Skip to comments.
Photoshop of the Year - Michelle on Good Housekeeping
Good Housekeeping ^
| May 02, 2010
| ASD
Posted on 05/02/2010 9:26:39 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder
Next time you are in the supermarket checkout line, look at the cover of Good Housekeeping. I've linked to a pix of the cover but in real life it's...unreal. Michelle is airbrushed to the point of looking like a cartoon character. It's a stunner. Particularly for beebers.
TOPICS: Arts/Photography; Pets/Animals; UFO's
KEYWORDS: airbrush; flotus; retouch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 last
41
posted on
05/03/2010 2:55:43 AM PDT
by
ETL
(ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
To: skookum55
Whats with her wide stance?
42
posted on
05/03/2010 3:01:04 AM PDT
by
ETL
(ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
To: Attention Surplus Disorder
43
posted on
05/03/2010 3:05:53 AM PDT
by
ETL
(ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
To: Havisham
Normally, I’d agree with you but, people like Michelle Insane set themselves up for ridicule with their constant “in your face” attitudes toward us “little people”. They allow themselves to be photographed/shopped by the fawning print media rather than take a dignified position (like the two First Ladies Bush or First Lady Reagan?) on such inanity. In Ms. Insane’s case, dignity has nothing to do with it because she just isn’t capable of such. I find such photos of Ms. Insane and Hitlery Clinton to be extremely amusing.
44
posted on
05/03/2010 3:24:41 AM PDT
by
RushLake
(Liberalism/Progressivism--Domestic terrorism financed by your tax dollars.)
To: LexRex in TN
Count me in this crowd also. At least I’m hoping there is a crowd, a large crowd of us.
45
posted on
05/03/2010 5:04:02 AM PDT
by
grame
(May you know more of the love of God Almighty in the coming year)
To: skookum55
Whats with her wide stance? I think it provides cover for her hips.
46
posted on
05/03/2010 5:16:12 AM PDT
by
jtal
To: ETL
She has the same “wide stance” as that clown congressman who was caught in the men’s room at the airport trying to pick up an undercover cop in the next stall.
I wonder if she’s bowlegged?
47
posted on
05/03/2010 5:24:20 AM PDT
by
goldi
(')
To: goldi
48
posted on
05/03/2010 5:44:17 AM PDT
by
ETL
(ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
To: skr
49
posted on
05/03/2010 6:03:24 AM PDT
by
2nd amendment mama
( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
To: Stormdog
Yeast infection. uggghgghghgh. I should have known better than to eat while reading this thread. Literally, I have half a plate of chicken and mac n cheese that is going to waste now.
50
posted on
05/03/2010 8:04:31 AM PDT
by
Repeat Offender
(While the wicked stand confounded, call me with Thy Saints surrounded)
To: ETL
I swear, I did NOT read the HuffPo before posting my question! (If I had, it woulda been posted ~~2 weeks ago)
51
posted on
05/03/2010 10:41:20 AM PDT
by
Attention Surplus Disorder
(Voters who thought their ship came in with 0bama are on their own Titanic.)
To: skr
52
posted on
05/03/2010 10:43:43 AM PDT
by
Attention Surplus Disorder
(Voters who thought their ship came in with 0bama are on their own Titanic.)
To: ETL


Soviets have always had a knack for retouching.
53
posted on
05/03/2010 11:07:28 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(The hysteria of Matthewsism and Andersonism has led to a Tea Party Scare that is unAmerican.)
To: Stormdog
54
posted on
05/03/2010 12:22:16 PM PDT
by
ArmyTeach
( ...speak true, right wrong, follow the King {(Tennyson})
To: ETL
That nasty rash must have flared up again!
55
posted on
05/03/2010 3:32:30 PM PDT
by
Mortrey
(Impeach President Soros)
To: a fool in paradise
Good Ho?
56
posted on
05/03/2010 4:54:24 PM PDT
by
Justa
To: a fool in paradise
Lol. Reading it again the magazine cover is: Good Ho-ing.
57
posted on
05/03/2010 4:55:34 PM PDT
by
Justa
To: ETL; jtal
ETL: Another funky photo of Mrs. Zero with a wide stance. I'm trying to remember if I've ever seen a woman strike such a pose, let alone several times in public under the scrutiny of the international press. It's not at all feminine, but it doesn't look manly, either. It's odd. Any body language experts have an assessment?
jtal: I'm having a hard time thinking the stance is an attempt to cover wide hips. Nothing wrong with shapely hips on a woman. And, the stance draws attention to her lower body, which looks alien to me.
To: BookmanTheJanitor
59
posted on
05/03/2010 6:50:20 PM PDT
by
angcat
(GOD SAVE US!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson