Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'They just threw me in jail' - Round Lake Park woman protests penalty for T-shirt
suburbanchicagonews.com ^ | May 5, 2010 | BETH KRAMER

Posted on 05/05/2010 12:19:23 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

A Round Lake Park woman was held in contempt and jailed for two days for the message on her T-shirt.

The message was: "I own the (female body part), so I make the rules."

Jennifer LaPenta, 19, was released from the Lake County Jail Tuesday.

"They should be out looking for people who are breaking the law, not arresting someone wearing a T-shirt," LaPenta said.

Associate Judge Helen Rozenburg charged LaPenta with contempt of court for wearing the garment in her courtroom Monday. LaPenta was sitting in the gallery waiting for a friend's case to be called when the judge called her forward.

Rozenburg asked LaPenta if she thought her shirt was appropriate.

LaPenta said she told the judge that it would have been inaprorpriate had she been the defendant.

Rozenburg immediately sentenced her to 48 hours in jail and had her cuffed, LaPenta said.

LaPenta contends that she never went to bond court or got to call her mother.

"They just threw me in jail. They never told me what I was going to jail for," LaPenta said.

LaPenta said that she had been at a gym Monday when her friend asked her for a ride to the courthouse. She was wearing sweat pants and that T-shirt when she was cuffed and jailed.

"All the officers thought it was hilarious -- it was humiliating," LaPenta said.

LaPenta said she bought the shirt in the gay section of Spencer's. She said she is openly homosexual and said the judge was a "homophobe" for putting her in custody for wearing the shirt.

(Excerpt) Read more at suburbanchicagonews.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 last
To: Drew68
She wasn't a defendant. She was only an observer. If the shirt was offensive, she shouldn't have been allowed to sit in the gallery. She should've been asked to leave. Allowing her to enter the courtroom, take a seat in the gallery and then arresting her for contempt seems just bit heavy-handed to me.

Not for mouthing off an insult to the judge's face.

-------------------------------------------------------

Rozenburg asked LaPenta if she thought her shirt was appropriate.

LaPenta said she told the judge that it would have been inaprorpriate had she been the defendant.

81 posted on 05/05/2010 2:58:23 PM PDT by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ozarkgirl
So how long do you think she should be jailed for wearing innappropriate attire in a courtroom?

She wasn't jailed for wearing the shirt in the courtroom. She was jailed for mouthing off to the judge.

82 posted on 05/05/2010 2:59:24 PM PDT by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: wiggen

“Being embarrassed by being tossed out is a lesson unto itself.”

Upon having read the article, one realizes that it would likely require far more than being tossed out of the courtroom to embarrass the “girl.”


83 posted on 05/05/2010 2:59:52 PM PDT by Grunthor (Over YOUR dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

Perhaps but that or an affordable fine makes more sense than jail.


84 posted on 05/05/2010 3:03:55 PM PDT by wiggen (Government owned slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Don’t hold the TEA Party in the courtroom. lol


85 posted on 05/05/2010 3:16:19 PM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com << Get your science fiction and fiction test marketed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: wiggen

You would be correct except that the word “affordable” is of course relative.


86 posted on 05/05/2010 3:54:35 PM PDT by Grunthor (Over YOUR dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

Naturally.


87 posted on 05/05/2010 3:55:29 PM PDT by wiggen (Government owned slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Don’t hold the TEA Party in the courtroom. lol

You're a funny guy.......

88 posted on 05/05/2010 4:12:43 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Peanut butter was just peanut butter until I found Free Republic.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
My brother, on the other hand, went before a judge on DUI charges wearing a Budweiser t-shirt.

I guess sometimes one member of the family absorbs all the stupid.

89 posted on 05/05/2010 4:15:11 PM PDT by Grizzled Bear (Does not play well with others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator

That first one looks kinda like a Klingon.


90 posted on 05/05/2010 7:13:58 PM PDT by TNdandelion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

Here’s my question. If you are a gay woman...who decides to be the REAL rule-maker since both of them would have possession? I’m so confused!


91 posted on 05/05/2010 7:18:37 PM PDT by TNdandelion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Sorry, but I can't justify putting someone in jail for what a t-shirt says no matter how disgusting the message may be for me.
92 posted on 05/05/2010 7:26:46 PM PDT by DejaJude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DejaJude

Ithink I’m okay with putting her in jail. Sometimes people need an attitude adjustment.


93 posted on 05/05/2010 7:32:38 PM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

They should have just thrown her out of the court room.


94 posted on 05/06/2010 6:19:12 AM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW

lol


95 posted on 05/06/2010 7:11:36 AM PDT by brwnsuga (Black and Free!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Erasmus

Erasmus, you are my favorite scientist/philosopher for that one.


96 posted on 05/06/2010 7:12:38 AM PDT by brwnsuga (Black and Free!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I guess the judge decided he owned the gavel and he would make the rules in his courtroom....itwas a challenge to his authority...


97 posted on 05/06/2010 7:17:41 AM PDT by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson