radio show nobody watches and writes books nobody reads.

41 posted on 09/01/2010 9:18:15 AM PDT by wmileo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Glad to see you back, p!


42 posted on 09/01/2010 9:18:15 AM PDT by stylecouncilor (What Would Jim Thompson Do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Made up leftwing fantasies (about Sarah Palin) always deserve to be exposed

If you say so, I would never question your motives. ...you are an honorable man.

43 posted on 09/01/2010 9:18:49 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: pissant

If even one IOTA of this is true, name any male politician who isn’t behaving (actually expected to behave) as bad or worse!


44 posted on 09/01/2010 9:20:07 AM PDT by SMARTY ("What luck for rulers that men do not think." Adolph Hitler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wmileo

Andrew Sullivan’s “trig” musings are enough to demonstrate the man is mentally unbalanced.


45 posted on 09/01/2010 9:20:23 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: pissant

If even one IOTA of this is true, name any male politician who isn’t behaving (actually expected to behave) as badly or worse!


46 posted on 09/01/2010 9:20:23 AM PDT by SMARTY ("What luck for rulers that men do not think." Adolph Hitler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Pissant, it’s time to support candidates that can win. I liked and supported Duncan Hunter, but Governors and occassional Senators or Generals win the Presidency; Congressmen do not (without being VP first). They don’t know how to run the campaign (one example was Hunter’s weak fundraising with huge amounts going to the firm he hired to do it - no state base of donors to build on). Palin has been a Governor, been through a national campaign, draws hugely enthusiastic response from her supporters, and is a conservative. She has supported conservative challengers across the country in primaries to established “moderate” Republicans — witness the Alaska race that was just CONCEDED today. Impossible a month ago — Palin’s conservative candidate wins today. She has avoided losers in those races like Hayworth versus McCain. That is politically astute — not “liberal.” Hayworth was a weak candidate and McCain had the money and the ammuniion from Hayward’s past to crush him. Don’t put yourself in a box in your thinking. Instead be objective and take account of the reality of today’s and tomorrow’s politics.


47 posted on 09/01/2010 9:20:37 AM PDT by November 2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: pissant

When you’re on the left end of the spectrum, anything normal is a a sad and moldering strangeness. At my place in the Liberty part of the spectrum they look like Zombies to me.


48 posted on 09/01/2010 9:21:50 AM PDT by jonrick46 (We're being water boarded with the sewage of Fabian Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: November 2010

Uh, welcome to FR?


49 posted on 09/01/2010 9:21:54 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: pissant

She’s on our side.


50 posted on 09/01/2010 9:23:12 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Thank you : )!


51 posted on 09/01/2010 9:23:18 AM PDT by November 2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

KV’s Doc was sharing a story about his wife and him going to MD conventions and having dinner in upscale dining.

His wife is a dead ringer for Sarah and they both get a kick out of the “great” service/catering and the other guests peeking over when they dine out in the “big City”.

Not that there is any connection to this thread just popped into my mind.

Megan McCain/Vanity fair ect...all doing anti Sarah crap throwing right now.

As I said before the little twit McCain needs to do something relevant like Dancing with the Stars.

We were LOL at her saying she agrees with most everything Sarah does except she is pro abort and pro homosexual agenda.

Well ya dumb big mouth twit those are 2 huge issues to not agree on.

We really really like Sarah but her now of age daughter going on Dancing with the Stars and saying she is doing it to get away from the drama in Alaska. WTH!

I bet Sarah and family end up raising the grand kid.

It might be best. Curious who is caring for her kid while she is in hollywood and the sperm donor is off trying to reclaim his 7 mins of fame.


52 posted on 09/01/2010 9:24:29 AM PDT by Global2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pissant
sad and moldering strangeness

BWAHAHAHAHAHAhahahahahahaha! ! ! ! ! ! !

Actually, that's Vanity Fair rotting away on grocery store shelves!

53 posted on 09/01/2010 9:27:23 AM PDT by grobdriver (Proud Member, Party Of No! No Socialism - No Fascism - Nobama - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Sarah and friends.....
54 posted on 09/01/2010 9:27:33 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
“Update: Ben Smith thinks you should take this piece with a grain of salt: ‘[M]y takeaway from the magazine piece is more that you can really write anything about Palin.’”
55 posted on 09/01/2010 9:28:53 AM PDT by RichInOC (Palin 2012: The Perfect Storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: November 2010
...Hayworth was a weak candidate and McCain had the money and the ammuniion from Hayward’s past to crush him...

I was with you up until this point. Hayworth ran a respectable campaign. McCain just plain outspent him (with funds left over from his failed presidential campaign which there should be a campaign finance law against).

56 posted on 09/01/2010 9:29:54 AM PDT by McGruff (How's that Hopey Changey thingy workin for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

ROFL. When even libtard Smith disses your article, you know you’ve hit rock bottom.


57 posted on 09/01/2010 9:31:57 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Almost everything here, could be applied to Herself, the Cold and Joyless, one-time Presidential candidate, and currently Secretary of State (understand Herself got the job because the now failing obama regime thought she could take shorthand).

The more extreme forms of projection, trying to picture opposition as bearing the same faults as the champions of the ones making the assertions, is an old technique, probably well practiced in the days of Byzantium and the House of Medici. And the outcome did not bode well for those who practiced the art of projection.

This caricature of Sarah Palin is almost too indistinct to ever let through the true light that fills and illuminates the sphere in which she walks. Sarah is none of these things of which the author of this piece has tried to paint her, which probably means, she has hit a very tender nerve and they don’t like it, not one bit.


58 posted on 09/01/2010 9:32:22 AM PDT by alloysteel ("If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

The only sad and moldering strangeness I can see is the hit piece in Vanity Fair. What a crock!!


59 posted on 09/01/2010 9:32:59 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Exactly. If you are a political analyst, and Palin seems to be the best one out there right now based on her results, you have to factor money into the equation. I’m not saying anything bad about Hayworth. I’m saying McCain had ammo from Hayworth’s past and McCain’s money gave him a big enough gun to use it effectively. I would have liked to see McCain lose just because he didn’t go after Obama in the same way. And Palin was smart as a whip not to support Hayworth and lose against a sitting Senator, who will be sitting again when she runs for President, and who launched her to national prominence. Sarah Palin’s results are not just luck. She’s smart politically. Very smart. I hesitate to say how smart she seems to be after these “impossible” victories and these “tempting” defeats that she avoided.


60 posted on 09/01/2010 9:34:54 AM PDT by November 2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson