Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leonardo DiCaprio Pulling Out Of Mel Gibson Movie
Radar Online ^ | 07/29/2010

Posted on 07/29/2010 3:55:40 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-137 last
To: Sacajaweau
He can't compare to the old timers who have passed OR MEL.

Maybe if DiCaprio beat up his girlfriend?

121 posted on 07/30/2010 5:53:25 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
"Russell Crowe could play a convincing Viking."

Although it was sympathetic to moslems in a pre-9/11 kind of way, I thought the Viking cast of Michael Crichton's "The 13th Warrior" was pretty convincing. Perhaps Mel ought to round up that gang.

122 posted on 07/30/2010 6:04:07 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Maybe if he had a girlfriend....


123 posted on 07/30/2010 6:08:26 AM PDT by usmcobra (NASA outreach to Muslims if I were in charge:The complete collection of "I dream of Jeannie" on DVD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Mel Gibson aside, I really don't get the fascination with DeCaprio.

He is not handsome (has a round head) and is kind of girly.

He is bland as an actor IMO and I really can't see him as a compelling Viking.

Where are all the men in Hollywood?

124 posted on 07/30/2010 7:12:52 AM PDT by Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra
Maybe if he had a girlfriend....

I understand Mel had one that DiCaprio can have. Of course she's a little beat up, but I'm sure she runs just fine.

125 posted on 07/30/2010 7:20:25 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Aurorales

apparently you missed the words “i bet”. clearly a disclaimer that it is not fact, but merely highly probable in my estimation.


126 posted on 07/30/2010 9:06:26 AM PDT by sappy (criminallibs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

That’s my opinion, too. Not every choice isa political one, even in Hollywood. I bet most choices are decided on fiscal grounds.


127 posted on 07/30/2010 9:13:23 AM PDT by worst-case scenario (Striving to reach the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Spoken like a true “virile” “alpha male” who just can’t be “tamed to exclusivity” by any female no longer of gestational age. The procreative urge is apparently even stronger than any religious belief or vow before God.

What I can’t understand is whether you think that the second woman was a pure “golddigger,” or just the woman willing to provide her fecund womb to the Uber-male Mel. Since apparently reproduction trumps all social mores in your explanation of Mel’s behavior, why doesn’t he just get a harem of non-demanding women to bear his babies? They can shut up and be grateful that he impregnates them and lets them “suck his c@ck,” as he demanded in his drunken (as you believe) phone call.

Sorry, bud, you sound like so many guys I’ve worked with or met in bars who excuse their sneaky infidelities on the grounds that their wives are trying to domesticate them but their virility just can’t be kept in a little married cage. I’m not saying that’s what YOU do - just that you sound like them. All self-justifying blather to make excuses for the fact that they are too selfish to keep their wedding vows.

It may not always be easy to do when you’re a man, but that’s the pledge I took, and that’s the one I’v kept. Gibson seems to be just lost right now, which happens to so many guys when they cheat and leave. Their second and third marriages have an even higher rate of failure than their first.

It’s too bad; he was talented.


128 posted on 07/30/2010 9:25:22 AM PDT by worst-case scenario (Striving to reach the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: worst-case scenario

I don’t favor polygamous societies. But I do see that through history the goal of many powerful men is to spread their genes. I once read that 10% of Mongolians have Genghis Khan ancestry. By having seven children with Robin, Mel Gibson is telling you something. He got into a mess with the Russian tramp but that’s what he was doing if even subconsciously. If you think he was after her just for romance and sex you are wrong. It was to make more mini-Mels. Mel is a great guy and not some kind of degenerate spreading his seed anywhere. He wanted more children just as other men have down through history. You cannot repeal biology. You can try and channel it into monogamy and this is part of the goal of Judaism and Christianity. Though the bible is full of prophets with multiple wives, concubines and sexual liaisons. In fact there is a ton of genealogy in the Old Testament


129 posted on 07/30/2010 11:43:33 AM PDT by dennisw (Sarah McLachlan in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
I thought the Viking cast of Michael Crichton's "The 13th Warrior" was pretty convincing. Perhaps Mel ought to round up that gang.

Somehow that movie slipped right past me. Never even heard of it. I'll have to see if DirecTV is showing it or rent a copy.

130 posted on 07/30/2010 12:14:43 PM PDT by TigersEye (Greenhouse Theory is false. Totally debunked. "GH gases" is a non-sequitur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
"Somehow that movie slipped right past me. Never even heard of it. I'll have to see if DirecTV is showing it or rent a copy."

It's worth a little bit of effort tracking down...it's based on Crichton's "Eaters of the Dead"

131 posted on 07/30/2010 12:23:32 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Sounds interesting. I’m always up for a good warrior/adventure movie.


132 posted on 07/30/2010 12:33:36 PM PDT by TigersEye (Greenhouse Theory is false. Totally debunked. "GH gases" is a non-sequitur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

It didn’t get a lot of critical acclaim, but I thought it was a pretty cool flick. If you find it, let me know what you think!


133 posted on 07/30/2010 12:40:30 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: sappy
So everything is fine if you put in that "i bet" disclaimer. OK

Sappy is honored to beat puppies with kittens! I bet!

134 posted on 07/30/2010 2:21:12 PM PDT by Aurorales (I will not be ridiculed into silence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Aurorales

you catch on, quickly!


135 posted on 07/30/2010 2:34:51 PM PDT by sappy (criminallibs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Pal, you’re fantasizing about Mel’s reasons for doing what he did, plain and simple. You have NO evidence that he was biologically compelled to spread “his seed” and make more babies - it’s your imagination. (You seem to be enjoying your fantasies, too.) Certainly, if what he was looking for was more babies, he was foolish to pick a 39-year-old woman. She’s past her prime fecundity - she’s lucky their child wasn’t born with Down Syndrome at her age.

The Old Testament may be full of Sarahs and Hagars, but there isn’t any of that in the New Testament. Maybe “biology” makes men want to fornicate with as many women as possible, but that’s nowhere absolved in Christianity.

That Genghis Khan legacy is nothing to be proud of, either. Khan and his sons used rape and concubinage as a form of oppression of the peoples they conquered. The men of conquered nations were slaughtered, and their women raped. It had nothing to do with some need for virility, and everything to do with subjugation and destruction. It certainly makes a lousy explanation for Gibson’s behavior.

http://books.google.com/books?id=XBv-nm6m9agC&pg=PA473&lpg=PA473&dq=genghis+khan+heredity&source=bl&ots=MPtLgv62Ep&sig=Mww8vSi-QUKYI36IhcG12uJc9y8&hl=en&ei=CHdTTOCeOoH98AbDxIXDBA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CCAQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false


136 posted on 07/30/2010 6:25:57 PM PDT by worst-case scenario (Striving to reach the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Oooo the "great" DiCaprio takes a stand.

Wonder what skeletons are in this empty skull actor's closet. Being a dude + looking pretty + speaking someone else's words is no way to go through life... but Leo has mastered it.

137 posted on 10/22/2010 2:09:32 PM PDT by Trajan88 (www.bullittclub.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-137 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson