Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Wisdom of William Tecumseh Sherman and the War on Terror
Pontiac | 7/26/2010 | Pontiac

Posted on 07/26/2010 8:04:25 PM PDT by Pontiac

William Tecumseh Sherman is either a hated war criminal or a honored war hero in the United States in this article I do not debate this point but only draw upon his wisdom as it applies to war. In what follows I will apply this wisdom to our present long and destined to be longer war against the World Islamic Terrorist Organizations.

The wars in Iraq, Afghanistan have been the subject of a great deal of controversy in the last decade. The words “Bush’s war” and the questions of the Iraq war’s legality have been the subject of many a written word in our national press. This is however not the subject of this piece. Today I will expound upon the wisdom of these wars and wars yet to begin.

The war in Afghanistan is the result of an act of war perpetrated by Islamic extremist terrorist on our nation. This is an indisputable fact. The active participants in this act were from various Middle Eastern Muslim nations primarily Saudi Arabia but also Yemini and Egyptian. The stated grievances of these men were the United States support of Israel and the presence of US troops in Saudi Arabia.

There are other unstated but strong motives that these men had. These motives have been expressed by like minded supporters of these terrorist actions. These motives are the spread of Western culture to the Muslim countries. In the minds of the fundamentalist Muslim the worst of the West influences is on women. That a woman can show bare skin let alone her face in public is to the Arab Muslim unacceptable and an affront to Allah. To the Taliban (the ruling power in Afghanistan at the time of the September 11, 2001 attack on this country) television, music, make up, dancing, soccer, kite flying and much more were forbidden as un-Islamic Western practices. To these people everything Western was evil. Another fundamental tenet of Islam is that all the world must be brought under the control of Islam, by sword if necessary.

For these reasons the Islamic terrorist brought war to our country. Our support of Israel may have been the precipitating act in their minds for the attack but their desire to humble the preeminent non-Islamic country in the world was large in their minds.

I will not discuss the legality of the Iraq war more than to state that congress voted on and passed a resolution authorizing the war and had available to them all of the intelligence documents concerning weapons of mass destruction that was available to the Bush administration.

The need for the war is however in my opinion undeniable. Saddam Hussein was a financial supporter of world wide Islamic terror. He had used chemical weapons on his own citizens he at the very least was gathering material to produce a nuclear weapon. Although we did not find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq there is evidence that he moved the weapons and the factories to Syria during the period before the war when the Bush administration was trying to negotiate Saddam’s peaceful surrender.

The point I wish to make about the Iraq war is that although direct ties between Al Qaida and Iraq are few Saddam had numerous ties with other terrorist organizations such as Hamas and the IRA. After the Iraq war a terrorist training camp was found there that had a Boeing 727 fuselage used for training terrorist hi-jackers.

Political correctness and multiculturalism has been much used in the arguments against these wars; either explicitly or in couched phrases; the failure of the government or the press to use the word terrorist or to openly name the people we are fighting as Muslim or Islamist is simply foolish political correctness. The first rule in war is to know your enemy. If you can not name your enemy, if you can not allow yourself to express anger and hatred at your enemy you will not defeat that enemy.

The press has spent a great deal of ink saying how the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan has harmed the reputation of the US and made us a pariah in international affairs. William Tecumseh Sherman arguably the most effective Union General of the Civil War had this to say about war and popularity:

“If the people raise a great howl against my barbarity and cruelty, I will answer that war is war and not popularity seeking.”

The United States is at war with people who choose to be at war with us and drew first blood. We do not have a choice of whether to go to war or not. This war is also not only a war of Islam against the United State. Islam is at war around the world. It is at war in Indonesia, the Philippines Islands, several African Countries, Europe, and even the Middle East itself. These Islamist are not simply trying to convert the world to Islam by the sword they also seek to purify Islam were it already exist. This is literally a world war. We are at war and we do not have the luxury of being kind and gentile with those who wish to kill us. I again turn to the wisdom of William Tecumseh Sherman:

“War is cruelty. There is no use trying to reform it. The crueler it is, the sooner it will be over. I would make this war as severe as possible, and show no symptoms of tiring till the South begs for mercy.”

The United States has made more effort than any nation at war ever has to limit the number of civilian casualties and yet the international press continues to excoriate the US for the incredibly few civilian dead in these wars. William Tecumseh Sherman had this to say:

“Every attempt to make war easy and safe will result in humiliation and disaster.”

We now have the technology to minimize civilian casualties but they can not be eliminated and we can not allow fear of civilian casualties to prevent us from pursuing the enemy where ever he may hide. Our enemy knows of our reluctance to harm civilians and uses this against us. He has used civilian villages a refuge and taken up human shields as a tactic of defense. This is a war crime and we must not permit it to deter us. To do so will encourage its continued use and lead to further civilian deaths or our ultimate defeat because we become unwilling to kill the enemy. We must adopt William Tecumseh Sherman’s stated goal:

“My aim, then, was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. Fear is the beginning of wisdom.”

We can not fight a war with half measures. It will only prolong the war and multiply the casualties. This should be the lesson of the Viet Nam war. A limited war is an endless war and can not be won.

I will end by again quoting the wisdom of William Tecumseh Sherman:

“War is the remedy that our enemies have chosen, and I say let us give them all they want.”


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; History; Military/Veterans; Society
KEYWORDS: afgahanistan; iraq; islam; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-230 next last
To: central_va
Is that what the socialists teach the little Yankee eggheads up there? Oh, brother...

Yeah we're not that big on lost cause fantasy up here. We stick with the truth.

121 posted on 07/27/2010 5:13:20 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: central_va
If one chooses dogsh!t as his subject, it isn’t surprising then that the result stinks to high heaven....

Especially when the Lost Cause manure spreaders show up.

122 posted on 07/27/2010 5:14:32 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
"Yeah we're not that big on lost cause fantasy up here. We stick with the truth.

Yeah we are really impressed with the number of conservatives in the north. Hell I can't even think of one.... including you.

123 posted on 07/27/2010 5:16:14 PM PDT by catfish1957 (Hey algore...You'll have to pry the steering wheel of my 317 HP V8 truck from my cold dead hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac
As far as I'm concerned Afghan is another Viet Nam. If we pull out now it will be seen as a defeat and the terrosits will recruit and act on that basis. If we keep fighting the way we are with the rules of engagement we have we will pull out in a couple of years and the terrorists will claim victory.

The best option is to wage all out war, win and wipe out as many terrosits and their supporters as we can. In Paki and Afghan. This is the option not currently being pursued.

124 posted on 07/27/2010 5:18:16 PM PDT by whence911 (Here illegally? Go home. Get in line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nosterrex
Sherman could not defeat the Confederate Army, so he decided to declare war on the civilians.

Tell that to the Army of Tennessee, Joe Johnston, and John Hood whose asses he kicked all the way from Chattanooga to Atlanta and then out again.

On the other hand, Lee refused to harm civilians.

Depends. Does rounding up free blacks and sending them south into slavery during his campaigns of 1862 and 1863 count as 'harming civilians'? Does all the property his army foraged during his campaigns and didn't pay for count as 'harming civilians'? Does burning Chambersburg count as 'harming civilians'?

125 posted on 07/27/2010 5:18:30 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: mstar
Unfortunately Sherman's "bumblers'"...

Bummers.

126 posted on 07/27/2010 5:19:42 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: mstar
Well, Non-Seq, you aim real carefully.

Real, real carefully.

127 posted on 07/27/2010 5:20:29 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957
While Lee paid for shoes he took from Gettysburg, Sherman....

Lee didn't get any shoes in Gettysburg, the Army of the Potomac had him otherwise occupied. But don't the the truth get in the way of a good Lost Cause fantasy.

128 posted on 07/27/2010 5:22:01 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957
Yeah we are really impressed with the number of conservatives in the north. Hell I can't even think of one.... including you.

The definition of a Southern conservative is a Democrat who switched parties once he realized he could do so and keep his big government, big spending ways.

129 posted on 07/27/2010 5:23:22 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Unfortunately Sherman's "bumblers'"... Bummers.

I like "bumblers" better, it just kinda fits.
130 posted on 07/27/2010 5:24:03 PM PDT by mstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957
Guess these northerners wonder why we are called Southern Gentlemen.

I always thought it was an oxymoron.

131 posted on 07/27/2010 5:24:57 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Why don’t you compare the behaviors of the Army of Northern Virgina’s 1863 invasion of PA to the Army of the Tennessee invasion of GA in 1864. No, I won’t do your f-ing research for you.

You mean when Lee's army stole everything that wasn't nailed down, abducted free blacks, looted houses, and burned iron works? That 1863 campaign?

132 posted on 07/27/2010 5:26:32 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: mstar
I like "bumblers" better, it just kinda fits.

Why go with fact when you can make things up as you go along?

133 posted on 07/27/2010 5:28:05 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
The definition of a Southern conservative is a Democrat who switched parties once he realized he could do so and keep his big government, big spending ways.

Might want to open up your copy of "Memoirs" and check out Sherman and Lincoln's ideas on big government. No, I don't have my "Kindle" up so I can point it out for you.
134 posted on 07/27/2010 5:31:35 PM PDT by mstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: mstar
No, I don't have my "Kindle" up so I can point it out for you.

Of course not.

135 posted on 07/27/2010 5:33:07 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Why go with fact when you can make things up as you go along?

Excuse me, did you just call me a liar?
136 posted on 07/27/2010 5:33:54 PM PDT by mstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
No, I don't have my "Kindle" up so I can point it out for you. Of course not.

Are you calling me a liar about my "Kindle"?
137 posted on 07/27/2010 5:35:52 PM PDT by mstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

You need to go chill, Buddy, you have crossed the line. The Civil War is over and not worth this.


138 posted on 07/27/2010 5:38:23 PM PDT by mstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: mstar
Are you calling me a liar about my "Kindle"?

No, I have no doubt that you have a Kindle.

139 posted on 07/27/2010 5:39:58 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Nosterrex
"I do not know anything about Sherman’s religious beliefs, but I would be interested to know his ethics of warfare."

You may find his correspondence with CSA General Hood quite edifying. As Sherman prepared to move on Atlanta, he offered to assist in the evacuation of civilians. Hood would not cooperate. Sherman warned Hood against emplacing fighting positions and artillery pieces amongst civilian targets. Hood ignored him. It's all pretty much right here in their own words.

140 posted on 07/27/2010 5:43:41 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-230 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson