Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Opinions Needed-Trying to advise a friend (Vanity)
6/14/10 | hoagy62

Posted on 06/14/2010 1:19:25 PM PDT by hoagy62

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last
To: mad_as_he$$

Repeat guys,,, he needs to at least speak to an Attorney. Statute of limitations can be like a marital prenup. There are some things that can stop it in some states.

And though he would likely win such an old case, (after great expense and heartache) the stakes are still sky high. Lets say for example,,, your DA is a guy like Mike Nifong. Lets say he/she starts an investigation,,,
The friend needs to clam up and at least talk to a lawyer in his state. It could be the best 200 bucks he ever spends.


61 posted on 06/14/2010 2:09:06 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
Probably, but they have to prove he “fled” with intent to avoid. Lawyer will most likely want to write a go away letter ...
62 posted on 06/14/2010 2:14:39 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Sometimes you have to go to dark places to get to the light....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

I agree, he should skip the reunion. Make up any excuse. Just unable to go. I would not hire a lawyer at this time. Maybe track down one or two so that if anything would come of this, he would have one to contact, but it seems pretty unlikely it will go anywhere. Good luck to your friend to get past this mess.


63 posted on 06/14/2010 2:29:08 PM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62
The sentence SHOULD have read “tried to get HER to touch his...”

I knew that. Just being a smart ass.

I cannot provide any advice but since you only asked for opinions...

I would not attend the reunion. No way. He should be prepared for some sort of a litigation...civil action rather than criminal given the circumstances. This may wind up being no more than an attempt to besmirch his name in court papers since no criminal action is possible at this late date. But anyone can file suit against anyone. This is a tactic unto itself and if he is not certain of this woman's resources, she may have the wherewithall to file a suit to simply make his life hell. Forwarned is fore-armed.

64 posted on 06/14/2010 2:29:10 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (You can only get smarter by engaging a smarter opponent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

And they “prove” it by taking a case to grand jury,, and indicting you. (Using his apology as proof he did “something”)

And im not talking civil, where a threatening lawyer letter might shut her up, im talking criminal. If this crazy woman believes it happened, and gets a feminazi-type or Nifong-type DA to listen to her,,,, he could be in over his head fast. Def worth a lawyer visit. He’s almost sure to avoid a conviction,, but how he acts now could decide if that is nearly free, or costs him 75,000 bucks.

Little things matter here for him.


65 posted on 06/14/2010 2:34:44 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

I’ll add my concurrence with the advice that your friend should speak with an attorney.

People have been known to hurl accusations of child molestation that are not true. My cousin was going through a nasty divorce. One day, he was pulled out of a client meeting by police officers. The wife, not happy with the proposed financial settlement, accused him of molesting their son. The charges were unfounded; she couldn’t prove them; so the case was dismissed.

My cousin,a practicing attorney, thought he could handle the divorce all by himself. He was wrong. Had he consulted with another attorney, things might have gone a lot better and he would not have had to face these unfounded charges. So yes, your friend should seek some counsel at least to find out what the law is and what his options are.


66 posted on 06/14/2010 2:35:20 PM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

“since no criminal action is possible at this late date”

I’ll say again,, it could be possible, depends on the state and the circumstances. It’s unlikely, but by no means impossible. More than a few people have been prosecuted LONG after the fact, repressed memories, etc.


67 posted on 06/14/2010 2:38:54 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

“had been a Christian for over 20 years” What would that have to do with anything?


68 posted on 06/14/2010 2:44:30 PM PDT by The Worthless Miracle (I will not gird my loins for Joe Biden.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Professional
WHy anyone in their right mind is involved with facebook or myspace, etc, is beyond me.

Bump!

69 posted on 06/14/2010 2:50:02 PM PDT by spectre (Spectre's wife )(Save the Brown Pelican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62
Your friend needs legal advice.Soon.
70 posted on 06/14/2010 3:06:50 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Host The Beer Summit-->Win The Nobel Peace Prize!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gundog
Statute of limitations would apply.

I've read that some states have changed their statute of limitations laws in cases like this.

71 posted on 06/14/2010 3:08:13 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Host The Beer Summit-->Win The Nobel Peace Prize!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HospiceNurse

“make me wish I was a liberal”

You probably never belonged on this site anyway, HUFF PO will enjoy your company, good riddance, noob.


72 posted on 06/14/2010 3:43:10 PM PDT by beefree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
I've read that some states have changed their statute of limitations laws in cases like this.

Yes, but probably only in the last 8-10 years, and they would not apply to cases prior to their passage. Prohibitions on ex post facto laws should apply.

73 posted on 06/15/2010 10:23:11 AM PDT by gundog (Outrage is anger taken by surprise. Nothing these people do surprises me anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

Some states have extened or eliminated the statute of limitations on child molestation. Also, civil and criminal limitations can vary. I would contact a lawyer and find out for sure before resting easy.


74 posted on 06/15/2010 10:27:40 AM PDT by whence911 (Here illegally? Go home. Get in line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson