and the RATS, take another one in the..............................HA ha!!!
Hee hee! And Mann will prolly still stand behind his stupid hockey stick! Lol!
And I may be mistaken, but they are still ignoring the heat island affect and changing environment around many of our surface temperature reading stations. Or how many in colder climates have gone off line.
Going thru the comments...found this:
*****************************************
Aldi says:
“Our backcasting methods, which track quite closely the methods applied most recently in Mann (2008) to the same data, are unable to catch the sharp run up in temperatures recorded in the 1990s, even in-sample.”
Hide the decline? The recorded data has been *massaged*, most climate scientists are riding the gravy train(engaged in fraud).
******************************************************
Now comparing the first graph ....of Mann...notice that the LEFT hand side is somewhat level.....
Now look at the second Graph...and the LEFT hand side starts at a much higher level...and declines to the right before the uptick....
The statisticians probably worked long and hard on that one ~ two minutes anyway ~ and snorted.
Uh oh! “ a bayesian backcast method.”????
I’m clueless! Can someone explain?
The consensus of scientists who make money on global warming all agree that global warming is real. The debate is over. Move along now. There is nothing to see.
Monckton: Why current trends are not alarming ( RE:Global Warming)
This morning when I read it at WUWT there was only 85 comments. Now there is over 335.
Hockey stick FAIL!
I read this over the weekend. Good stuff. We have all known about this for some time, but we finally have “professionals” investigating the stats.
Global Warming on Free Republic
Very interesting, I think it might still dismay some here to see that this model still shows a warming trend, just not the hockey stick from before.