The problem is that you are convinced Obama is a usurper without any actual evidence to back that assertion up. You have urban legends, innuendo, and a bunch of wild “what ifs”. For very good reasons having to do with protecting individual freedom and liberty, courts don’t authorize fishing expeditions on that kind of stuff even if you had standing. You will never get any Court properly functioning under the Constitution to authorize discovery against anyone just because you think they might have done something wrong. You need credible evidence and a cogent argument that ties it all together. One of the big problems with Orly is that she simply rants about a bunch of noncredible evidence amid hyperbolic accusations without ever bothering to get down to meaningful citations of case law that would constitute a legal argument. And she can’t even be bothered to follow basic rules of submittal. Put simply, her briefs are gibberish to a court, and her behavior is outlandish..
Actually there is some evidence. Obama himself claims his father is a man who was never a citizen of the United States. He supposedly wrote a book about this.
ML/NJ
You sure are an interesting "Old Conservative." I've been doing a little research. In all of the posts that show up today for you on the first page of your recent posts (I think it's 100 posts but I'm not sure.) only TWO (2 !!) weren't in some way related to the eligibility issue and those two had to do with Joran van der Sloot!
Joran van der Sloot! There's an issue high on the list of Freedom Loving FReepers! Nothing from you about Obama, about Pelosi, about the economy, about Rush, the McDonald Gun decision, or the oil spill. Just the birth certificate! And what do you say? That none of us has a right to ask! I think maybe you should take your act someplace else.
ML/NJ