Posted on 08/22/2010 7:30:37 AM PDT by chatter4
Video-Barack Hussein Obama Sr. was born on April 4, 1936 and died November 24, 1982. He was 5 years old when WW II started, and 9 years old when it ended. Lolo Soetoro (Obama's step father) born on January 2, 1935 and died March 2, 1987. He was 6 years old when WW II started, and 10 years old when it ended. In this clip from June 28, 2008, Barry claimed his father served in WWII. Was he telling us the truth? Was Stanley A. Dunham really his father?
How would a white teenage girl even know about a black hooker being pregnant in 1960?
sorry, you’ve lost me.
Isn’t this theory about a black hooker’s baby?
No, it does not dry up at all. In the eyes of the law, the legal father’s citizenship determines the citizenship of the newborn child, not the citizenship of any purported natural fathers who are not also the legal father. In like manner an orphaned child found in the United States with no known citizenship is deemed to be a native born citizen of the United States.
Its a theory about who is the real father and mother of our 44th President. Its an explanantion as to why this president spends $million$ of dollars to keep his past hidden from view. Its about the inconsistencies and deceptions that permeate the birth story of this president. Its an attempt to fill in the blanks of a void that no one in the early life of Barry Soetoro is willing to fill.
When a married man comes home and says, “Dear, I've gotten a prostitute knocked up,” almost every married women will say, “That's nice dear, you'll be hearing from my lawyer within the week concerning the divorce.” Even more likely if the prostitute in question is black, and the married man and woman are white, in the fifties and early sixties. If you aren't old enough to remember the fifties and early sixties, trust me.
If by some miracle the woman doesn't head right to the divorce lawyer, she would be sent there by the next sentence: “We'll have our only daughter pretend that she was impregnated by some black man she hardly knows and raise the child as her own for us.”
Cock and bull story.
What a space case, is this theory about Obama being a black hooker’s kid?
It remains to be demonstrated that Barack Hussein Obama was born with ANY U.S. citizenship. We already know for a fact he was born with the United Kingdom of Great Britain citizenship of his mother’s declaration of legal father, the late Barack Hussein Obama. We alraedy know his mother was one year too young to confer her own U.S. citizenship upon her son by right of inheritance. What we have no properly documented evidence for is a birthright by jus soli conferring a native born U.S. citizenbship. If he was born on U.S. soil as a native born citizen and is eventually proven to be so, being a native born citizen still does not qulaify Barack Hussein Obama as a natural born citizen, which requires his father, meaning his legally declared father, to be a U.S. citizen at the time the child was born.
To quote posts 40 and 58.
“In old school America, I don’t think that the way to conceal daddy liking black hookers and keeping it on the down low, was to assign their black babies to their white daughters.”
“Since when was the solution to a pregnant black hooker in 1960, for the white john to take the baby and pawn it off as his daughter’s offspring from a black husband?
That sure doesn’t fit my memory of the times.”
Yes..a remarkable resemblance.
I read somewhere that Stanley Ann was in the same area as Malcolm X when she got knocked up.
Thank God there are some people on the thread with common sense. I am very glad I was not the only one.
It's the angle and the morphing of one picture to another. In other photos there's not much resemblance at all.
I read somewhere that Stanley Ann was in the same area as Malcolm X when she got knocked up.
Malcolm was in Seattle for the World's Fair. But that happened in 1962, after Barack Obama was already born. I haven't seen any evidence yet that he was in Hawaii or Seattle or Kansas or any place she might have been in 1960 or 1961.
Yep, as I said, I don’t put any credence in this stuff, but I put even less in a black prostitute knowing who knocked her up.
I agree, they look like twins.
But Zero bears a SRIKING REDEMBLANCE to Stanley Dubahm, the grandfather. Same face shape, same ears — thee is no way that those two are not releated.
.
The subject video.
Clear as a bell and totally natural conversational flow .. 'my father served in WWII.'
now that is interesting.
What does that have to do with this situation? We aren't talking about a white girl giving up her baby to adoption to conceal her shame, we are talking about a white girl taking a black baby from dad's hooker and pretending to be it's mother to save a black hooker from "social stigma", does that make sense to you?
Not that I subscribe to the "black girl and Grandpa Dunham" theory. I have my own theory as I earlier posted above. Be that as it may, if it actually occurred, all of the above would make sense, although not because of social stigma.
Many people firmly believe in the concept that blood is thicker than water.
In medical school, medical students are in demand for "donations" to the Sperm Bank. A prospective mother wants a "smart" donor? Donor 346 was smart enough to succeed in medical school. My medical school roommate was a regular donor. As far as siring offspring, he was right up there with Man-o-War.
It was an easy way to make money but I never considered it.
Why? Because having your own flesh and blood being raised somewhere by an unknown stranger just felt wrong.
Perhaps Grandpa Dunham felt the same way. He could not bear to have his own flesh and blood adopted out and raised by an unknown stranger, never to be seen again.
But, would a daughter trouble herself so for the concept that blood is thicker than water? Even in the case of her father's illegitimate son?
Before Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor and King of Spain died, he let it be known by a codicil in his will providing financial support and showing great interest in the future welfare of an unknown boy that he probably had an illegitimate son by a German mistress. That illegitimate son had, in fact, been raised in Spain, as a regular Spanish boy, in a town outside of Madrid, by one of Charles' friends, Don Luis de Quijada, without the boy or anybody in the town having any knowledge of the boy's origins.
After he was King of Spain, Philip II summoned Don Luis de Quijada and the truth came out about his father's illegitimate son. Philip then asked Don Luis to bring the boy to a hunt. (Accidents happen on hunts all the time, ya know.)
Don Luis brought the boy, and told him to bow as the man in front of him was His Majesty, the King. King Philip asked the boy if he knew who his father was and the embarrassed boy answered, "No".
Philip then embraced the boy, told him that they shared the same father and were thus brothers. Philip treated the boy as a brother for the rest of his life.
The boy grew up to be Don Juan of Austria and destroyed Islamic sea power in the Mediterranean when he annihilated the Turkish fleet at the Battle of Lepanto
All because King Philip II believed, even in the case of his father's illegitimate children, that blood was thicker than water.
So, the conduct does make sense.
Where the "black girl and Gandpa Dunham" theory runs into trouble is how to explain that Grandma Dunhan had no problem with her alleged gradson. Stanley Ann Dunham would have had to go away for a while and then come back with, "Surprise, Mom! I have a mixed race child!"
If somebody on the Left reads this thread, they will claim that we are kooks with "conspiracy theories".
In reality, it is a documented fact that Obama has spent a considerable amount of time, money and effort to hide the original entries in his original birth certificate.
We are just having fun playing the game "Try to guess what Obama is trying so hard to hide and why".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.