Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Looks like the iPhone rumors are true...apple has launched a dud.
1 posted on 06/29/2010 8:07:05 PM PDT by for-q-clinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: Swordmaker; driftdiver; PugetSoundSoldier; ShadowAce

Tech ping please


2 posted on 06/29/2010 8:07:56 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: for-q-clinton

Sounds like Obama needs to appoint an iPhone4 czar.


3 posted on 06/29/2010 8:10:18 PM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: for-q-clinton

!!!!!!!! / sarc


4 posted on 06/29/2010 8:13:07 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: for-q-clinton

Eff Apple. I get so sick of Rush marvelling over Apple this and that. I loathe MSFT and Google. I give credit to Jobs for blocking porn but this Apple infatuation is a joke. Jobs has done an amazing job but idiots worship Apple like they worship Star Trek.


7 posted on 06/29/2010 8:13:46 PM PDT by Frantzie (Democrats = Party of I*lam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: for-q-clinton

Just because the customer service people are giving a line out about the iphone 4 doesn’t mean it’s not a fantastic phone. I love it and have not noticed ANY difference in coverage or calling or reception from my previous iPhone.

Remember too that in these first weeks, you can return your iPhone for a full refund if you are not happy. A class action lawsuit is just stupid at this point (well, not for the attorneys).


8 posted on 06/29/2010 8:13:54 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: for-q-clinton

HATER!! HATER!! HATER!! ;-)


9 posted on 06/29/2010 8:14:54 PM PDT by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: for-q-clinton

It’s not the way the phone works, it’s the perception of how the phone works that matters. It’s more of the function follows form. Make it shiny and pretty and slick, and you can overlook the fact it has problems doing the basic functions of a phone.

I’ve read a few posts on tech forums that said the problem is the transmit functionality of the phone, not necessarily the receive. So the upcoming software patch that Jobs hinted at will be to crank the transmit power up to compensate. Of course, that will kill battery life, but they’ll figure out a way to PR-cover that as well, if it is the case.


10 posted on 06/29/2010 8:23:45 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: for-q-clinton

Suckers. I never want to be the first one to own anything. You pay too much, and all that extra money goes to the R&D to fix all the problems. Big waste. But hey, vanity comes at a price.


12 posted on 06/29/2010 8:26:49 PM PDT by Huck (Q: How can you tell a party is in the minority? A: They're complaining about the deficit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: for-q-clinton

I don’t get it. If they don’t work, just get your money back, and go buy a competing product that does work.


13 posted on 06/29/2010 8:30:13 PM PDT by catnipman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: for-q-clinton

I might get one after Verizon has them (in January), and most of the kinks are worked out. Then again, Android will have further evolved by that point also.

Then again, I don’t really *need* either of them. ;-) My 4-year-old non-touchscreen decidedly uncool cell phone still makes phone calls quite well, thank you. And that’s all I really need it for.


16 posted on 06/29/2010 8:35:46 PM PDT by RepublitarianRoger2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: for-q-clinton

From what I’ve read earlier, Nokia abandoned an external body-antenna fusion format precisely for these reasons. Apple didn’t want to purchase patents that Nokia had, for antenna designs, and decided to hoe their own “road”, so to speak, with obviously disastrous *performance* results. Sales however, isn’t going to be affected by much.

http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/26/iphone-4-antenna-problems-were-predicted-on-june-10-by-danish-pr/


17 posted on 06/29/2010 8:38:36 PM PDT by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: for-q-clinton

EXCERPT:

Well, this must be one of the most epic “I told you so” moments in the history of consumer electronics. Professor Gert Frølund Pedersen, an antenna expert over at Denmark’s Aalborg University, managed to get his concerns about the iPhone 4’s external antennae on the record a cool two weeks before the phone was even released. In an interview on June 10, the Danish brainbox explained that he wasn’t impressed by Steve Jobs’ promises of better reception, describing external antennas as “old news,” and suggested that contact with fleshlings could result in undesirable consequences to the handset’s reception:

“The human tissue will in any event have an inhibitory effect on the antenna. Touch means that a larger portion of antenna energy becomes heat and lost.”

Machine-translated that may be, but you get the point. Researchers at Gert’s university have already shown that over 90 percent of any phone’s antenna signal can be stifled by holding it in the right place, but he’s highlighting the specific exposure to skin contact as a separate issue to be mindful of. Good to know we’ve got sharp minds out there, and as to his suggested solution, Gert says phones should ideally have two antennae that act in a sort of redundant array, so that when one is blocked, the other can pick up the slack. So, what are we going to do now, Apple?


19 posted on 06/29/2010 8:42:46 PM PDT by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: for-q-clinton
What's funny is that if you put the iPhone 4 into ANY protective case, the problem goes away. Sounds like an issue with the human body's electrical charge transmitted through the skin of your hands interfering with the reception of the iPhone.
21 posted on 06/29/2010 8:57:58 PM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: for-q-clinton
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FL7yD-0pqZg

I LOVE THIS CARTOON!

22 posted on 06/29/2010 8:58:36 PM PDT by Solson (magnae clunes mihi placent, nec possum de hac re mentiri.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: for-q-clinton
Apple is a victim of their own hype, where demand from the Apple faithfuls outstripped their beta testing and quality process. The execs are totally consumed with expanding market share while the iPhone fad is hot, by shipping the new product as fast as possible to fulfill the backlog from a fawning fan base.

This is a HUGE mistake! Apple has worked hard to develop a "buying experience" - beyond just delivering a gadget to a consumer - to promote loyalty and exclusivity. Now those efforts over a long period of time, are badly tainted by lying to fanboys who are early adopters, trend setters, and sentiment / opinion leaders.

This sounds very familiar - like Toyota who aggressively pursued market share at the expense of safety. They ignored the feedback from customers on sudden acceleration problems. (No, it must be your fault silly customer - we are Toyota. Maybe you have Restless Leg syndrome). Ha, what impeccable timing! There's a Toyota safety commercial in my face right now - boasting they're now spending $1 million every HOUR on safety - probably BS - but that's a big number if they're anywhere near that amount. And BP with all their touchy-feely commercials on how progressive they are with alternative fuels (and they're Cap and Tax supporters). But the problem was that they had the worst record on safety of any oil company operating in the US.

So, it's all about what you DO, not what you say.

23 posted on 06/29/2010 9:01:23 PM PDT by uncommonsense (Conservatives believe what they see; Liberals see what they believe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: for-q-clinton
One hand over your ear. One hand holds the phone.


25 posted on 06/29/2010 9:05:14 PM PDT by DeFault User
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: for-q-clinton

They just expected people to live with it because “they’re Apple.”


26 posted on 06/29/2010 9:11:58 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: for-q-clinton
Looks like the iPhone rumors are true...apple has launched a dud.

I picked up an iPhone 4 for my mom today to replace her 1st gen iPhone. AT&T was giving away vouchers for cases (up to $29.99), so i picked up a case too. I just came from her house after setting it up - reception is fine when it's in the case. It obviously has a non-trivial design flaw and Jobs isn't going to bluff his way out of it, but overall it's a nice phone and my mom is happy with it.

I'll stick with my unlocked Nexus One, however. It's manufacturer doesn't presume to tell me how I can use it.
27 posted on 06/29/2010 9:12:15 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: for-q-clinton

Just got it... nothing wrong with it... you’d have to pry My Precious from my cold dead fingers.


29 posted on 06/29/2010 10:33:58 PM PDT by Chet 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: for-q-clinton
Looks like the iPhone rumors are true...apple has launched a dud.

I got my iPhone4 this morning... and cannot duplicate the problem... and the reception is better than the reception I have been getting on my iPhone 3Gs. In an area by my computer, where three cell towers have consistently been fighting for the signal, over SIX phones, three iPhones, LG, and two Motorolas, all of which have show everything from zero to five bars, the iPhone 4 has consistently this evening show FIVE BARS... no matter WHERE I've held it, on the lines, across the lines, wet hands, dry hands, leather, no leather. I've TRIEAD to get it to lose signal and can't... just like most other iPhone 4 owners.

In addition, my reception on my Plantronics 835 Bluetooth earpiece is FAR BETTER, clearer, and louder than what i was receiving from my iPhone 3Gs. I had planned on replacing it with a JawBone and handing the Plantronics off to my daughter along with the 3Gs... but I'll keep it.

Your assertion, based on the complaints of a few of the 1.7 million purchasers of the iPhone, is baseless. In my opinion it's FUD.

32 posted on 06/30/2010 12:36:00 AM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson