[AFPhys]

She absolutely was not going dressed in miniskirts and boobs hanging out. She was wearing well fitting, moderate-to-high-priced business clothing.

According to the story in village voice I just linked into a post, things she wore were not nearly as provocative as what others wore. In fact, they even told her not to wear turtlenecks! They told her not to wear business suits! They wanted her in a burka, it seems to me.

If the VV story is accurate, it seems clear that the problem is not her, but someone at the bank with an axe to grind.

[kimmie7]

So you work there and saw what she wore. Sorry, I didn’t understand.

But cleavage has no place in the workplace.

[bvw]

Turtlenecks are woven and tight. They maximize the appearance of the jutting breasts. Unless she wore a turleneck with a blazer or shawl that pulled the eye away from the two torpedoes heading atcha, I can understand why a turtleneck is a no-no.

Also "moderate to high priced business clothing" says zilch zero nada as to modesty.

Here's a gossip site pic that is interesting:

"Melanie Griffith in Brentwood looking like she's gone up a cup size or two in that tight turtleneck."

Because of the knit jacket topping the turtleneck, I think this is passably modest. Without the jacket -- it definitely would not be modest enough for work.

The tight jeans are problematic -- in a professional banking environment I think they would be a "not modest enough."

[A CA Guy]

Banks don't have axes to grind. They boot people out for being out of balance, inappropriate, for theft or incompetence.

NOBODY goes after people for looking good, it probably is a plus that would bring customers in more.