To: nickcarraway
NSA has his originals. He's got copies and doesn't know it.
Amateurs shouldn't try encryption.
/johnny
To: nickcarraway
But is it as good and successful as the code talkers? Never broken.
3 posted on
06/12/2010 7:42:24 PM PDT by
ThomasThomas
(I wonder therefore I wander.)
To: nickcarraway
"I made the symbols up, designed them myself making sure they don't belong to any language in the world. It's a totally a new secret language," he said. Yeah, but it still stands for known languages.
But it would be almost impossible to decrypt any document encrypted using the Abu Dhabi cipher," Al Mazroui said.
"Almost" is not a real good word to use around cryptography.
4 posted on
06/12/2010 7:42:39 PM PDT by
Talisker
(When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
To: nickcarraway
"I made the symbols up, designed them myself making sure they don't belong to any language in the world. It's a totally a new secret language," he said.
An alphabet, no matter how weird looking, does not a language make.
5 posted on
06/12/2010 7:44:24 PM PDT by
aruanan
To: nickcarraway
This sounds like a relatively simple substitution cypher. They are pretty easy to break. Of course, the person who claims to have a cypher must show that it really is a code, and not just random noise. They have to show that a message can be sent and decoded from their code.
Anyone can send a set of garbage, demand that someone “break the code”, and claim that it is unbreakable when there is no message.
6 posted on
06/12/2010 7:44:27 PM PDT by
marktwain
To: nickcarraway
“Paging Bruce Schneier, will Mr. Bruce Schneier please come to the lobby.”
Seriously, I’d just about bet Bruce could easily take it down. Check a few of his cryptogram newsletters to see what he’s about.
To: ShadowAce
To: nickcarraway
This should take all of about a week or so.
12 posted on
06/12/2010 8:04:44 PM PDT by
Oceander
(The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
To: nickcarraway
13 posted on
06/12/2010 8:06:45 PM PDT by
rolling_stone
(no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
To: nickcarraway
17 posted on
06/12/2010 8:54:24 PM PDT by
Gapplega
To: nickcarraway
So what? The VIC cipher was never actually broken: the Soviet agent who used it defected and told us the algorithm and what he and his handlers were using for keys—straddling checkerboard to convert the letters to one or two digit numbers, followed by Vigenere-style encryption of the digits, followed by, if memory serves, a round of ordinary keyword columnar transposition and one of disrupted keyword columnar transposition, followed by reconversion to letters using the straddling checkerboard.
19 posted on
06/12/2010 9:24:09 PM PDT by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
To: nickcarraway
To: nickcarraway
22 posted on
06/13/2010 3:34:51 AM PDT by
JoeProBono
(A closed mouth gathers no feet)
To: nickcarraway
One of the most singular characteristics of the art of deciphering is the strong conviction possessed by every person, even moderately acquainted with it, that he is able to construct a cipher which nobody else can decipher. I have also observed that the cleverer the person, the more intimate is his conviction. In my earliest study of the subject I shared in this belief, and maintained it for many years. -- Charles Babbage
23 posted on
06/14/2010 9:24:58 AM PDT by
jdege
To: nickcarraway
Is-thay ead-thray is-hay oing-gay oo-tay e-bay un-fay!
24 posted on
06/14/2010 9:27:41 AM PDT by
MortMan
(If quizzes are quizzicle, what are tests?)
To: nickcarraway
“TO SERVE MAN.....IT’S A COOKBOOK!!!”
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson