Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: OneWingedShark
"How is it “sliming” the victim to see if [and if so show] that she had been dealing with such issues beforehand?"

If you do not see and understand the irrevalence of a minor child's prior behavior, in relation to a statutory rape charge, you're a deeply sick individual. No amount of whatever kind of POSSIBLE seductive behavior or medical condition on her part is material, coming from a minor. And this attempt to gain access to medical info about the victim is nothing but an attempt to put her behavior on trial.

89 posted on 04/19/2010 9:33:15 AM PDT by matthew fuller (#11. Thou shalt not argue with morons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: matthew fuller

>>”How is it “sliming” the victim to see if [and if so show] that she had been dealing with such issues beforehand?”
>
>If you do not see and understand the irrevalence of a minor child’s prior behavior, in relation to a statutory rape charge, you’re a deeply sick individual.

There are several key arguments in a ‘statutory rape’ case:
1) Age, which can be lied about.
2) Age difference, in some states, which can be lied about.
3) Sexual intercourse, which can be lied about.

So, there is the possibility that the ‘victim’ was a pathological liar. There is also the possibility that the accuser [given the victim suicide, must be someone else] is lying or misinformed.

The medical records [as well as criminal records] could show that there was such a history of lying.


90 posted on 04/19/2010 4:59:43 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson