Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

8-Month-Old Baby Attacked By Pit Bull
WSBTV ^

Posted on 08/07/2010 12:09:52 AM PDT by Chet 99

Updated: 6:39 pm EDT August 6, 2010

CLAYTON COUNTY, Ga. -- An 8-month-old girl was in critical condition after being attacked by the family’s pit bull, Clayton County police said.

The toddler was taken to Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Egleston, where she was rushed into surgery.

An officer at the scene told Channel 2 Action News reporter Tom Jones that the area in the home where the girl was attacked looked like a crime scene.

Officers said the baby's mother was in the process of feeding the child and the dog at the same time. The baby somehow got out of her high chair and onto the floor near the dog. Officers said the dog then attacked the baby, biting off her diaper and chunks of skin on her buttocks. The dog then dragged the child to the back yard before the baby's mother managed to snatch the baby away.

Family members declined to comment as they let the home. Police cited the dog's owner, a great uncle of the victim, for prohibitive treatment of the dog and for not having vaccination tags.

Homeowners said the dog has been a menace to the neighborhood for awhile.

Alfred Nelson said he was killing fire ants in his yard one day when the dog started racing toward him in a threatening manner.

“So I went and grabbed me a shovel and came back out. I immediately called 911 and had 911 send animal control out here to do their job. This all would have been avoided,” Nelson claimed.

The dog will be quarantine for 10 days to see if it has rabies.


TOPICS: Pets/Animals
KEYWORDS: irresponsibleowner; irresponsibleparent; neuroticposter; pitbull
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last
To: Joe 6-pack

When a pit bull maims or kills a person, running to the government for protection shouldn’t “solve the problem” that the owner and the beast should face.


61 posted on 08/09/2010 2:58:26 PM PDT by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: solosmoke
You want names? I’m sorry but I don’t know them personally.

You have to know them personally to give their names? Is that some strange pit bull cult belief?

Or are your frequently invoked yet unnamed "experts" simply imaginary?

62 posted on 08/09/2010 3:01:32 PM PDT by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
"When a pit bull maims or kills a person, running to the government for protection shouldn’t “solve the problem” that the owner and the beast should face."

No...folks like you just want to ban the problem altogether. Look how well that's worked in England, where they banned pitbulls almost 20 years ago. Of course, like their national healthcare, firearms bans, knife bans, etc. tyrants like you won't acknowledge the abject failure, but merely insist that you know how to do it better.

63 posted on 08/09/2010 3:06:34 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
folks like you just want to ban the problem altogether.

Nope. But apologists like you just want to ignore the problem altogether.

64 posted on 08/09/2010 3:36:31 PM PDT by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
LOL...just where do you get that idea? "Apologists" like me want to see the people who failed to exercise their responsibilities held to greater account than they currently are...it's better for the dogs and society as a whole.

Now seriously, it's ok to admit you'd like to embrace euro-trash, government controls on society...it really is ok to believe that, because in spite of people like you, this still is a nominally free country. I'm not sure that makes this forum the best place for you, but hey...I'm not going to tell anybody what's best for them. I guess that's where we differ.

65 posted on 08/09/2010 3:42:52 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
"Apologists" like me want to see the people who failed to exercise their responsibilities held to greater account than they currently are...

Okay. What should be the greater penalty be for someone who keeps a pit bull in a residential neighborhood?

66 posted on 08/09/2010 3:47:36 PM PDT by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

Did you not bother to read those links? I’m pretty sure they’re not hiding from you. Why not just read the information on the links?
Here’s what I pulled up from just glancing over it. This is the page listing the advisors for the National Canine Research Council, as well as their accomplishments:

http://nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/home/ncrc-advisors/

I can try to find the rest for you later when I get home, but feel free to look around those links. I am sure all the information you require is right there, and all you have to do is read it.

Also, I would appreciate if you stopped trying to insult me. It really doesn’t do what you think it does.


67 posted on 08/09/2010 3:50:43 PM PDT by solosmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: solosmoke

If two names are too much for you, how about one? Just name one of these (probably imaginary) experts.


68 posted on 08/09/2010 3:56:27 PM PDT by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
"What should be the greater penalty be for someone who keeps a pit bull in a residential neighborhood?"

That sir, is the difference between you and me. Somebody who keeps a pitbull in a residential neighborhood, who keeps their dog under control on their property, and who never harms or threatens another person should not be subject to any penalty at all. That's how freedom works.

69 posted on 08/09/2010 6:12:07 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Mojave; solosmoke
"Just name one of these (probably imaginary) experts."

How about Cesar Milan...?


70 posted on 08/09/2010 6:16:17 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
Somebody who keeps a pitbull in a residential neighborhood, who keeps their dog under control on their property, and who never harms or threatens another person should not be subject to any penalty at all.

Just wait until the pit bull maims or kills a neighbor's child. So by your "reasoning" somebody who drives drunk in a residential neighborhood, who keeps their car in their lane, and who never runs over another person should not be subject to any penalty at all.

That sir, is the difference between you and me

Indeed. I respect the rule of law, you don't.

71 posted on 08/09/2010 6:16:34 PM PDT by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Posted on the Pit Bull Chat Community:

http://www.pitbull-chat.com/showthread.php?t=2878

By Denise Flaim
Newsday

If anyone is considered the demon boy of dog behavior by the professional training community, it would be Cesar Millan, whose “Dog Whisperer” show on the National Geographic Channel has made him a household name.

Millan’s techniques, his approach — and, let’s face it, his popularity — have stoked the ire of many positive trainers and behaviorists, who offer laundry lists of his inadequacies: His methods are inappropriately force-based. His academic credentials are nonexistent. He relies too heavily on antiquated models of wolf hierarchy and dominance. His success stories cannot be replicated by regular dog owners.


72 posted on 08/09/2010 6:21:05 PM PDT by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
You're going to throw your back out if keep up the contortions.

"So by your "reasoning" somebody who drives drunk in a residential neighborhood, who keeps their car in their lane, and who never runs over another person should not be subject to any penalty at all."

DUI is against the law, as is failing to maintain control of your dog. Both should be enforced with similar vigor. By your "reasoning" we should ban liquor and cars.

"I respect the rule of law, you don't."

No. If you did, you'd want people to be held accountable in front of existing law, not pass new "feel good" laws that have been abject failures where they've already been implemented...but don't let the facts and empirical data get in the way while you're embracing your inner-tyrant.

73 posted on 08/09/2010 6:22:07 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
DUI is against the law

As are pit bulls in some jurisdictions. Nice foot shot.

74 posted on 08/09/2010 6:24:13 PM PDT by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
"As are pit bulls in some jurisdictions."

Which is my precise point...the bans have been abject failures where enacted. See my link in #63.

75 posted on 08/09/2010 6:26:49 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

Denise Flaim is an AKC breed purist. You don’t think she’d have an agenda in “flaiming” Milan, an advocate of adoption? Probably cuts into her bottom line.


76 posted on 08/09/2010 6:30:13 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

Apparently, you like to ignore the facts. I just gave you a link to SEVERAL people, all of which I would consider experts. Here are some more for you:

Dr. Howard Evans -Canine Anatomy (http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/Nov06/Evans.profile.jg.html )

Dr. Sandy DeLahunta- Canine Neurologist (http://www.vet.cornell.edu/news/articles/08DeLahunta.htm )

Dr. Katherine Houpt- Dog Behaviorist (http://www.vet.cornell.edu/faculty/houpt/ )

Dr. Brady Barr (measured bite pressure for several types of dogs, which can be seen on the National Geographic website)

Dr. Ian Dunbar, Veterinarian and animal behaviorist (http://www.siriuspup.com/about_founder.html )

Dr. Karen Overall, who has too many degrees to name (http://abrionline.org/expert.php?id=21)

Nathan Winograd, graduate of Stanford Law School, author, and speaker dealing with animal welfare (http://www.nathanwinograd.com/?page_id=179 )


77 posted on 08/09/2010 6:32:28 PM PDT by solosmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
the bans have been abject failures where enacted.

Britain isn't a jurisdiction in the United States. Read a book.

78 posted on 08/09/2010 6:32:54 PM PDT by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: solosmoke

That sure took long enough. Let’s start with the first one, Howard Evans. When did this expert claim “that the number of fatalities in America isn’t disproportional to that breed?”


79 posted on 08/09/2010 6:35:48 PM PDT by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

“Just wait until the pit bull maims or kills a neighbor’s child. “<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Therein lies the quandary. The percentage of pit bulls that DO harm people is less than 1%. You are basing your entire opinion on the idea that the other 99% are the same, which they obviously aren’t. If the 10 million living pit bulls all of a sudden BECAME the dogs you think they are, then we would have a serious problem, and you would see fatalities go up dramatically. Fortunately, that is not the case.


80 posted on 08/09/2010 6:37:19 PM PDT by solosmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson