[Laissez-faire capitalist]

What say you?

[Farmer Dean]

I wish that somebody would ask these libs who they think passed all the Jim Crow laws in the south.

[Domandred]

I’ll add that depending on the law it can make racism worse.

[Sacajaweau]

He was separating out a little part of the Civil Rights Act....reference to employers.

We've seen many, many lawsuits because "they cried they didn't get promoted" or "whitey was mean"....They learned to play the game...

[Altura Ct.]

Not to mention if the real goal is ‘end racism’ and not destroy Western Culture then why do we have multiple government sponsored race groups?

[The Watcher]

The perfect response is a simple question. "Since when is the distribution of power and responsibility between the federal and state governments a purely moral issue, one to deride a person's morality, character, and good name over?"

There is no moral or racial component to this question, and allowing it to be framed as one is merely a fault, not a tactic. However, if the arguer insists that it's a moral issue... then frame it thusly: "Since when is the discussion over federalism and the role of the federal vs state governments in regulating private enterprise a matter of race?"

The arguments the left has are vacant, intellectually dishonest, and the media's so slavishly dogmatic it fails to recognize its own role. Point it out, do it for them.

[Eagle Eye]

Many Freepers will argue that the government can and must legislate morality.

[Non-Sequitur]

Laws can’t end racism, but they can guarantee that it can’t be practiced against an individual.