Posted on 08/25/2010 3:41:47 AM PDT by Swordmaker
I have to constantly remind myself that sales estimates can be all over the place, so when a recent report suggested Macs sales weren’t improving as fast as some expected, I was ready to attribute that state of affairs to the extreme success of the iPad.
However, it now appears that Mac sales may actually be growing faster than previously believed.
There’s a story in this week’s issue of Fortune that, in June, sales of new Macs to the enterprise actually soared nearly 50%, about three times higher than the rest of the PC industry. In addition, sales to government soared 200%, which is 16 times faster than the rest of the market.
At the same time, sales to consumers improved by roughly 35%, so it’s clear Macs aren’t losing their luster for home users either.
But the enterprise? Now maybe it’s just a statistical blip, since Apple has such a small market penetration in the business world. Perhaps the same is true for government users, but maybe, just maybe, so many business users are sick and tired of the ongoing problems with Windows that they’re looking for an exit plan. Sure, perhaps Windows 7 is far better than its predecessors, but when Microsoft can only list such silliness as pinning document windows on the corners of the screen as one of the most compelling new features, you just know that they have nothing important to say.
But what’s most fascinating is the fact that this is all happening when the iPad seems to be selling far more copies than anyone expected. At the same time, are new iPad users buying them as extra devices, or are sales being cannibalized from other products?
If the latter, just what products are we talking about? Macs? Evidently not, unless you want to argue that far more Macs would otherwise be sold. PCs? Perhaps, since sales of new PCs, outside of the business market, haven’t gone so well this summer, particularly in the netbook category.
Of course, you have to realize that a netbook is not a terribly inviting product. There’s not an ounce of innovation to be found. All the PC makers did was to shrink notebooks down as small as they can, and use cheaper components, including slow processors. It’s hard to take a $300 netbook and expect it to offer anything close to credible performance for all but the most basic tasks. Everything is a compromise.
The iPad is a totally different product with extremely snappy performance and a smart, intuitive interface that actually takes the PC into a whole new dimension. Consider that, until the iPad came out, no other PC maker had a clue what to do about tablets. After touting the arrival of tablet PCs 10 years ago, the best Microsoft could so was to deliver a clumsy alternative to the regular Windows computer with a stylus to click buttons on the screen.
Watching one of these tablets in action certainly demonstrates how bad they are, and why they have been abject failures outside of certain business categories.
Our family doctor, for example, has a network of Fujitsu tablet computers in his office. The doctor and his assistants carry them around while examining patients and consulting records. They employ the ever-present stylus to activate functions using a special vertical market application that’s designed for physicians. But actual text is still entered via the keyboard. We’re not talking about an iPhone-styletouch interface here, but a kludge based totally on a traditional PC that employs a stylus in place (or in addition to) a touchpad or mouse.
It’s no wonder such devices didn’t catch on for the vast majority of users.
Of course, now that the iPad has been a proven success even early in its lifetime, the rest of the PC world is madly scrambling to deliver a credible competitor. But so far rather than deliver product, they are delivering hype. Claims mean nothing without a powerful product lineup to demonstrate they can truly deliver the goods.
Consider that recent silly statement from Chang Ma, vice president of marketing for LG Electronics’ mobile-devices unit, who praised the iPad and then promised they could build a better tablet. All this without any evidence that LG can develop an operating system that comes close to matching the iOS. Or maybe they plan to rely on the forthcoming Google Chrome OS, but that would put the LG tablet computer in the same range as other products using a Google-based OS. Where’s the differentiation?
Indeed, why are members of the mainstream press taking anything Chang Ma says seriously? Does he have experience in this product category that he can point to in order to prove his claims? Not a chance.
With all this nonsense, you don’t have to wonder why more and more businesses have opted to order the real thing: a Mac.
RE: Given the political leanings of Apple’s executives and directors..
As opposed to Microsoft which is a tool of every liberal agenda including UN population control. GMAFB!
As opposed to somebody like Dell. Microsoft doesn't sell computers. If you want a FB then quit hoarding them.
Diffusional.
Buy a Dill and you are buying Microsoft and its liberal anti-life liberal agenda.
Piss off nimrod.
You can give somebody like Michael Dell a bunch of money and MS a little bit of it, or you can give Apple a bunch of money and then give MS a bunch of money, too.
Choose, nimrod.
All computer company CEOs are Liberals.
The rest of your rant is pure speculation ... as usual.
See post 24, then do your homework. I’ll wait for the apology.
It’ll be a cold day in hell when you get an apology from me as I see you as an Apple troll. Let’s just say 99% are Liberals ... can we say Bill Gates.
You post is pure SPECULATION. Or perhaps you would like to prove it.
It’s just a box of switches. It’s not going to love you back.
Mindless chatter again ...
The Dell, inc. Political Action Committee (FEC link)
Boxer, Feinstein, Murray, Reid, Rangel, Leahy, Schumer and the Blue Dog PAC are among the recipients.
Cute.
By your own logic, buy a Dell and you buy the Dell Inc. PAC regardless as to whether it is employees or corporate. The employees get paid by Dell and then turn around and spread their liberal dollars.
They do. But my logic takes into consideration that some of the money will also get spent on conservative candidates and causes.
Yours says that because you can find at least some support in any company for liberal candidates and causes then it's irrelevant who you buy from because they're all the same politically.
Must be why you do it.
That the best you’ve got?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.