You're right. Why should I want to trust a Republican-run state government or a non-partisan fact-checking website (because obviously they're part of an insidious and widespread conspiracy to cover up the secret truth) when I obviously should want to pin my trust on such people as:
- a convicted forger who spent three years in prison;
- a fake 'expert' who spent a year pretending to have expertise and credentials that he didn't possess, and who's also faked evidence;
- incompetent attorneys who've repeatedly been suckered by fake 'evidence' that they didn't make the slightest effort to authenticate; and
- anonymous online armchair attorneys schooled at the University of Google with legal theories that they can't get a single legal scholar to agree with.
Similarly, I'm beginning to suspect that NASA is lying about the moon landing; I've seen some very persuasive videos on YouTube by some guy, and I haven't seen any official statements by NASA rebutting some of his claims. And there's apparently a big conspiracy to cover up the fact that you don't have to pay income taxes; I always thought I did, but apparently I've been putting my trust in the wrong people.
I can just see you hunched over the key board having just hit the ‘enter’ key for your post, which you did with a slight flourish. You straightened up, pushed away from the desk and, as the chair was rolling back, you stuck both arms up in the air with fists clenched. “OMG I’m so clever - take that you birther loser!” But it was sad, too, because there was no one there to appreciate all that you do for your master.
Exactly, which part of “NO personal attacks” did you NOT understand?
Do you really want to go, there, Loren? I have stayed away from it because you do not deserve any attention whatsoever.
But, if you really want to go there, without making a personal attack, I will say that everything you and your boyfriend have said about me is enough garbage to fill the Grand Canyon 100 times over.
You made yourself into a folk hero among the Left, claiming that you “outed” me when you did no such thing.
Once my legal name was on the Internet, any idiot could have Googled it and found several million hits because I HAVE 40 years of credentials, and I HAVE the credentials to back up everything I've said and done.
Did you, or your boyfriend, or your lib friends know that the word, “IMAGE” is nowhere to be found in Neil Krawetz’s credentials. Krawetz is NOT an image analysis expert, not by any stretch of the imagination. He is a computer security expert.
All he knows how to do is run software. He reeadily admits that he cannot spot forgeries with his naked eyes and admires those who can. Everything that he has done with the COLBs, I have also done and 100 other things that he cannot do.
Krawetz KNOWS the COLB image is bogus but he has deliberately hidden the evidence that proves it. But because he's a Socialist liberal, he sides with Obama and you guys.
Yes, you read that right. Krawetz believes in spreading around the wealth and why it would be a good thing for everyone to be poor.
Krawetz also said that a person learns a skill to apply to a job - he does not learn a skill while he is on the job.
That’s why he discounted everywhere I put down in my affidavit that I have worked with computers, scanners, and printers for over 30 years. Krawetz thinks that what he learned about scans and printouts from a book or in class for 30 minutes a day is superior to actually making scans and printouts for 30 years.
As it turns out, I'm the only one who practices what HE preaches.
But, you merely parroted everything he said, without question, because he has a PhD in Computer Science, as if that qualifies him to do anything and everything with computers.
It is you who are completely incapable of reading and interpreting my credentials, just as you do not even know what you write on your own blog!
Speaking of that blog, you turned it over to my Internet psychostalker: an insanely jealous, pathological liar who ran his mouth off about me on your blog exactly like he did on his own blog, and just like he did on every single blog and forum he joined for the sole purpose of trashing me.
This guy is a BIRTHER and he coined the expression, “funky border” claiming it as proof the COLB is a forgery.
But, he became anti-Polarik, and it did not matter on which side of the issue I was on - he would still be trashing me.
He has ZERO credentials, ZERO college degrees, ZERO training in graphics, and ZERO accomplishments of any kind in his life.
But, given you know less about graphics than he does, you teamed up with him.
Google his name and you'll be lucky to get more than two hits - both of which is to your blog.
When he is not in his own fantasy world, he makes stereo wires for a living.
Everything he said, and you said, is totally and categorically false. I have never lied about my credentials and never faked anything.
Now, I did intentionally jerk around the libtards who were so intent on literally interpreting my online affidavits by switching the degree title's around, but the affidavits I signed and submitted to Berg, Taitz, Keyes, Hochberg, etc., had my actual credentials and experiences.
I CAN spot forgeries with my naked eyes and I CAN and HAVE corroborated those observations over two years and 1,500 hours of painstaking research.
But, like true scientists, when new data becomes available, you modify your theories to fit.
You and your boyfriend are still stuck in the Summer of 2008 when nobody had ever seen a real 2007 COLB.
The fact that you are incapable of going onto the Florida State University website and actually reading the descriptions of the focus areas of my degrees, is not my fault.
Nor is it my fault that you do not understand the difference between a degree major, a program major, and a program track.
But, clearly, you have no idea what “forensics” means, or “digital imaging,” or even know how to do true research (you copy very well, though).
I never said I was a “forensics” anything, even though the research I've done for two years IS exactly what forensics scientists do.
The word, “forensics” appears a total of three (3) times in my 260,000 word final report and they all refer to Factcheck, not me.
This is the same 260,000 word, 160 page, 210+ image final report that you never read and your boyfriend refused to read.
He said, and I quote, “I don't have time to read through all of this” so he goes back to July 2008 and totally twists what I said.
He spent several months spewing total garbage about me, but he “doesn't have the time” to read a research report that has been online since September 2008?
That is the epitome of BS.
He also is famous for going into my Photobucket account, which now has over 1,000 images, and - before I locked them down, he would pull them off, without knowing anything about them, and then make false claims.
For example, there is a copy of Michele's COLB that had the Seal penciled over. He accused me of doing that when, in reality, Michele did it.
By the way, there was another image of Michele's COLB that he displayed on YOUR blog which he describe, and I quote, “It looks exactly like the Kos image.”
I only have a few hundred Michele COLB images, but the one he pulled off and touting as being the same - which is a ludicrous statement - was one I modified. So, I'll take that as a compliment.
Bottom line is, Loren, you do not know diddly-squat about anything having to do with Obama’s birth certificate.
YOU QUOTE FACTCHECK CHAPTER AND VERSE.
That alone disqualifies you from this conversation.
If you’re willing to pin your trust on bureaucrats who have been documented engaging in criminal activity, there’s not much I can do to help you.