[DebraAI]

This is about a poll conducted on what American citizens would do if Obama somehow managed to get the UN Treaty that is being written now passed in the Senate. I wouldn't put it past them as no one thought they'd ram Health Care down our throats. Who knows what arm twisting they could pull off. I don't think Americans believe he can pull it off. I sure hope not but with all that is going on I am not totally optimistic that he will fail.

[a fool in paradise]

And how many dictators has the United Nations removed from power?

Oh wait, they are a PRO-dictator organization and anti-US. Get them out of here. Corrupt to the bone.

[unkus]

It could pass the Senate.

[muddler]

Every blade of grass.

[a fool in paradise]

This is about a poll conducted on what American citizens would do if Obama somehow managed to get the UN Treaty that is being written now passed in the Senate.

Pass it in the House and Senate, and then 'FIX' it like they did with Obamacare. Get the votes now before they lose their majorities...

[OldDeckHand]

Remember, it’s two thirds necessary for ratification, not the 60 they used for Obamacare. Unless something untoward happens to the entire Republican delegation, this will NEVER be ratified.

[Cheesel]

FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS....

[balls]

It’s quite evident that 0 can do whatever he pleases, despite all the Texas-style tough talk from opponents.

[Oldpuppymax]

I only know that Hussein’s gun collectors will have a very bad time when they come up my driveway.

[Cuchulain]

Not a Revolution. A Rebellion.

[Greg123456]

Koo Koo...Koo Koo...Koo Koo.
Who did they poll? The article and the web site seem even too kooky for me.

[marron]

I don’t even own a gun. But if they get this through, I’ll meet you guys at the mall in DC. We’ll make sure they hear us.

[Dayman]

No they won't. If gun confiscation occurs then 95% of gun owners will willingly turn over their guns for “compensation,” even if that's just an agreement to not be prosecuted and spending years in prison. The rest will hide their guns and think they're rebelling by not turning them in, but virtually nobody will strike back offensively.

People are too comfortable in their lives to have another revolution. Besides, the only way a revolution could be fought again is through the use of explosives. Those that do use explosives are derided by even 2nd amendment advocates. Revolution requires offensive strikes, not just hiding a gun in your attic insulation “just in case.”

[JSDude1]

President Obama’s ‘Woodrow Wilson’ moment? (AKA the Treaty of the ‘League of Nations’)?

[M Kehoe]

Welcome to FR.

I haven't heard of the source you quote. No matter, it would sure be great target practice on blue helmets, U.S. Sen...., etc..

5.56mm

[BuckeyeTexan]

Revolution? I’m in.

[twhitak]

Never owned a gun. Never wanted to. But if this passes, I may change my mind.

[RJL]

The first two battles of the American revolution, Lexington and Concord, were fought over guns. The British moved to consolidate power by confiscating guns and the Americans said no.

[TexasFreeper2009]

lol

a treaty can't override the constitution.

[Man50D]

The NRA just sold out to the socialists by agreeing not to oppose the unconstitutional Disclose Act on the pretense it will preserve the NRA's first Amendment rights STATEMENT FROM THE NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION ON H.R. 5175, THE DISCLOSE ACT while not realizing the socialists are working to destroy the 2nd Amendment through the U.N.!

[JPG]

You want my gun? Sure, no problem, c’mon over and get it.