Posted on 04/07/2010 7:45:56 PM PDT by Elderberry
COMES NOW, DR. ORL Y T AITZ, ESQ IN PRO SE (hereinafter referred to as "DR. TAITZ"), and pursuant to Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby files this Motion to Intervene, as a Plaintiff of Right or in the alternative with the Court's permission said motion to be heard on April 14,2010 at 9AM or as soon thereafter as practicable with oral argument requested and as grounds therefore, movant states as follows: FACTUAL BACKGROUND 1. In the captioned matter, Attorneys General seeks determination from this Court as to its obligations and duties under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. More specifically they seek to enjoin and have declared unconstitutional the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act signed into law by President Barack Obama. 2. Prior to the filing the above captioned matter, movant filed a Quo Warranto combined with other causes of action now pending in the United States District Court of the District of Columbia seeking identical relief on an identical theory of violation of the Commerce Clause, Canst. art. I, § 8. 3. A true and correct copy of the aforementioned complaint is attached as Exhibit A. 4. Dr. Taitz has also filed a motion with the United States Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation seeking the two cases be coordinated, a true and correct copy of which is attached as Exhibit B. 5. Through
(Excerpt) Read more at scribd.com ...
I am convinced that the real reason Obama wiped his alleged 7 years of college is that he committed multiple ID fraud.
Unlike you, she’s doing something more than sitting behind her computer and belittling those who are trying to save America.
I’m not belittling her for trying to save America. I’m belittling her for being such a failure at it.
Then it’s wide open for you to go out and make a success of it.
I’m under no obligation to cover for all the losers out there. Nor do I have any intention of fleecing the public out of their hard-earned cash.
With Orly Taitz as both a lawyer and a Doctor, and Obama just signing the Health Care bill, I believe it just gave her “standing”.
She’s a dentist not an M.D. We don’t yet have a ‘right’ to dental care. That’s for his second term.
But I DO wish this woman would just stop. There are a few cases where the attorneys have not been off-the-wall, and who have a sense of how to proceed in legal matters. She just seems clueless on the legal front, and now out there for the publicity (and to save her sorry arse against being disbarred).
I don't think that numbers beginning with 999 were ever used by the Social Security Administration. They are invalid numbers and never have been valid. So whoever used one was faking a number and not knowing that it was invalid.
In addition, one need not be a US citizen to obtain a valid SS number. Aliens here legally can do so. One would presume that anyone who made up a 999 number would be an illegal alien without adequate knowledge of the numbering system.
And you know this HOW? Are you an attorney? Could you even come close to what she has accomplished? If so, why haven’t you? Fact is, good or bad, she is keeping this in the public eye, and not letting it go. I don’t see anyone stepping up to the plate, do you?
I have no idea what she has accomplished as a dentist. On the Obama legal cases, however, she has accomplished absolutely nothing but to make a fool out of herself in every venue allowed.
“I dont see anyone stepping up to the plate, do you?”
As a matter of fact, Donofrio, Apuzzo, Hemenway come to mind. And, they are attorneys one can take seriously.
What has Dr. Taitz accomplished? A lot of publicity, mostly negative, and from every direction, about her ineptitude.
She’s accomplished several complaints to the CA bar for her grossly inappropriate and unprofessional behavior, including one at least by a former client and another by a federal judge. She’s accomplished a $20K sanction from a federal judge, which sanction was upheld by a US Court of Appeals. And she will likely accomplish disbarment before this is over .. NOT for what she supposedly is trying to accomplish but for how she is trying to accomplish it.
This is a big and critical question and is best handled by attorneys qualified to go into court. Anyone who believes Dr. Taitz has advanced the eligibility question one iota is sadly mistaken.
u can get dental care thru medicaid
“u can get dental care thru medicaid”
Ah, but can you get veneers thru medicaid? I’m waiting till that’s a right. (ok, I’ll be long gone, but it’s coming, it’s coming)
don’t know about veneers but in certain cases it covers braces
... right into the ground.
Incompetent, attention whore, mental case that she is.
I hate it when I agree with you.
It’s all good. It’s a love-hate thing. :)
I believe there are two camps of birthers ...the moonbat camp (who try to FORCE issues to fit their mental inanities, with people like Orly and a couple of FReepers here. Examples of lunacy include that scanned BC that was worshiped as the True Cross for a while last year). The second camp is the legitimacy camp that wants to see proof that Obama is eligible to become president. This is a logical coherent camp that is asking questions that are very legitimate, and questions that Obama should answer. Obama is definitely hiding something, and what this camp is trying to do is to force the truth out.
The second camp is the right one. The first camp simply makes the second look stupid.
Unless the Birther movement is represented by outside counsel with a through understanding of the federal courts they are destined to fail no matter how valid their claims may be. Additionally, outside counsel is needed to honestly advise the movement as to the realistic chance of success a particular litigation path offers simply throwing mud against the wall is neither an effective nor successful litigation tactic...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.