Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: citizenredstater9271
Talk about going from bad to worse.
2 posted on
07/12/2010 3:53:37 PM PDT by
iowamark
To: citizenredstater9271
The supporter has bad judgment, not once, but twice.
3 posted on
07/12/2010 3:53:55 PM PDT by
Ingtar
(If he could have taxed it, Obama's hole would have been plugged by now.)
To: citizenredstater9271
Awwww, geez, not this...

4 posted on
07/12/2010 3:54:03 PM PDT by
jessduntno
(Leftists don't hate guns, they love them. When they control them. 120,000,000 dead so far!)
To: citizenredstater9271
Let’s say “I’ve been an idiot, I guess I’d better double down”.
5 posted on
07/12/2010 3:55:00 PM PDT by
Stentor
To: citizenredstater9271
Ron Paul is a complete nutjob. Mitt Romney is a statist.
No thanks on both.
6 posted on
07/12/2010 3:57:13 PM PDT by
big'ol_freeper
("Anyone pushing Romney must love socialism...Piss on Romney and his enablers!!" ~ Jim Robinson)
To: citizenredstater9271
I say both the candidates are nuts. the difference is wRONg PAUL is certifiably nuts. Any other questions?
8 posted on
07/12/2010 4:01:00 PM PDT by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: citizenredstater9271
LOL, this is politically like going from Scientology to Westboro Baptist.
10 posted on
07/12/2010 4:02:47 PM PDT by
mnehring
To: citizenredstater9271
Unfortunately Ron Paul did not perform well in the 2008 debates, or he might have started a last-minute stampeed. McPain outperformed him in debate.
11 posted on
07/12/2010 4:05:04 PM PDT by
Theodore R.
(Rush was right when he said America can survive Obama but not the Obama supporters.)
To: citizenredstater9271
NH appears to be swinging toward RP.
.
13 posted on
07/12/2010 4:06:30 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
To: citizenredstater9271
just couldn’t stand the fast pace high tension of the Romney campaign, eh?
15 posted on
07/12/2010 4:11:36 PM PDT by
bigbob
To: citizenredstater9271
Ron Paul probably does. Unfortunately, he’s mad.
17 posted on
07/12/2010 4:13:16 PM PDT by
Vanders9
To: citizenredstater9271; 50mm; darkwing104
Paulbot alert. Kitties on standby???
18 posted on
07/12/2010 4:13:49 PM PDT by
GQuagmire
( We are no longer Massholes)
To: citizenredstater9271
The Ron Paul who agrees with Barney Frank that defense spending should be cut while we’re fighting terrorists? Can’t say that I think much of the former Romney supporter’s common sense.
19 posted on
07/12/2010 4:14:46 PM PDT by
skr
(May God confound the enemy)
To: citizenredstater9271
20 posted on
07/12/2010 4:15:16 PM PDT by
mnehring
To: citizenredstater9271
from the nut bag to the nut.
22 posted on
07/12/2010 4:18:12 PM PDT by
mad_as_he$$
(Playing by the rules only works if both sides do it!)
To: citizenredstater9271
The only Purpose of Paultards is to get Democrats Elected (When was the last time you seen him criticize a rat?)...And they the only care about the Constitution long enough to use it to roll their next doobie...
Paul like most other pols is addicted to earmarks...What do you have to say about that?

26 posted on
07/12/2010 4:24:08 PM PDT by
darkwing104
(Lets get dangerous)
To: citizenredstater9271
30 posted on
07/12/2010 4:31:34 PM PDT by
50mm
(Beidh do fanachta a gairid!)
To: citizenredstater9271
What say other Freepers? If you haven't figured it out yet, we don't do "cult of personality". When you fall into the cult of personality you surrender your Liberty to a false image. QED..Obama

35 posted on
07/12/2010 4:43:08 PM PDT by
darkwing104
(Lets get dangerous)
To: citizenredstater9271
It’s sad that conservatism has sunk to the point that it’s not recognizable.
Ron Paul’s views are right down the line conservative...or what conservative *was*...before people began twisting it into “big government is fine, as long as it forces people to do what *I* want” and “cut spending except for things like making other countries take some responsibility for their own defense.” Of course, a “new-fangled conservative” is an oxymoron. A better term is “Lib.”
Admittedly, Ron Paul is not isolationist enough to be a true conservative in the classic American sense (not to be confused with a classical conservative!) But he’s non-interventionist, at least.
40 posted on
07/12/2010 5:01:46 PM PDT by
Gondring
(Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
To: citizenredstater9271
I say that in political terms, he’s gone from death by hanging to death by firing squad.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson