Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING NEWS!!! JUSTICE HAS BEEN DENIED!!!!!
www.safeguardourconstitution.com ^ | 06/02/2010 | www.safeguardourconstitution.com

Posted on 06/03/2010 7:02:50 AM PDT by jy22077

LTC Terry Lakin IS NOT RECEIVING A FAIR TRIAL!!!! Lakin has been DENIED JUSTICE, DUE PROCESS and a FAIR TRIAL http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com/ Lakin needs all the support we can muster.

Everyone needs to email this piece of work and tell him that Lakin has a right to JUSTICE and a FAIR TRIAL. Email away everyone: Daniel J. Dricoll LTC, JA Investigating Officer daniel.driscoll@amedd.army.mil ......http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com/images/stories/documents/io_ruling_on_def_request_for_witnessesevid-usvlakin.pdf Let's make sure this email goes viral! www.safeguardourconstitution.com


TOPICS: Education; Military/Veterans; Reference; Society
KEYWORDS: allaquiver; birthcertificate; breathless; certifigate; exclamatoryabuse; frantic; gaypunct; greatgooglymoogly; hysteria; naturalborncitizen; romney; romney4obama; romneybots4obama; romneybotsvsbirthers; terrylakin; tizzy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 261-276 next last
To: Drew68
and your son can never be president regardless of how much you spout that he is eligible. Sorry, he is not a natural born citizen. Oh and by the way, enjoying posting over at politijab with your pals parsy and milspec? Photobucket
201 posted on 06/04/2010 11:32:41 AM PDT by mojitojoe (banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: tutstar

When was President Obama found to be an unlawful officer? That’s my point, he is quite lawful despite our distate of that unfortunate fact.


202 posted on 06/04/2010 11:39:04 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: BP2
LOL, with as many Body Blows as you've taken here Non-Seq, I'm surprised you can still stand at all.

As much time as you spend patting yourself on the back I'd be surprised if you could throw a punch.

203 posted on 06/04/2010 11:53:52 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: El Sordo
We shall see who ends up being right.

Knowing the powers that be, we will probably not see who ends up being right.

204 posted on 06/04/2010 11:56:02 AM PDT by Lady Jag (Double your income... Fire the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

Obama is issuing legal orders, he has been duly sworn and installed in his office. Should he later be determined to be ineligible, the orders that he has issued, the laws that he has signed will not be vacated.

I'll wait to see him found ineligible before considering the legality of the law he has signed and what becomes of it. For the moment, I posit that no order from a Constitutionally ineligible executive officer can be considered "legal". To me that is a "common sense" assertion. But for those not understanding the ramifications, I suspect it could be proved in law as well. We'll see. I agree that Lakin is on shaky ground -- who wouldn't be taking on this daunting task. But, as he is held personally liable for obeying unlawful orders, he can not be found guilty for the process of vetting the orders given to him. If the defense team successfully positions his actions in this frame, I see him coming out on top -- bruised and battered to be sure, but successful. We'll see, and I'll say a prayer for him.


205 posted on 06/04/2010 11:57:24 AM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: centurion316; BP2

Yolanda Huet-Vaughn was a "conscientious objector". She refused to mobilize as method of war protestation. She appeared at anti-war rallies and talk shows before submitting to authorities to face court martial. She did not object on Constitutional grounds; she made no effort to vet the legality of her orders. You are not comparing apples to apples. Drawing a legal conclusion on Lakin's case using this as supporting precedent is specious at best.


206 posted on 06/04/2010 12:13:38 PM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: so_real

She refused to deploy. She had no problem taking the King’s Shilling in either a Reserve or Active duty status, just claimed that she did not have to participate in what she had determined to be an “illegal” war.

There are differences to be sure, but the outcome will be the same, he’ll be heading to Leavenworth.


207 posted on 06/04/2010 12:17:09 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Sudetenland; jy22077

” He refused a lawful order from his superior. He deserves what he gets.”


And I hope you still love what you have gotten, your dear leader, an illegal alien and usurper in the White House, huh???

http://atlah.org/atlahworldwide/?p=8451


208 posted on 06/04/2010 12:21:21 PM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

oh u have proof . . . . thought so


209 posted on 06/04/2010 12:27:54 PM PDT by tutstar (Baptist Ping List-freepmail me to be included or removed. <{{{><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: tutstar

Yep, I do. The documents can be found in the National Archives. He was elected by the Electoral College. That election was legally certified. He was sworn into office by the Chief Justice of the U.S., several times. You may have caught it on TV. I’m not saying that I like it, but facts are facts.


210 posted on 06/04/2010 12:32:17 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: BP2; Red Steel; Fred Nerks; Danae; El Gato
Right on, sir!

Worth another look.

Not unrelated to this condition


211 posted on 06/04/2010 12:38:23 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, hunker down & go Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe; BP2

LoL! That's Good. :-0



HeeHee could be a classic. The Obama Eligibility Troll dysfunctional brains and memories! ;-)

212 posted on 06/04/2010 12:46:19 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

:P


213 posted on 06/04/2010 1:13:48 PM PDT by mojitojoe (banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
“You make a very good point, but I don't think LTC Larkin will succeed.”

It makes little difference whether Col. Lakin succeeds or not. We can only speculate as to the reason Obama is keeping his records sealed. It is very likely that illegal actions are being kept hidden, but it is also possible that the goal is just to preserve the mythology that sprouted from his two “autobiographical” works of fiction.

If Col. Lakin loses and receives a harsh punishment it would most likely result in far more coverage on this issue. The issue might finally get scrutiny approaching what would be reasonable for a non-affirmative action president. It would be a compelling story that could easily capture the interest of a large number of people who have not yet realized the extent of Obama’s subterfuge.

If Col. Lakin somehow “succeeds” it could result in Obama’s hidden records being released to the public and causing whatever damage his administration is trying to avoid. Either way Obama takes a hit. My guess is that the administration is desperately looking for some way to get Col. Lakin to back off. I hope he is able to stand firm, but that is an awful lot to ask of one man who is facing possibly the most aggressive and powerful narcissist the world has ever known.

It is an interesting situation and could easily develop into a major crisis for Obama. His credibility is already in pretty bad shape. It hurts me to read some of the negative comments from people who do not seem to understand the sacrifice being made here. This story is significant mostly because of its potential to help pull the curtains back so that greater numbers of Americans will realize just how little we actually know about Obama.

214 posted on 06/04/2010 1:17:52 PM PDT by fireman15 (Check your facts before making ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: fireman15

“according to a recent poll conducted by Wenzel Strategies 55% of all Americans, 55% of Independents and 82% of Republicans want Obama to release all of his records”

You and I both know this is not at all the same as buying into Birtherism. It isn’t even the same as demanding his birth certificate be released. I haven’t read the poll question, but it probably asks a simple question to which it’s almost impossible not to agree (unless you see through it), for instance “Is it a good idea for politicians to be open with their records?”

Anyway, if you had been following the conversation, you would know that I was not talking about how many people sympathize with Birthers, nor was I talking about how many people want the BC to be public. I was merely talking about the fact that normal people aren’t obsessed enough about the Birther issue to bother keeping up with the story of some random insubordinate colonel. Tell Wenzel Strategies to go back and poll the same people, and see how many of them know, or care, who Lakin is. See how many of them have lost 5 minutes worry, much less hours of pointless research, on the issue.


215 posted on 06/04/2010 1:38:30 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: fireman15
It hurts me to read some of the negative comments from people who do not seem to understand the sacrifice being made here.

Not to mention our loss of rights under the law if the trolls get their way of justice denied. It makes me both angry and want to cry that we live in a country with people who do not understand everyone deserves a fair trial. Regardless of whether you are on their side or not. Innocent until proven guilty is totally lost in their comments."Lakin is guilty, now string him up. My president is above the law."

Freedom of speech and loss of firearms next. Obama will decide who goes down and who does not. This is the America the trolls desire. For their Messiah they are willing to destroy what America stands for.

I heard Lakin can go to civilian court if they insist on denying him a fair trial. Anyone know if this is true?

216 posted on 06/04/2010 1:45:48 PM PDT by OafOfOffice (W.C:Socialism:Philosophy of failure,creed of ignorance,gospel of envy,the equal sharing of misery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
And so was Nixon.........so get over it. If Obama controls the DOJ and now the military trials he will never be brought up on charges for his crimes. Is this what you want? A president with the ability to do anything as they did in Nazi Germany? When your day comes will you be happy to have a trial with no witnesses or evidence?
217 posted on 06/04/2010 1:53:11 PM PDT by OafOfOffice (W.C:Socialism:Philosophy of failure,creed of ignorance,gospel of envy,the equal sharing of misery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

Tublecane, you are wrong. There are military groups and others watching this case closely.


218 posted on 06/04/2010 1:55:03 PM PDT by OafOfOffice (W.C:Socialism:Philosophy of failure,creed of ignorance,gospel of envy,the equal sharing of misery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: OafOfOffice
“It hurts me to read some of the negative comments from people who do not seem to understand the sacrifice being made here.

Not to mention our loss of rights under the law if the trolls get their way of justice denied. It makes me both angry and want to cry that we live in a country with people who do not understand everyone deserves a fair trial. Regardless of whether you are on their side or not. Innocent until proven guilty is totally lost in their comments.”Lakin is guilty, now string him up. My president is above the law.”

Freedom of speech and loss of firearms next. Obama will decide who goes down and who does not. This is the America the trolls desire. For their Messiah they are willing to destroy what America stands for.

I heard Lakin can go to civilian court if they insist on denying him a fair trial. Anyone know if this is true?”

No one is saying string Lakin up. They are simply trying to explain that he has been charged with a specific offense for which Obama’s status will be ruled irrelevant. And it will be so ruled because that is the correct legal decision.

219 posted on 06/04/2010 1:56:44 PM PDT by tired_old_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: centurion316; tutstar
"When was President Obama found to be an unlawful officer? That’s my point, he is quite lawful despite our distate of that unfortunate fact."

He hasn't been found unlawful yet, not because he's lawful, but because of fear. Justice Thomas has already told the country (those that aren't preoccupied with American Idol or Dancing with the Stars anyway) that they (SCOTUS) are "evading" the issue. No politician currently in office want's to be the one to openly question the eligibility of the first "black" president who really isn't all that "black" but rather mostly white and 2nd most Arabic African. The same goes for the few judges who have come up against this challenge. This "potato" is beyond hot...it's radioactively hot.

Things are changing though, as people begin to understand "who" Barry really is and what he's doing to the country. There are many people running for office across the country, for various state and federal offices, that if elected, then intend to make Barry's eligibility an open/public question in an attempt to get to the truth. The "environment" is much different today than it was in 08/09.

There is not a chance in the world that the framers would have put two distinct requirements of citizenship for POTUS in the very requirement itself ("No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution") and then to intend that a "natural born citizen" of the United States was one who was born with allegiance owed to a foreign country.

Assuming Sr. was his legal father at birth...Barry never was, nor is now a natural born citizen as know by and intended by the framers. That makes him a usurper.

If someone does something unlawful, but doesn't get caught for whatever reason(s), that doesn't make them innocent or lawful. The truth will eventually catch up with Barry. It's only a matter of when.

220 posted on 06/04/2010 1:57:07 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 261-276 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson