How is it “sliming” the victim to see if [and if so show] that she had been dealing with such issues beforehand? It seems to me that the state could open the records and claim that because she did have such a history that the defendants “should have known better” or some such.
It is also EXTREMELY relevant if she accused one of the boys of rape if the medical records [and police records for that matter] show that she had been examined for rape/sexual-abuse at some point before; most especially if those findings were false accusations/reports on her part. {There ARE people who will make false claims against someone.}
If you do not see and understand the irrevalence of a minor child's prior behavior, in relation to a statutory rape charge, you're a deeply sick individual. No amount of whatever kind of POSSIBLE seductive behavior or medical condition on her part is material, coming from a minor. And this attempt to gain access to medical info about the victim is nothing but an attempt to put her behavior on trial.