Posted on 07/15/2010 9:54:16 AM PDT by My Favorite Headache
Bristol Palin and Levi Johnston shocked the world when they announced they were engaged again. The on-again, off-again couple seemed happy despite Sarah Palin's obvious disapproval of their reunion. It's no surprise considering her future son-in-law has betrayed and bad-mouthed the Palin clan on numerous occasions. According to a Palin insider, Sarah has already threatened him if he ever messes with her family again.
"Levi did everything he could to destroy Sarah and her family. He has accused Sarah of being a bad mother, a bad wife and a bad leader. How can he walk back into their life like nothing happened? He should think again," a Palin insider tells me. "He may have won Bristol back, but he will never gain the trust of Sarah. She doesn't forgive and forget."
Sources tell me that the 2008 Republican vice-presidential nominee is furious about her daughter's decision and thinks Bristol is making the biggest mistake of her life -- despite the fact that she and Todd eloped in 1988 without telling their parents. Levi Johnston and Bristol Palin
But it was ultimately Sarah who played grandma and comforted Bristol during her toughest times, while Johnston soaked up his fifteen minutes of fame by posing for Playgirl and hanging out with comedienne Kathy Griffin.
But it all comes back to politics. A Republican insider tells me Sarah is worried that her loose-lipped son-in-law will continue to ruin her political career and the public's perception of the Palin family.
"You can't control who your kids fall in love with, but Sarah wants this kid to go away. However, that doesn't look like it going to happen," the insider admits.
"So for the time being, Sarah is doing everything she can to protect her daughter and herself. And trust me, Levi has been warned. This isn't the sort of family you want to mess with twice."
Check the facts and put aside your feelings.
The manger seems to have acquired its dog.
Dang, I was worried about Sarah, but you're right. The first sign that Bristol has wised up and is looking for a way out, he'll have a tape out there.
I wouldn’t forgive the kid either. At least not until he has spent years, many years, demonstrating that he merits forgiveness.
Could care less when her first child was born.
You’re the type who would have turned away Joseph and Mary with the words, “there’s no room at the inn.”
One of your problems with Sarah seems to be that you think she’s phony. On what do you base that opinion?
Bristol’s take on the matter.....
Bristol blames their high-profile lives for the fall out. Had it not been for the fame and money in their lives, Bristol says, she and Levi would have been a happily married couple, leading a simple life.
“I think Levi and I would be married,” she told PEOPLE. “He would still have his [oil] job on the North Slope, and we’d be in a one-bedroom apartment, scraping by.”
The little twerp’s Andy Warhol moment has ended and now he is looking for his “Sugar Momma” now that Bristol has started making some cash.
Forgiveness is a good thing but not in this case. Levi has shown himself for who he really is and has been found totally lacking.
The Palins were married Aug 29, 1988, Track was born April 20, 1989. Unless severely premature, Sarah Palin was 7 weeks pregnant when they married.
That’s why they eloped!
The Palins were married Aug 29, 1988, Track was born April 20, 1989. Unless severely premature, Sarah Palin was 7 weeks pregnant when they married.
That’s why they eloped!
You can’t count.
I think the “Palin Insider” is their new neighbor.
If the kid is serious about not wanting to be a douchebag anymore, gets his life straightened out, marries Bristol and builds a life and career, I bet Sarah will eventually be just fine with that. And if he ever goes douchebag again...well, that disappearance can be arranged.
Let me give you a basic biology lesson. Let’s say Sarah married on Aug 29 (she did BTW). Her last period was approximately two weeks prior to her wedding date on August 15th. To determine her due date we would consult this formula called the Naegele formula.
Last Menstrual Periord + 7 days - 3 months) = Due Date
Using Sarah’s info ((August 15, 1988 + 7 days) - 3 months) = May 21, 1989. Track was born April 20th or at 36 weeks gestation. 36 weeks is considered full term.
Now, get your mind out of the gutter.
"You’re the type who would have turned away Joseph and Mary with the words, “there’s no room at the inn.” "
There was no room at the inn. It was before a major Jewish holiday. You may not know this but it was prophecy that He would have a lowly birth and be rejected by Jews.
If I lived then, my Jewish teachings would discourage getting pregnant before marraige. In those days there was shame and restraint. When it did happen, people tried to marry quickly and not call attention to it. But, with people like you around, you'll CHEER on single moms. For you there is no shame.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies Sarah Palin Wants Levi Johnston To Disappear Thursday, July 15, 2010 10:42:18 AM · 120 of 130 colorcountry to nmh
"gliddy gloop gloopy...."
Yes, more impressive commentary from colorcountry.
It’s all about $$$. Levi sees that Bristol is being paid a tidy sum to speak and he is never one to walk away from a business opp. Sad for the girl and her child.When Bristol is no longer in demand,Levi will slink away. Have seen it happen too many times before.Bristol has so much growing up to do. Thankfully she will have the emotional support of her family. She will need it when he leaves again ,with new fodder for the tabloids.
Maybe it is time for Todd to take Levi out on a hunting trip...
>>>Buy the kids a house two hours away by plane.
I predict something like this will actually happen; since Bristol has chosen her babydaddy over common sense, the Palins will end up shutting out Bristol.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.