Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Keeper of the Flame"
Turner Classic Movies ^ | 8/20/2010 | princess leah

Posted on 08/20/2010 5:12:20 PM PDT by princess leah

I just finished watching the most interesting film on TCM starring Spencer Tracy and Katheryn Hepburn about a widow who's husband was a patriot and a report who tries to get to the bottom of the story about how he died and winds up making a startling discovery.

The discovery rings so close to what is happening right now in America it is scary. It talked about this hero (Robert Forrest) who had been built up by advertising, by reporters, by media to become an Icon and beneath it was a corp group of people setting up a facsist gov't, through pitting peoples prejudices against each other and festering them into "hate" groups. The ironic thing is that this movie was made in 1942!


TOPICS: Free Republic Policy/Q&A
KEYWORDS: donaldogdenstewart; keeperoftheflame

1 posted on 08/20/2010 5:12:21 PM PDT by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: princess leah

Interesting...bttt


2 posted on 08/20/2010 5:16:02 PM PDT by TEXOKIE (Anarchy IS the strategy of the forces of darkness!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: princess leah
Keeper of the Flame (Wikipedia)

Keeper of the Flame (Internet Movie Database)

3 posted on 08/20/2010 5:28:43 PM PDT by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: princess leah

I watched the last hour of the movie and it was a bit convoluded.


4 posted on 08/20/2010 5:29:43 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: princess leah
Just FYI: the screenwriter was known to be a leftist -- Louis B. Mayer (the studio head) hired him for that reason. Mayer apparently regretted it, and stormed out of the New York City premiere, "enraged at the way the film seemed to equate wealth with fascism".

Republican members of Congress apparently felt the film bordered on propaganda, and demanded future guidelines from the Hays Commission.

5 posted on 08/20/2010 5:37:19 PM PDT by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

Interesting!


6 posted on 08/20/2010 7:57:08 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: justlurking
Yes, this is an old leftie, delusional, nightmare movie. The plot is really stupid. Blatant leftwing propaganda.

In the film, Katherine Hepburn loyally tries to cover up her rich and powerful husband's right-wingism which has somehow managed to endanger the country and perhaps the world. I believe that the husband has died, and she is protecting his memory.

This movie was made when the Soviet Union was the huge and overwhelming threat to the entire world, yet it pretended that massive danger came exclusively from some phony, right-wing boogeyman types. It was very similar to the recent Obamunists attempt to depict fictional, rightwing terror groups in the U.S. today in order to deflect public attention from Muslim terrorism. Katherine Hepburn was an east-coast-background, Hollywood liberal and was happy to star in this ridiculous film.

7 posted on 08/20/2010 8:03:14 PM PDT by elisheba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: elisheba

Okay, I didn’t read the post closely enough to take note of the date of the film. I apologize. Wikipedia says 1943, but that still would put the film in the early stage of WWII and not in the 50s, which was my memory from seeing the film. Takes away from some of my point since Hitler, along with Stalin, threatened the world at the time the movie was made. I view Hitler as a leftist along with Stalin, but obviously many do not. Sorry.


8 posted on 08/20/2010 8:10:17 PM PDT by elisheba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: princess leah

Is this the one FrogDad is watching, has Lucille Ball in it, too?


9 posted on 08/20/2010 8:32:21 PM PDT by FrogMom (No such thing as an honest democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elisheba
This movie was made when the Soviet Union was the huge and overwhelming threat to the entire world, yet it pretended that massive danger came exclusively from some phony, right-wing boogeyman types.

Actually, this movie was made when Nazi Germany and Japan were the threat. Production began in 1942 and it premiered in 1943.

Katherine Hepburn was an east-coast-background, Hollywood liberal and was happy to star in this ridiculous film.

Hepburn was in the midst of an affair with Spencer Tracy -- the star of the film, and insisted on being cast over the objections of MGM executives. She divorced her husband during post-production.

10 posted on 08/20/2010 8:58:30 PM PDT by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: princess leah
Did this movie have some similarities to Meet John Doe?
11 posted on 08/22/2010 10:13:47 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson