And you, of course, are able to judge everyone's thinking ability. I am "deeply irrational." I can assure you that you didn't get a higher score than I did on that SAT test for "analytical reasoning" we all used to take. You think you know what I, or we, all want; and so it must be so.
But really, you don't have a clue. I just want a legal resolution to the issue. I have written to the one Supreme Court Justice whose homes I have visited on a number of occasions, that I thought they should take a case and rule that since Obama had at least one parent who was a US citizen that he was a natural born citizen under the meaning of the Constitution.
It's not about Obama. It's about the rule of law in this country.
ML/NJ
SAT scores? That's an odd thing to bring up. Also irrelevant. If you've paid attention in your life, you know that otherwise very intelligent people can also be deeply irrational on certain subjects. We are not machines, and an ill-considered emotional investment can get the better of any of us. “There but for the grace of God...”
I am curious about two things. If you think the Supreme Court should take a case and “rule that since Obama had at least one parent who was a US citizen that he was a natural born citizen under the meaning of the Constitution”, why do you refer to a usurper and bring up the two-citizen parent argument yourself as “evidence?” And if it is about the rule of law, why would you question Judge Land's perfectly appropriate use of sanctions for attorney conduct as an attempt to silence or intimidate? The rule of law certainly applies to misbehaving attorneys.